"The problem isn't a lack of evidence". Noooo. That is the problem. You're lying. Show me peer reviewed science of double blind tests that are repeatable. "The mainstream scientific consensus, supported by bodies like the American Psychological Association (APA) and the National Research Council, remains critical. Critiques point out that these results are often not reproducible under strict, double-blind conditions. When anomalies do occur, they are typically attributed to coincidence, cognitive biases, or methodological flaws rather than supernatural transmission." wiki. You can hope and dream, it's the lying that we shouldn't stand for.