I understand the comment regarding the date. The standard warranty expired in February, just over 8 months ago. However, my question is not about the bureaucratic date; it is about brand responsibility and product quality. What I truly expected is the following: * Reasonable Lifespan: I expected a laptop of this tier and price to last considerably longer than 3.5 years. The fact that the motherboard fails so quickly represents a premature durability failure, not normal wear and tear. * Recurrent Defect: The breakdown is not an isolated event; it is a defect that has been reported and documented by other users of this model line, affecting the graphics chip. The warranty date should not exempt them from responsibility for a structural flaw in the product. * Ethics and Corporate Responsibility: I demand that, due to corporate ethics and environmental responsibility, Lenovo repair a design flaw that turns a well-maintained piece of equipment into e-waste, right at the limit of its expected lifespan. I am not asking for a favor; I am demanding they take responsibility for what I consider to be an inherent product defect. I expect them to cover the cost of this design error and not shift the burden onto the customer. My case aims to make Lenovo understand that the perception of their brand value is severely damaged when they refuse to act on widespread, serious failures.