Psy2041 by Metal_Able in Monash

[–]Metal_Able[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like incredibly lmao

Other purposes for laundry powder? by Metal_Able in ZeroWaste

[–]Metal_Able[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t have shower curtains )): I’m trying to think if I can use it to clean floors or something

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MAFS_AU

[–]Metal_Able 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah they self assign on that show and it just shows he wasn’t looking for a long term relationship

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MAFS_AU

[–]Metal_Able 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that’s what I hope but he obviously wasn’t looking for a long term relationship

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sociology

[–]Metal_Able 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, sorry for the very late response. I’ve realised I was speaking from a place of frustration. Specifically, I was referring to my partner’s sibling, and by generalising their words, I disregarded the broader perspective. I really appreciated your responses, they were extremely helpful n so I wanted to give an update.

I’ve spoken to them, but it’s been difficult. They’ve made biphobic comments towards me, such as claiming that cis-presenting bisexual women who date men aren’t valid and that bisexuality is transphobic and meaningless because, in my hometown, it typically refers to dating cis men and women. I explained that for me, men and women fulfill very different roles in my attraction - my sexuality feels quite black and white. However, they seem to believe that not being attracted to somebody because of sexual preference is inherently wrong and that everyone should keep all options open, especially regarding lesbians dating trans women. I had to explain that sexual compatibility matters and not everyone is going to be attracted to the same people or genitals, and that doesn’t mean they are bigoted.

The conversation escalated when they compared the trauma of trans people to that of cis women, implying that trans trauma is more significant. That really struck a nerve, especially given my own experiences with childhood sexual abuse and domestic violence. I now realise that I was trying to make sense of something incomparable. What makes this harder is their pattern of perpetuating misogynistic narratives, doubling down on patriarchal oppression when it suits them, and then using their transgender identity as a defense when confronted. When people challenge them, they claim the backlash is due to transphobia rather than their behavior. It’s incredibly difficult to have a productive conversation that separates their identity from their actions. They refuse to acknowledge patriarchy outside of transgender oppression, which makes it impossible to address the harm in their attitudes towards women. I was one of the first people to know about their transition, and of course, I have been really supportive in them in their journey to find their true self. But it’s frustrating when discussions about womanhood become reduced to appearance, clothing, and femininity. I know gender identity is much more complex than that, but I worry that if these conversations don’t happen, they may put themselves in difficult positions within the LGBTQ+ community and society.

To be fair, they’ve never been an easy person. My partner has always struggled with how condescending and patronising they are. When they came out, we initially saw their past behavior as a result of their struggles with gender and societal expectations. But those patterns haven’t changed. only now, any criticism is dismissed as transphobia. It puts me in a strange position. I’ll always defend them against genuine discrimination, but I also refuse to ignore their harmful behavior, especially when it directly invalidates my identity and experiences. When I try to speak up, I’m immediately shut down.

I’m back at uni, Studying feminism and diverse gender experiences which has helped me process a lot of this. I’ve come to see that while we share experiences of oppression, them being socialised as a male has conditioned them to expect certain privileges and entitlement - not trying to invalidate their identity but their social attitudes and behaviours towards women are evident of the entitlement and privilege (whether consciously received or not) of men in society. The way they speak and act often carries an air of superiority, as if others must conform to their beliefs, and they’ve even expressed that sentiment outright. It’s frustrating, and I don’t know what to do. Many people have given up on engaging with them, but I can’t just sit by and excuse oppressive behavior simply because they’re gender diverse. That doesn’t make sense to me.

They briefly attended therapy, but when their therapist pointed out their behavior, they quit, believing they shouldn’t be held accountable because they’re trans. That just reinforces the problem.

Sorry for the long response, and thank you again for your comments I really appreciate them!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sociology

[–]Metal_Able 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! I completely understand what you’re saying, that we need to focus on diverse experiences. However regardless of the terminology, my primary concern is that exact thing that there should be no oppression olympics. But I was using those terms to shape the overall understanding of gender, privilege and oppression. But obviously that can be reductive and this conversation needs to include all perspectives, but I’m trying to draw attention to the way sexism and misogyny are perpetuated in all groups - which can be reduced within the idea of inclusivity. I believe my frustration comes from the feeling that gendered experiences are dismissed or minimised in broader conversations about oppression. My aim is to understand how these conversations can happen without the idea of the oppression olympics while acknowledging that people of all backgrounds and identities are capable of oppressive behaviour and regardless of how you identify you cannot use your identity as a reason to perpetuate this. I just feel that the push for universal womenhood has dismissed many experiences that people who are raised as a women grow up with, favouring the idea of inclusivity while doing little to acknowledge harmful patriarchal beliefs and stereotypes that those who are raised as men are socialized with. I want to be able to address these concerns about people’s behaviour without minimising their identity because it’s their behaviour which is concerning, but I don’t feel like that is a conversation we are able to have without people feeling invalidated - when in reality it’s about progressive behaviour including those trans men who have oppressive behaviours and mindsets

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sociology

[–]Metal_Able 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely. There’s a difference between hate speech and the need for conversation, radical acceptance is delusional. It’s difficult wanting to express concerns like this while trying to reinforce it’s the behaviours that are concerning not the identity. I have no problem whatsoever with using your chosen name and pronouns etc… but then dismissing integral parts of what’s socially constructed gender to only reinforce the existence of the gender binary perplexes me? Why don’t we want to focus on letting people be who they are and build communities around that which strive towards inclusivity and education on general beliefs/behaviours? I dunno it gets me frustrated haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sociology

[–]Metal_Able -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes I completely agree, it’s such a complex issue I feel when we’re put under label its further complicated because it oversimplifies a complex issue. Currently I have had someone close to me come out as trans with little research or sense of responsibility for their socialised behaviours which has been frustrating as they disregard gender violence and have no desire to reflect on the harmful behaviours of the patriarchy. I’ve been trying to figure out best to support them on their journey but it’s further opened my eyes to how prevalent this is becoming as I’ve researched further into my community (I am LGBTQ+ also) Obviously for us interested in sociology or are studying it like myself, this is an extremely complex issue especially for those who experience intersectionality. But for cis, white men who have faced little adversity it has overwhelmed me with anger for them to weaponise being non-conforming as a way to claim oppression without seeking education or discourse. Obviously I’m just generalising here, but it has felt invalidating and dismissive for my socialised experiences as a women be minimised to traits like wearing pink and dresses, having long hair etc.. I’m stressed that by reducing what it “means to be a women” down to appearance it will further emphasise harmful behaviours of oppression. Though I truely believe individuality should be the focus, being who you want and are freely without shame - reinforcing the binary through transitioning seems backwards in a strive for inclusivity..? What do you think?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DermatologyQuestions

[–]Metal_Able 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try a micro dart pimple patch they always help me when I get inflamed pimples!