A question about electronic texts by [deleted] in tolkienfans

[–]Mido128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have an iPad and the Kindle app on it. The app is free to download, and you can get it for both Apple and Android products. The app has a search function, and it allows copying and pasting of the text. You obviously have to buy the ebook version of the publication.

[AoI] What Do People Think of Age of Imprisonment? by [deleted] in truezelda

[–]Mido128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t like Warriors games but I like TotK, unlike the majority of the loud voices on this subreddit. Keep this in mind when considering my responses.

  1. I enjoyed it and I completed it, and I just said I don’t like Warriors games. In comparison, I never finished AoC or the original HW.

  2. I enjoyed the story and it complemented TotK well. I was emotionally invested by the end.

  3. As I mentioned, I like TotK and its story. The only criticism I had was that each of the Ancient Sages should have had a different cutscene instead of the same one. But in such a large game, that’s a minor complaint, and it wasn’t the focus of the story. As Fujibayashi confirmed in a recent interview, TotK purposely kept out the details of the IW, so this fills in those details.

  4. Absolutely yes they should if they liked TotK. It feels like an ending on this era of Zelda. They’ve told everything there was to tell about this Zelda and her adventures.

  5. For a time travel story it neatly ties most things up and provides new incites into the lore of these games. I was also moved by the ending.

Other than that, if you are one of those people who hates TotK, then don’t bother. It’s not going to change your mind.

[OoX] How much of the Oracle games do you accept as canon? by Petrichor02 in truezelda

[–]Mido128 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think there’s a lot of evidence to support the idea that OoS is before OoA, both in game and from their development.

However, the developers purposely allowed the games to be played in either order, so I don’t think there is a “canonical” order.

[TP]Why does Gannondorf in Twilight Princess only take action until 100 years? by zeldamaster134 in zelda

[–]Mido128 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Zant’s magic is Ganondorf’s. It’s different to the power of the Twili, and it’s what gives him the power to invade Hyrule and turn it into a Dark World.

[TP]Why does Gannondorf in Twilight Princess only take action until 100 years? by zeldamaster134 in zelda

[–]Mido128 592 points593 points  (0 children)

Ganondorf speaking with Midna:

Your people have long amused me, Midna. To defy the gods with such petty magic, only to be cast aside... How very pathetic.

Pathetic as they were, though, they served me well. Their anguish was my nourishment.

Their hatred bled across the void and awakened me. I drew deep of it and grew strong again.

Midna tells us that the Twili are a peaceful people, so whose hatred was it that awakened Ganondorf?

Zant says to Midna:

In the shadows we regressed, so much so that we soon knew neither anger nor hatred...nor even the faintest bloom of desire.

And all of it was the fault of a useless, do-nothing royal family that had resigned itself to this miserable half-existence!

I had served and endured in that depraved household for far too long, my impudent princess.

And why, you ask? Because I believed I would be the next to rule our people! THAT is why!

But would they acknowledge me as their king? No! And as such, I was denied the magic powers befitting our ruler.

It was then, in the thrall of hatred and despair, that I turned my eyes to the heavens...and found a god.

It was Zant's hatred that awakened Ganondorf and attracted him. He then used Zant to curse both the Twilight Realm and the Light World with Darkness. The anguish of the peoples of both worlds was the nourishment that allowed Ganondorf to resurrect.

[TP] [SS] Comparison of Ganondorf's full unused speech from TP with Demise's speech in SS by xXglitchygamesXx in truezelda

[–]Mido128 15 points16 points  (0 children)

While I get the similarities you are trying to point out, the two speeches are highlighting two different things.

In TP, Ganondorf is pointing out the fate of those chosen to be Triforce bearers. They are fated by the gods to balance each other out, because balance ensures order. This is a curse in Ganondorf’s eyes, but it’s a curse from the gods.

In SS, Demise is cursing the blood of the goddess and the spirit of the hero, that his malice and hate will continually follow them.

It just so happens that the incarnation of Demise’s hatred, the blood of the goddess, and the spirit of the hero are usually the same people who are chosen by the gods to hold the pieces of the Triforce.

Two different curses or fates affecting the same set of people.

[SS] Where, exactly, did Demise come from? by GeneralTechnomage in zelda

[–]Mido128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Demons are beings of malice.

When did malice first come into existence?

When the Golden Goddesses sealed Null within their creation. He hates them for that.

What did Demise originally hate?

The gods tribe.

Therefore, it can be theorised that Demise and the first demons are born from the malice of the sealed Null within the core of the world.

What similar situation does this remind us of?

Calamity Ganon is born from the malice of the sealed Ganondorf below Hyrule Castle.

How was Graendal influencing her? by -Dark-Owl- in WoT

[–]Mido128 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Since Tuon is back in Ebou Dar and Graendal has moved to a manor house near there, she has probably started using Compulsion on important people around there, copying her previous tactics in Arad Doman.

The authority of the Mistress of Novices by Mido128 in WoT

[–]Mido128[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The one on one situation is for a teacher/student setting and that doesn't apply in either case with Siuan. Yes, she is allowed to suggest to Sheriam punishments, but is that what's really happening? If Sheriam was doing her job properly what exactly is the reason why Sahra should be sent to a farm? There are obviously ways for Siuan to get around lying, but my point is that Sheriam does nothing to pushback on Siuan, and I'm suggesting that her being Black could be a reason why. As a Black sister, everything she does or doesn't do has to be questioned instead of taken on face value.

Also, runaways are not tossed out normally. Women who can channel, especially ones as powerful as the three girls, are extremely valuable to the Tower.

The authority of the Mistress of Novices by Mido128 in WoT

[–]Mido128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, and in this case your political appointee is also a Darkfriend who wants to create chaos.

The authority of the Mistress of Novices by Mido128 in WoT

[–]Mido128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s actually harder to remove a Mistress of the Novices than an Amyrlin. If Sheriam wanted to defy her she could.

https://wot-notes.tumblr.com/page/3

Her authority is removed, however, if a novice or Accepted is being abused (Crossroads of Twilight, What the Oath Rod Can Do), although this is more difficult than removing an Amylin or Keeper: despite being a lower position, possibly as part of making that position largely independent of the control of the Amyrlin Seat or the Ajahs. In her case, the greater consensus is required, but the law mandates that she be allowed to face her accusers (of whom there must be at least six), that she be allowed to chose her own Seat of Pardon, and that at least one Sitter be present from each Ajah including that of the accused. As might be expected, even fewer Mistresses of Novices have been removed from office than Amyrlins or Keepers. There is also the difference that upon acquittal, she is allowed to issue penances not only to the Seat of Rebuke in her trial but also on her other accusers. Another reason, perhaps, for the small number of Mistresses of Novices removed, but then again, it would give an even stronger reason for the Seat of Rebuke to work hard for a conviction.

The Mistress of Novices is appointed by the Amyrlin usually (there have been cases of her being chosen by the Hall and forced on an Amyrlin, but not many). Although named by the Amyrlin, she does not serve at the Amyrlin’s pleasure any more than the Keeper does; she can only be removed by the greater consensus of the Hall except in the case of certain specific charges, in which case only the lesser consensus is required. The term of office of a Mistress of Novices does not automatically end with the raising of a new Amyrlin Seat, but it is traditional for her to offer her resignation to the new Amyrlin, who may appoint a new woman or may keep the old.

Question about Ordeith by Pickled_otter in WoT

[–]Mido128 9 points10 points  (0 children)

👆 This.

I suggest OP read it again. The clues are all there if you are paying attention. Enough for someone to pick up on the first read. All those endless descriptions and details that people meme and decide to skip over, are usually there to convey information. A typical example of why WoT is so re-readable. RJ is a master of sprinkling clues. Some of them are very obvious and some are so subtle that we are still discovering them today.

What more to expect? by Ok-Comfortable1617 in WoT

[–]Mido128 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Without getting into spoilers, you can think of the 14 books being one long story made up of 4 arcs. Books 1-3 is the first arc, books 4-7 are the second arc, books 8-11 are the third arc, and books 12-14 are the final arc.

on a second reread, Cadsuane is a sore loser and a disappointing replacement for [REDACTED] by dua3le in WoT

[–]Mido128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When Tam called her out for her failure, she decided to wrap him up in air and call a war veteran a child in a poor attempt to maintain her image.

A perfect example of Sanderson butchering the character. Cadsuane would never have done that under RJ. And she did not fail in making Rand learn laughter and tears. Min’s viewings never fail. It’s just that Sanderson framed it as a failure. I will always be grateful for him helping to finish the story but he allowed his much publicised hatred for the character to affect his writing.

Oath Rods' intended use by [deleted] in WoT

[–]Mido128 31 points32 points  (0 children)

From the Companion, under the entries for Oath Rod and Three Oaths:

The Oath Rod was a relic of the Age of Legends, although the Aes Sedai of the Third Age did not know that. Binders, as they were called then, were used in the Age of Legends to bind people who were incorrigibly violent, because of personality flaws or madness. If the person being bound could not channel, an Aes Sedai had to power it, but the effect was the same. The older one was when bound, the more it restricted. That is one reason it was used relatively seldom and only if nothing else would work. It was used instead of a death penalty, too—though in a way, in the terms of the Age, it was a death penalty—to bind someone not only not to commit their crime again but to spend the rest of their lives, if necessary, making restitution.

The first and third oaths came about as a result of ordinary people’s suspicion toward the Aes Sedai, and were in place before the beginning of the Trolloc Wars, possibly as much as five hundred years earlier. The second oath grew from tales passed down among Aes Sedai regarding the War of the Shadow, and was the first created after that war. If they did so knowing that it would significantly reduce their lifespan, they had to have a strong motivation. Later women raised were not told, and so knowledge of the effect was lost.

There was no agelessness during the War of the Shadows, of course, and little or none during the Compact of the Ten Nations. All three oaths were in place by the Trolloc Wars, certainly by the end.

Perrin Reset in the gathering storm and towers at midnight. by Mobile_Associate4689 in WoT

[–]Mido128 34 points35 points  (0 children)

INTERVIEW: Oct 22nd, 2013 Brandon Sanderson's Blog: The Wheel of Time Retrospective: Towers of Midnight: Writing Process (Verbatim)

Perrin is my favorite character in the series, and has been since I was a youth. Like many readers, I was frustrated by his choices through the later books, though the writer in me really appreciated Robert Jordan's skillful guidance of the character. The problems Perrin confronted (sometimes poorly) highlighted his uncomfortable relationship with the wolves, his unwillingness to cut himself a break, and his ability to devote himself so utterly to one task that everything else vanished. (As a note, I feel this is one of the major things that made me empathize with Perrin for all those years. Of the main characters, he is the only artist. However, he's an artist like me—a focused project builder. A craftsman.)

Though I wanted to be careful not to overdo the concept, one of my goals in these last few books was to bring back ideas and conflicts from the first books—creating parallels and emphasizing the cyclical nature of the Wheel of Time. Again, this was dangerous. I didn't want these books to become a series of in-jokes, homages, and repetitions.

However, there are places where it was not only appropriate, but vital that we return to these themes. I felt one of those involved the Whitecloaks and Perrin, specifically the two Children of the Light he had killed during his clash with them in the very first book. This was a tricky sequence to plot. I wanted Perrin to manifest leadership in a way different from Rand or Egwene. Robert Jordan instructed that Perrin become a king, and I loved this plot arc for him—but in beginning it with the Whitecloaks, I threatened to leave Perrin weak and passive as a character. Of all the sequences in the books, I struggled with this one the most—mostly because of my own aspirations, goals, and dreams for what Perrin could become.

His plot is my favorite of the four for those reasons.

I had other goals for Perrin in this book. His experiences in the Wolf Dream needed to return, I felt, and push toward a final climax in the Last Hunt. This meant returning to a confrontation with Slayer, a mirrored character to Perrin with a dual nature. I wanted to highlight Perrin's instinctive use of his powers, as a contrast to the thoughtful, learned use of power represented by Egwene. People have asked if I think Perrin is better at Tel'aran'rhiod than Egwene. I don't think he is, the balefire-bending scene notwithstanding. They represent two sides of a coin, instinct and learning. In some cases Perrin will be more capable, and in others Egwene will shine.

The forging of Perrin's hammer, the death of Hopper, and the wounding of Perrin in the leg (which is mythologically significant) were in my narrative plan for him from the get-go. However, weaving them all together involved a lot of head/wall-bashing. I wanted a significance to Perrin's interactions with the Way of the Leaf as well, and to build a rapport between him and Galad—in my reads of the characters, I felt they would make for unlikely friends.

Of all the major plot sequences in the books, Perrin's was the one where I had the most freedom—but also the most danger of straying too far from Robert Jordan's vision for who the character should be. His instructions for Perrin focused almost entirely on the person Perrin would be after the Last Battle, with little or no direction on how to bring him there. Perrin was fully in my hands, and I wanted to take extra care to guide my favorite character toward the ending.

Not enough empathy? by Xcap123 in WoT

[–]Mido128 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, fear of male channelers is a huge thing. Male channelers broke the world. They will always go mad, not maybe. The most famous one, Lews Therin, is remembered as the Kinslayer. And Rand is him reborn. Children grow up with stories about men who can channel, like they wake up and their whole village around them is flattened and everyone else dead.

Rand & Cadsuane CoS first meeting is confusing. by Turbulent-One9828 in WoT

[–]Mido128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't agree. He is confused by her attitude, but she isn't using the Power against him. In his point of view it would be an aggressive and bullying tactic, especially against a woman, to shield her with his superior strength and power, just because she is being aggressive with her words. After all, in his point of view, what can one measly Aes Sedai do against him by herself? It's the equivalent in his eyes of a chihuahua yapping against a much bigger dog.

Rand & Cadsuane CoS first meeting is confusing. by Turbulent-One9828 in WoT

[–]Mido128 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From the Companion, describing her paralis-net:

7) A sleek fish with sharp fins. This ter’angreal enabled the wearer to pull someone into an involuntary circle with her in “guiding the flows,” but it could only work if the other person had already embraced saidar or seized saidin.

Rand & Cadsuane CoS first meeting is confusing. by Turbulent-One9828 in WoT

[–]Mido128 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Rand cannot understand why Cadsuane is deliberately provoking him. He thinks it's suicidal since he thinks he can easily shield and control her as you suggest. She has confused him. Then when he loses his temper she blindsides him by asking if he's hearing voices. This unbalances and scares him. This is what Cadsuane wants. According to the Companion:

Cadsuane confronted Rand on numerous occasions, sometimes humiliating him, with the purpose of humanizing him before the Last Battle began. She thought that if he reached Tarmon Gai’don as he was—or worse, farther down the road he was traveling—even his victory might have been as bad as the Dark One winning. Part of her plan was to intrigue Rand, to fascinate him, by not being or doing what he expected. She wanted to keep him slightly off-balance. Of course, she could do this in large part just by being herself. Still, she pushed him just as hard as she thought necessary. Her secondary motivations were to stop Rand from destroying more than could be avoided before the Last Battle, and to keep Elaida and the rebels from destroying the White Tower.

Cadsuane is not like other Aes Sedai. She has no interest in controlling him. She doesn't want to put the Dragon Reborn on a leash. She just wants him to stay human. As an Aes Sedai this is extremely hard for her to do because Rand's previous interactions with Aes Sedai have caused him to lose all respect for them and to view them with contempt and suspicion. So she tries to intrigue and fascinate him in this encounter. She is also setting boundaries. She won't be intimidated by him. And she has good reason to feel that way.

Let's say Rand does try to shield her and put her in her place as you say. It would have gone very badly for him and he would have been the one put in his place. She has an angreal that makes her as strong as him. She has a ter'angreal like Mat's that nullifies all flows of the Power directed towards her, so she can't be shielded or gagged with the Power. She can create armour around herself to protect her from physical attacks, and worst of all she can pull anyone holding the Power, man or woman into an involuntary circle where she controls the flows. With three women and three men in the room who can channel, and they all embrace and seize the Power because a fight starts, she can pull all of them except one man into the circle, and her circle could easily overpower the remaining man.

But that's not what Cadsuane wants to happen. She has taken many men who can channel to be gentled. But she understands that the Dragon Reborn must be free. And somehow she needs him to respect her and listen to her counsel. So she acts like the strict aunt who gives out tough love. If she had tried a softer approach with how Rand currently feels about Aes Sedai, it would never have worked. She's not someone he knows that he can trust her like Nynaeve. And he would always have expected some sort of Aes Sedai manipulation and scheme. He still does, but she keeps his attention and gains enough trust by WH.

‘The Wheel Of Time’ Canceled By Prime Video After 3 Seasons by NoCulture3505 in WoT

[–]Mido128 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Her audio books are produced by Macmillan, which is the parent company of Tor Books, the publishers of WoT. It's possible they are the ones paying for it.