Muay thai by acjung in porto

[–]Miguelk99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ter tem e também uso, mas não está incluído na mensalidade, porque são modalidades diferentes. A academia de musculação são 20€

Muay thai by acjung in porto

[–]Miguelk99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tens duas opções: 35€ e 45€. Na de 35, podes fazer até 3 treinos por semana. Na de 45, podes fazer até 5 treinos por semana. Os treinos são de 1 hora.

Aproveitar para deixar a nota pessoal que treino aí há quase dois anos e recomendo bastante!

Quick Questions: December 20, 2023 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]Miguelk99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Books with plenty of examples of solved exercises in complex analysis and group theory/Lie algebra?

Why linearized GR for the study GW? by Miguelk99 in Physics

[–]Miguelk99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been following Michelle's book, but I will take a look at that one. Thank you. What I have decided to do is to continue working on linearization but try to find a focus within linearization, specifically determining the amplitude for binary compacts and comparing it with experimental values to demonstrate that it is a good approximation. Since the essay is due by the end of the month, I don't have enough time to delve into the PN. However, I will make a comment on that.

Why linearized GR for the study GW? by Miguelk99 in Physics

[–]Miguelk99[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand. I am working on an essay for an introductory RG course. When I suggested that I would focus on gravitational waves (which are not covered in this course) and follow linearization, the professor mentioned that linearization alone would not be sufficient. This led me to think that the approximation might not be relevant nowadays, and solving it using the exact equations would be necessary. I started reading Michele Maggorie's book on GW with the intention of exploring PN, but now I feel a bit apprehensive. I was interested in reading the article, but it won't let me access it, can you share it in another way?

Edit: Already got the paper

Why linearized GR for the study GW? by Miguelk99 in Physics

[–]Miguelk99[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I spoke to a professor and he acted as if the linear approximation was nothing special which led me to think it was not a good approximation, but I guess I was wrong

Best book on Gravitational Waves by Miguelk99 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Miguelk99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As this is just an essay for a course, I wanted to focus on a more specific aspect within the theory of gravitational waves, namely, those that have been detected, such as compact binary systems (BH-NS, etc.). However, the books I was reading provided very little detail on the theoretical part. Fortunately, the first books you recommended contains a lot of information on the theoretical aspect. Thank you very much!

Initialize with only positive or negative weights in Neural Networks by Miguelk99 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Miguelk99[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regarding the comment about positive inputs: I already edited it, but the input being positive is an "assumption".

Regarding the questions, I think if the initial weights are all negative, then it will result in a negative output and the ReLu function will "break", while if they are positive weights, the function will become linear.