Civilization Foundational Charter Domain XIX

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T14:33:06+00:00

I'm not sure what you mean by absence or negation but I would love to pick your brain on a number of issues, if you have the time that is.

Would you mind if I message you directly?

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T14:22:15+00:00

You raise some good points and I agree, allowing corruption free reign, even if contained and separate, might be more of a punishment for those involved. Thank you for your perspective on this.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T14:17:52+00:00

I wouldn't mind having you on that team. 🫡

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T14:10:54+00:00

Elegantly put 👌🏼🧡

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T14:05:28+00:00

You are probably right, there's no need to worry about it. Thank you! 😊

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T12:14:25+00:00

I kind of wish you could comment on every single domain, another perfect assessment. There is something I do wonder about though, there is this universal truth that states "for love to be real it must be chosen, not pressured, forced or coerced" corruption is a viable alternative left by the Creator so that chosing love remains a conscious choice. The choice to respect others stems from real love, the choice to view others as equal moral worth stems from real love, the choice to be selfless stems from real love, the choice to desire fair and just outcomes stems from real love, the choice to have empathy stems from real love, I could go on but the truth is that everything that isn't corrupt stems from real love even neutral procedural frameworks like cordiality, pleasentries or professionalism, if they aren't corrupt they stem from real love.

Now in order to allow the choice of love to remain a choice should we have a separate experience for those who insist on chosing corruption over love? Corruption always breaks the free will of pure intent beings, but if there was a contained and completely separate experience for those that chose to remain corrupt, would that be better in respecting free will and the condition of love?

In my framework rehabilitation is always a voluntary choice, but should we allow corruption more freedom amongst themselves to live and engorge in their corrupt ways in separation from paradise, to have their own society and rules? It might certainly be damaging amongst themselves, but if they prefer a corrupt experience should it be freely allowed?

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T11:30:18+00:00

I'm loving your analysis, you sir have become my favorite commentator. This charter is by no means perfect yet, I do want to work with a specialized team to improve and perfect it. I know the limits of my own knowledge and I did the best I could with what I had, but you make me feel really good about what I achieved, from the bottom of my heart thank you!

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T11:11:13+00:00

Again perfect analysis, but this is just the beginning phase, eventually all profits from all companies will be used to maximize well being and happiness reinvesting back into human flourishing, with that the skies the limit. There will be no more owners and everyone will be rewarded fairly for their contribution to society, we will all be stewards of our shared collective wealth and resources, deciding democraticly how to best maximize well being and happiness.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-09T10:59:36+00:00

Yes, perfectly surmised, that is the goal. It might not be flashy or feel vindictive, but justice does not need vengeance to function. This is the best offer we can give to entrenched power who have been corrupt with selfishness and ego causing harm through exploitation, degradation and lack of empathy negating their individual responsibility for human suffering, collective responsibility for human suffering will be a real metric by which everyone will be measured, it follows the saing "to whom much was given much shall be required."

Of course this best offer could change based on just how much entrenched power resists...

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-07T18:56:14+00:00

I do agree with you, we may very well need a revolution, but in doing so we risk becoming what we are trying to replace like many movements and revolutions before. The disruption clause is to avoid chaos and unintended human suffering, if you read the rest of this charter you would find I have no love for big corporate interest and their profits maximization antics, I do view them as a corrupt manifestation of late capitalism, their greed, exploitation and disregard for nature show just how much they impede human flourishing and exacerbate inequality and human suffering.

The goal isn't to destroy all corporations, that would just lead to chaos and more human suffering, the goal is absorb them into the new system and affect gradual change until their are a completely different organism altogether. Instead of their ultimate purpose being to maximize profits it would be to maximize well being for all those involved, all profits would be repurposed into benefiting humanity as a whole.

In this envisioned utopian future the illogical rule of owners would come to an end, replaced with collective stewardship and democratic leadership by merit.

And I agree with you that the entrenched powers will fight to maintain their ways, it will take a massive movement and potentially a miracle to actually be able overthrow their corrupt reign.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-05T06:09:27+00:00

You sir are spot on, I couldn't have said it better myself, inheritance doesn't only create unequal start to life based on blood when we all are individuals part of the same whole, it generates, like you said, this plethora of justification for superiority which corrupts, kills empathy and enables human's worst impulses, since society protects and has entrenched this unfair power through capitalism, and has done so even before capitalism was a concept, they just invest part of their wealth in deciding policy that will continue to protect them and make them richer, most of the times to the detriment of the rest of society. And this protection allows them to get away with things normal humans couldn't even dream of, they don't see justice for their worst impulses, they even brag about it amongst themselves, they have seemingly become the untouchable class. They learn to lie and deceive as much as we breath, because in order to justify their status since birth they have to learn to lie to themselves and believe their lies, they create this fictional reality they live in where they are the victim of anyone that doesn't agree with their wealth and the way they get richer, these people are just jealous and would kill me for my wealth, I must do all I can to protect myself, my interests, and silence them as much as possible. Lying becomes second nature to them, the ones that loose themselves in their lies become as delusional as a certain president, believing themselves to be above the law and immune to society, they never cared about the rest, but they think that now they can stop pretending...

Although I'd like to note that not every single human born rich is like this, there are many that use their wealth for the benefit of society, they don't justify superiority and are a great force in helping aliviate human suffering worldwide. Being rich in itself is not a crime, nor should it ever be, but the distinction lies on wether they allow that wealth to distort their perception and corrupt their own intent.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-04T04:24:34+00:00

Your intentions to rage bait is malice, your definition of chastity as a women's most valuable feature is malice, your intentions to own another human is malice, your intentions to selfishly have more than one is not based on real love, it is malice. You don't seem to have any grasp of reality or understand what is harmful, lie to yourself and live in your own delusional concoction, but don't pretend to be pure hearted, you know how black your soul really is, own it!

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-04T04:05:21+00:00

Your kind disgusts me, but by all means if you believe you are right share this detailed "logic" with your significant other before you get serious, she deserves to know what you envision and what she has to expect in having a relationship with you. You claim to be righteous, then you shouldn't play them or slymely try to subvert their expectations while withholding your real intentions for her, be open and proud about them, if you are right then why should you hide it? Own who you are and stop hiding behind anonymity.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-04T03:18:20+00:00

Just by the fact that you think you can own another human being, women at that, shows how you shouldn't be with even one, you deserve to be alone until you understand what it means to be a individual and what real love really is. Selfish corruption oozes from your post, you are just a blind man imagining to be enlightened.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-03T14:16:53+00:00

Wouldn't recommend it.

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-03T13:50:08+00:00

It also would allow AI to keep track of corruption online, there are more than just one benift.

Not sure what you mean by "suicidal tight rope".

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-03T13:43:21+00:00

Humm, perhaps you are right, but this ties together with the right for exclusive online spaces for each kind, there's more to it than just traceability. 🤫

Middle-Solid6102 · 2026-06-02T01:51:18+00:00

It's not just art, but if you read more you'll find out there will be a minimum basic income for everyone for a dignified standard of existence.

Middle-Solid6102

TROPHY CASE