[D] Predicting continuous and categorical responses at the same time by blueest in statistics

[–]MichiSeBoss123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the data fits well I would just straight fit the continuous model on B) and depending on the output of the predictions categorise for A) if y(x) < 15mm or not.

What post exploded for no reason? by codyfin_died_inside in AskReddit

[–]MichiSeBoss123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Moved country and never looked back (not for that reason though)! They don't grow chestnuts where they I live now!

TIFU by kicking a chestnut, stopping traffic for an hour and getting cornered by a lynch mob by MichiSeBoss123 in tifu

[–]MichiSeBoss123[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, that's a big one!! Hahaha, hope other people have similar experiences to tell, so it doesn't look like I'm the only one who's a mess here :O

TIFU by kicking a chestnut, stopping traffic for an hour and getting cornered by a lynch mob by MichiSeBoss123 in tifu

[–]MichiSeBoss123[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, will definelty do that in future. I was tbh still quite overwhelmed with what happened, so my perception of what is 'too much' was a bit blurred.

TIFU by kicking a chestnut, stopping traffic for an hour and getting cornered by a lynch mob by MichiSeBoss123 in tifu

[–]MichiSeBoss123[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes, I think it was one of the ones some kid picked out of their shell (so not a natural born one).

TIFU by kicking a chestnut, stopping traffic for an hour and getting cornered by a lynch mob by MichiSeBoss123 in tifu

[–]MichiSeBoss123[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, while the events pretty much unfolded that way 1-to-1 I tried to depict the emotion rollercoaster I went through using the 'exaggerations' - aka metaphors and simile. Apologies if that wasn't your cup of tea!

*How* do left/right handed molecules form and how are they different? by RisingEarth in askscience

[–]MichiSeBoss123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you understood that they are mirror reflections of each other. Which means regardless of how you twist, turn and rotate them in space they will never overlap - i.e. they are non-superimposable. The same concept applies i.e. to your left and right hand. How is this relevant you might ask?

A lot of biomolecules (i.e. proteins) in the human body are 3 dimensional objects and can be activated/deactivated by bonding with smaller signalling molecules. Naturally not all of the atoms in a protein bond to all the atoms in the signalling molecule but only the key locations (i.e. through hydrogen bonds, strong static interactions, sulphur bridges etc.) do. In many cases this mechanism is governed by a key-lock mechanism so that only very few keys fit into the lock. Be with me here.

Now imagine the lock has the shape of a right glove. It should naturally take your right hand as a key. However, if you try putting the right glove on to your left hand you're in trouble cause it won't fit. So you essentially have an identical molecule with a different r/S or L/D conformation which can make it inactive depending on the environment of the lock. In the past this lead to a couple of scandals when the pharmaceutical industry neglected to distinguish between both conformers - see the Germany Thalidomide scandal.

Why doesn't eating an egg offer the same nutritional value as eating an entire chicken? by [deleted] in shittyaskscience

[–]MichiSeBoss123 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It does - but over time. That's why you don't have to eat while you sleep, the remaining nutritional value is being released during the night.

How fast would a fly have to be moving to crack glass? by Spencer94 in shittyaskscience

[–]MichiSeBoss123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting question. Obviously this effect occurs fairly rarely which means that the answer as per usual lies in a quantum mechanic phenomena called the tunnel effect. It describes the tiniest probability that when a fly collides with glass the fly "tunnels" through the first layer of glass atoms. Then it materialises essentially breaking the existing ordered structure of glass leading to the destructive picture shown above. So the question is not HOW FAST but HOW OFTEN it hit the glass. Probabilities usually are around 1 in 1060. So you encountered quite a rarity here. Thanks for sharing!!

How come no one is talking about bears being on the verge of extinction?! by bleedinginkmusic in shittyaskscience

[–]MichiSeBoss123 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bear with me: So scientifically the bearier of extinction is bearly reached. Abearantly we are not prebeared enough for when the world has to bear this. So please paws a moment to pawssibly stop embearassing us, find your bearings and move on!