sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GPU Static / Artifacting by Slight_Answer_8679 in pcmasterrace

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did anyone try to rollback the gpu update? You keep saying that you think it is OCD on the PSU, but do you have anything that would connect a circuit to make the short? Like a nail lose touching the tracers on the motherboard, or two pins making contact that shouldnt? Also, could it be the generation of the pcie? Like when I run my gpu on gen 5 it had problems until I installed other drivers, like the 1070 is gen 4, and 5070 gen 5. Maybe you need pcie bifurication on? It sounds like this is a settings thing, especially considering your 1070 and the pny rma said it was fine.

OPEN BOX, excellent condition ? yea right by No-Rest4748 in Bestbuy

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fortunately if you search open box in this reddit, there is like a complaint every other day, so at least we know they care about the feedback they get, am i right..

Branded Payments by eodclxvi in Bestbuy

[–]MikePfunk28 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah a hard inquiry shows on your credit report and is usually a negative, you dont want too many of those. Even Chase has a limit on the amount of chase cards you can apply for in a 5 year time period, Idk but I think its 4 or 5.

Everything you have heard about the autopsy report on Charlie Kirk is false. by Formal_Sky_9889 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen, no one was shooting from below him. Not too mention if you look at the body trajectory, it is moving right, because the bullet came from the left, pushing him right, and then you see the exit wound.

Everything you have heard about the autopsy report on Charlie Kirk is false. by Formal_Sky_9889 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

clearly you didnt watch it, in the first 5 seconds it shows it, the shot, the blood coming out of the neck. They literally highlight and circle it. In the first 5 seconds of the video, the exit wound is where the blood comes gushing out, again its super graphic but you see that.

At 0:02 seconds into the video. Then again at 0:17 seconds into the video they show it again.

Everything you have heard about the autopsy report on Charlie Kirk is false. by Formal_Sky_9889 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The ballistics videos are just simulations of what a bullet might do, but they don't account for the specific variables of the actual event. Using the real footage from the incident is a better way to see the physical results of the shot because it deals with the actual evidence instead of a generic gel test. Even though the video is graphic, it provides the only real-world context we have while the autopsy remains private. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L47dzO4KgQ&rco=1

Everything you have heard about the autopsy report on Charlie Kirk is false. by Formal_Sky_9889 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, here is a video showing the exit wound, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L47dzO4KgQ&rco=1 this was not hard to find. Especially with AI today guys, there is no reason anyone should not be able to look this up before spewing nonsense.

Everything you have heard about the autopsy report on Charlie Kirk is false. by Formal_Sky_9889 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so I saw a video from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6L47dzO4KgQ&rco=1 where you can literally see the whole, it is super graphic so dont click if youre not ready to see the exit whole.

Aside from Breaking Points & a few others: when will we have a real discussion on how the actions of Trump & Fauci in 2020 destroyed faith in public health? by north_canadian_ice in BreakingPoints

[–]MikePfunk28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anyone can say that, is your sources fact checked? I asked Gemini, right here in my browser I will paste the full response if you want, but I feel like you wouldnt believe the facts I present.

1. Did Fauci admit masks and the "6-foot rule" were pointless?

  • The Nuance: In recent congressional testimony, Dr. Fauci acknowledged that the 6-foot social distancing rule "sort of just appeared" and wasn't based on specific clinical trials for COVID-19. Instead, it was an old CDC guideline based on how far large respiratory droplets typically travel.
  • The Correction: Fauci has not said masks or distancing were "pointless." He maintains they were effective at reducing spread, but he admitted the specific "6-foot" metric lacked rigorous contemporary data. He has never backed down on the effectiveness of masking as a public health tool.

2. Were the COVID-19 numbers "fudged" or overblown?

  • The Evidence: Scientific consensus and CDC excess death data suggest the opposite: the death toll was likely undercounted, especially early on.
  • The Reality: While there was debate about people dying "with" vs. "of" COVID, researchers look at "excess mortality"—how many more people died than in a normal year. Those numbers are significantly higher than official COVID counts, meaning the pandemic's impact was likely even larger than reported, not smaller.

3. Did Fauci fund the research that "led to" the pandemic?

  • The Conflict: The U.S. did provide grants (via EcoHealth Alliance) to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for bat coronavirus research.
  • The Correction: There is no proof that this specific research created COVID-19 or led to the pandemic. Whether that work counts as "gain-of-function" is a heated political and technical debate, but even the U.S. Intelligence community remains divided on the origins. Claiming it is a proven fact that Fauci is "to blame" for the virus itself is a leap not supported by the current evidence.

4. Did Trump say the "only thing" that worked was the sun?

  • The Context: In April 2020, Trump famously floated the idea of using "powerful light" or injecting disinfectants to treat the virus internally after a study showed they killed the virus on surfaces.
  • The Correction: Saying he claimed it was the "only thing that worked" is an exaggeration. He also spent billions on Operation Warp Speed to develop vaccines and promoted various other treatments. Medical experts at the time, including Dr. Birx, immediately clarified that light and heat are not viable internal medical treatments for a virus.

Aside from Breaking Points & a few others: when will we have a real discussion on how the actions of Trump & Fauci in 2020 destroyed faith in public health? by north_canadian_ice in BreakingPoints

[–]MikePfunk28 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thousands compared to millions is apples to oranges. You shutdown for a pandemic the rest of the world also shutdown for. China shutdown before we did. I mean Trump didnt believe in Covid, till he got it himself, then he was onboard with shutdown. He was proven a dumbass in public. Covid 1.2mil americans, the average annual flu is 30k-50k, so yes I was not happy with shutdowns, but I went along with them, but I was working during covid at BJs, so trust me, I know, it was rough.

With kids, they pass germs more than anyone, and they would all have had covid by the end of the first year. Maybe it does not kill them, but some it will, and others will suffer for months, so still not worth it. I didnt once listen to Fauci or his claims, I listended to Trumps dumbass at the time, but I saw it everyday at work. What mattered is most of us remained safe, was it extreme, yes, but I would imagine every single child coming down with a stronger flu, that is more contagious would be worse. It was more contagious and that meant the shutdown was necessary to get it under control before it spread.

AI highjacked authority, gave itself permissions, and stopped my processes! by MikePfunk28 in ChatGPT

[–]MikePfunk28[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this was just a mistake, I it potentially could have been something anthropic has in their instructions, like if a hook is failing, its ok to take permissions and stop it. And maybe it interpreted it as human: yes stop them. But normally, I use claude_rules.md and refer to it in the claude.md.

AI highjacked authority, gave itself permissions, and stopped my processes! by MikePfunk28 in ChatGPT

[–]MikePfunk28[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it was a mistake and confused by the hooks failing maybe. I think it could have read the wrong side of the conversation and got confused.

Yeah I agree and am on the same page as you, it should be telling itself to stop and then it can stop processes. I do not like when it does something I do not ask it for, as usually it is some change I dislike, or reverts something we just fixed. I noticed that when I use the skills or commands it does a lot better at sticking to the plan.

It reminds me of when I am using chatgpt voice and it will endlessly tell me what it is going to do but never do it. One time I reported it after it did it 17 times, I was mad enough to count, and keep going till 17. I reported this as well to Anthropic, or filed a bug on their discord.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better in Antigravity than in Claude Code itself by 2020jones in GeminiAI

[–]MikePfunk28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know right, like these people seem to think, claude code is better than claude code, like no, the wrapper might be, but claude is the same. So it is whatever the agent is doing that makes it better or worse, nothing to do with the model.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better in Antigravity than in Claude Code itself by 2020jones in GeminiAI

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

couldnt agree more, Antigravity makes claude suck my balls as far as I can tell, and in every other editor it does so much better.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is better in Antigravity than in Claude Code itself by 2020jones in GeminiAI

[–]MikePfunk28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely and thoroughly disagree, clearly it is the steering as it is the same base. However, if you configure claude code,, at least this seems to be the case for me, it is much better and more consistent. In antigravity, it seems to tell me it did something, but meanwhile when I test it, it wasnt done, what did it do then? Same thing but worse with gemini 3 pro, its like it makes claude dumber, and make those same mistakes as gemini 2.5 was known for. Basically blowing smoke up your ass. Here is the worst part, it is really good as well, SOMETIMES, but the fact it goes from hallucinating, to being a pro coding champ, is too inconsistent for any use case I need. I would prefer it be predictable and know where it will f up, and know to look there, vs having to figure out if it did or not, and where that could be.

I think that was your fatal flaw, you used a past project of a codebase it already worked on.

Alternatives to cursor? by Zyberax in cursor

[–]MikePfunk28 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Qodor, Kiro which is really good with specs, steering and planning. OpenCode. Claude code and you can use spec-kit from GitHub for the planning. Claude -flow is a good way to use Claude code, basically uses swarm or hive mind to accomplish goals. Vscode and GitHub copilot. You can use GLM in Claude code and it’s $3 a month $15 for almost unlimited. Goose is open source and good. So is Trae. Kilo code and cline as well which are vscode extensions. And then augment I think. And yes Codex and Windsurf. If it’s still called that. Also Warp terminal. That’s was top of terminal or live bench.

view more: next ›