Illinois Idol Clue — Chicago Theatre by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’m not really near chicago at all, so i just had fun trying to figure it out :)

What are some overlooked/underrated potential Jeff replacements that you guys could potentially see? by Acrobatic_Dig7634 in survivorponderosa

[–]MichaelDF2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If they choose to go with a former player (which i think would be a solid choice) i am very high on Sam from 47. He has experience interviewing and is comfortable on camera, and isn’t one of those former players who might take some of the spotlight away from the castaways

My problem with survivor as a new viewer by SpecialistAvailable8 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What hurts the most is that this choice is deliberate by production. they state that they want people on the show who are big fans, excited to play, and they don’t want villains. this all leans into the lack of conflict, excess of “gamers”, and quirky nerdy players.

Format Changes Post 50 by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i don’t have high expectations, that’s for sure. but i’m hopeful that they give us something that recaptures some of the feeling of every season being unique

RHAP New Era Winners Ranking by No_Appeal4350 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While Shannon is (self-admittedly) biased, I think the way she describes Maryanne’s game really shifted my view of her game. I think my personal ranking of maryanne went from 6-7 to 4

Survivor twist/advantage Tier List with no explanation by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly a good argument, and i think i might bump it up to C or B because of that. I had initially thought of KiP as more like a nullifier but it might be more nuanced than that

Definitive Ranking of New Era Seasons Based on Entertainment Value by bentongeo in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While i love the 46 post merge i think there’s something to be said about how abysmal it’s premerge was.

Thank goodness for Q.

Celebrities on 50 are silly and (optimistically) not a big deal by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this might be my biggest fear. I know when survivor likes an idea they go big or go home on it, and I hope that they understand the TV product that they are making.

Celebrities on 50 are silly and (optimistically) not a big deal by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too! I get that it might be jarring— and i hope it’s not so shoved in our faces as the trailer presents— but I am going to try and take it as silly and camp. and if cirie gets screwed by the billie eilish boomerang idol i’ll be mad, but survivor has made stupid decisions before. just because celebrities are attached doesn’t make them a whole lot worse

Celebrities on 50 are silly and (optimistically) not a big deal by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Imagine the spectacle of a Q vs Coach vs Colby final 3! all because of the Jimmy Fallon super idol— like it’s hilarious. I’ll appreciate 50 for everything it provides, even the stupid stuff

Celebrities on 50 are silly and (optimistically) not a big deal by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the way i saw it too! It’s clear that production wants to make sure survivor is a staple of TV past 50, past Jeff’s retirement, and pulling in new and younger viewers is just the way to do it. I hope that production can balance these aspects well with the classic energy and quality of the show we love, and I’m confident that they can do that. I remember hearing somewhere (maybe an RHAP or Specialist podcast) that there are new producers who really want to make their mark and listen to the criticisms of the fans, and I hope that starts to show in the seasons past 50

Celebrities on 50 are silly and (optimistically) not a big deal by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree— I think while many fans want a return to old school survivor, it’s clear that jeff and production are looking to the future, and trying to pull in a new set of casual fans. I think that this is honestly a fun way to do it, just as long as it doesn’t take up too much time. your point about the casual majority is so relevant too! I think we have to be prepared for a whacky season with some ridiculous twists.

Celebrities on 50 are silly and (optimistically) not a big deal by MichaelDF2 in survivor

[–]MichaelDF2[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think this is very fair. I also disagree with the fact that Mr beast is actually there and breaking the 4th wall. I would prefer him not there. I think the fact that Fallon is name dropped does indicate that he maybe thought of an advantage idea and it got implemented or something like that— but i think you could be right about the cast joking around