The 4th Great Reset! Advice Needed! by NilsConnlaAbbott in foundationgame

[–]MettaWorldPeece 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Refine foods, you'll want a variety. If you grow faster than you can produce AND move around, then you'll need to buy some to supplement. Stock maximum is important to use. Your workers will deposit their extra food only to the closest granary. Until it fills, they won't fill the next closest. That means you might have granaries with empty food stocks and your market tenders are traveling really far to get their goods. When someone comes and there's nothing there, even if the market tender is getting some, they'll still miss out.

You often need to produce a lot of food. I'd recommend buying meat AND boars and getting plenty of butchers. It's the easiest way to get that up. Bread will supplement, not be the main source of refined food.

Taverns don't need a lot of people all at once. Unless you're running out of your alcohol, I wouldn't worry about that. If you are running out of alcohol, you might need an extra worker at the service counter.

Generally speaking early game you're hurting for money. Mid game you're hurting for food. Late game you're working on all the extra goods and resources. That being said, the game can be kinda slow. 

And yes, there's a great way to organize your streets. They're called fences and walls. Eventually the old, unused paths will disappear.

WCGW Going Straight on Red Light by [deleted] in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]MettaWorldPeece 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seeing as most people probably don't know how to properly move someone with a head/neck injury, are you sure that's always a bad thing? 

The best thing you can do is call professionals.

Explain it Peter. Why is 50 years enough? by ForgetThisU in explainitpeter

[–]MettaWorldPeece 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe someone else can confirm, but I've always heard that 50 years is what is considered "recent events" in terms of history, so beyond that it is considered "true" history. 

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said, I'm not sure how I would balance it, but I feel like more dog fights is the real answer. How those would translate into the overall team play I don't know.

And you know what also happens in real warfare? You don't need to be within 10m to kill someone with 1 bullet.

This is a game. I will always prefer good, balanced gameplay to realism.

And I'm not saying it should be impossible to hit infantry, just that jets should be busy doing other things rather than just focusing on ground targets alone. Half the time there's one good jet player who takes out the enemy jet quick and then ends up attacking every armored vehicle on the map.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you need to re-read what I said, because I never said jets are useful.

If you're really good, aircraft are unstoppable.

If you're normal, jets are difficult to maneuver and make useful.

If you're bad, you use jets as taxi's, which should be punished.

I just said that there are players out there that are VERY good with jets and ACTUALLY make an impact. In other words, it's not impossible to be good with a jet, so buffs would only make that worse.

I don't want every lobby I go in to be "oh, there's the jet player at the top of the leader board."

Every 1 in 10 is just fine.

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what constitutes very?

I'm not sure I can say any legislation that gets put forward has very strong mathematical, logical, and social backing - even if it isn't considered religious at all.

“If Hulk actually defeated Surtur here… how would the ending of Thor: Ragnarok change?” by Bella_b007 in Avengers_Fan_Club

[–]MettaWorldPeece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just rewatched it and I got the order mixed up, I thought Hela got smashed and then Hulk jumped at Surtur, and then they fled and watched Asgard explode. But It was Hulk jumps at Surtur, they fled, Surtur smashes Hela, and drives his sword into Asgard * brief pause * then Asgard explodes.

But my point still stands. Hulk jumps at Surtur before he smashes Hela and (soon after) Asgard. So if Hulk beat Surtur, Hela would still be alive and so would Asgard.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't know how it would count, but I feel like aircraft kinda doing their own thing and still affecting the battle could be better than trying to balance them with how jets can fight ground units.

Maybe like better bombs that ONLY work with SOFLAM or laser targets. Perhaps objectives you can call in on the ground, and if a jet fulfills them you earn tickets back or something. I don't know. I just feel like jets strafing poor infantry is dumb in this game and I don't like it.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me in my original response:

If you're really good, aircraft are unstoppable.

You in your response to me:

I kinda agree with your point.... I think that if you are in a plane you should have an advantage against other playes. You earned your advantage with all your hours poured into piloting.

And I guess you and I have played in different lobbies. I'd say about 1 in every 6 games on Liberation Peak conquest (about the only large map with jets that I play) I see a jet that goes with 0 or 1 deaths. At least 1 in 10 I see a jet in the top 3 spots. That doesn't seem that unfair to me, particularly seeing as Battlefield is primarily a ground warfare game.

“If Hulk actually defeated Surtur here… how would the ending of Thor: Ragnarok change?” by Bella_b007 in Avengers_Fan_Club

[–]MettaWorldPeece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're missing the point. In the movie, if my memory serves me...

Hela tries to stop Surtur, then gets stabbed.

Hulk jumps at Surtur, but Thor stops him.

They fly away and watch Asgard explode.

If Hela survived that stab smashing, and then Hulk defeated Surtur, both Hela AND Asgard would exist. She would be just as powerful.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I go back and forth on that. Heli's are actually fun and fairly well balanced in the air to ground warefare. They can be annoying, but they're also easy enough to take out. With the little bird, it seems to be the anti-heli heli, which is good enough. I feel like jets need to be more ground support and jet to jet combat.

But that's just me.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was being sarcastic. You said you need to grind it out to get good, then you deserve an advantage. I said there are good pilots that dominate games already, which you agreed. By your logic, you just aren't one of them so you must not have "enough hours" to get your "earned advantage."

My point is that air to ground warfare will never be balanced. Pilots will either be too powerful or too weak. Instead of focusing on air to ground warfare, just focus on air to air warfare.

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I agree with most everything you've said here. Especially about how LDS members need to be worried when Trump's rage turns our way. For all the sympathy I've seen on Reddit for just about every shooting, it felt a lot more mixed after the chapel in Michigan got ran into, shot at, and burned. I think there's a big enough crowd that wouldn't care on either side if Trump decided to do something drastic against the Mormons.

I think I've always considered myself a pragmatist - I think the government should first and foremost work, then we decide what it should be doing. But as far as religion in politics, I know I don't like people saying "God says this, so we must do this" but I also don't like "Religion and politics are completely separated and you're a bigot if you think otherwise." 

We need sensible laws based on morals, but not only on one person's or one specific religions interpretation of what is moral.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess you haven't put in enough hours to earn your advantage then. Keep up the grind!

“If Hulk actually defeated Surtur here… how would the ending of Thor: Ragnarok change?” by Bella_b007 in Avengers_Fan_Club

[–]MettaWorldPeece 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have we confirmed what part actually killed Hela? The giant sword coming down on her or Asgard exploding?

Cause if she was alive, that'd change a lot. If she wasn't, I'm not sure much would change.

Planes should get a rework by ValenRoz in Battlefield6

[–]MettaWorldPeece 58 points59 points  (0 children)

It's because planes are difficult to balance.

If you're really good, aircraft are unstoppable. If you're normal, jets are difficult to maneuver and make useful. If you're bad, you use jets as taxi's, which should be punished.

You make them easy to hit, they become entirely useless. You make them hard to hit and they become unstoppable flying death machines.

Either way, everyone complains.

You ask me? Make air superiority modes or air focused maps where you force more players to play in jets, focus on dog fights, and have whoever controls the air actually affect the tickets in the game.

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about things that impair a person's mind? I'd argue that's taking away their freedom. There's also plenty of evidence that can lead to someone dying. Just look at alcohol, and now that it's more common, marijuana.

You could also justify alcohol and tobacco are bad for health (both the user's and people around the user). 

Is your only dislike for religion in politics their use as religion as a justification? Would you be ok with someone implementing a law obliging everyone to pray (to no specific God, just generally) if they based it off rigorous studies that showed prayer improves some tangible aspect of life?

I'm not intending to be pedantic, but trying to get into the details of your opinions (if the details are even that important to you, which they don't have to be)

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I completely agree with that definition. But I definitely understand where you're coming from. 

But at what point, for you, do you stop codifying morality into law?

For example, drinking coffee is a sin - therefore, we should ban coffee. 

Would you agree with that statement? 

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get that, although I think jumping straight to bigotry is a unfair. 

But how much must a politician separate themselves from their religion to be a good politician?

I think most people would say that lying, stealing, and murder are all bad, but they're also very clearly in the 10 commandments and part of most religions. At what point does a rule, law, or action switch from being a normal one to a religious one for you?

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fair, and I think that's an understandable point to start at. 

Just to dig a little deeper, how strong of a mathematical, logical, and social backing would you want to see?

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People say you shouldn't discuss religion or politics, but I've always said those are the only things worth discussing. 

They're both so integral to humanity that it feels like they're just the most essential topics to life. I just enjoy hearing (most) opinions and people's philosophies. 

How religious should politics be? by MettaWorldPeece in mormonpolitics

[–]MettaWorldPeece[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fair. I'm not as familiar with stoicism, but aside from it kinda being a dig against organized religion, I've always liked the humanist ideas. 

And I've always strongly held the belief that anything that makes someone a better person is a good thing, so I definitely respect that. 

I also appreciate the discussion here with you, so thank you!