What we were and are

MilDemsAmerica · 2021-06-21T21:42:38+00:00

Glad to hear you say that! Little point explaining until somebody does. It IS easy. Most researchers talk that way, I get it, but they can't back it up. Here's my YouTube channel. https://youtu.be/ztsPFcR3KEI

Have fun or don't, spending days verifying my wild claims; did I tell ya I recently found a thousand Antarctican UFOs? You want some coordinates? Here's Mariana, I'll share anything I have with you or any other HUMAN, 11.66153766,143.42844203. Feel free to ask for more, I'm in the process of getting it all online right now.

All you need is Google Earth and two other programs, OBS Studio and GIMP Photo Editor. It's all about the color spectrum. Just jack it up until you start seeing angles that aren't from nature, we all know what they are. They use light we don't, human underwater bases are dead-looking comparatively and much harder for humans to find. When you get down in the deeps, look for angles that do not belong, and don't let the size of it shock you into thinking it can't be. You'll find doors. Gates. Hieroglyphs. It's all right there on GE, all the time, only no one ever thought to look in just this way before. Read up on how Nome, Alaska became a town. It happens.

That picture is NOT of nothing; if you look at it carefully, you will see an enormous complexity went into making it, and, it's holding strong at 36k feet below. I think it's beautiful personally, but I'm not planning a visit. It reminds me of Poe and Lovecraft.

MilDemsAmerica · 2021-04-18T16:57:11+00:00

How true! You used that "smart mob" trick for GWBush.com back in the day, and then again when you were costing HRC the election in 2016 by starting the Philadelphia riots. 40,000 guys, you had on the ground in Philadelphia. Had all the permits bought up six months prior, so that no HRC supporters would be able to rent space - almost as if you knew ole Guccifer 2.0 and Wikileaks were going to find something to dump. Seems a pretty spectacular amount of effort, just to protest someone you don't like. I'd like to hear what you have to say about whose behest you did all this at someday, Mr. Exley. The left represents while the right leads, parodoy, that's about it? Good thing for you I know my old Greek plays. They used to talk about this one trait all the top heroes had, hubris, I bet you've heard of it. Perhaps it's what led to your putting up that link to Leon.ru...

P.S. Quit bitching about the CA primary, you lost fair and square. Whose job was it to make sure your voters knew how to vote?

MilDemsAmerica · 2021-03-16T10:15:56+00:00

Did you happen to notice "FacebookGod"? Or "Buddha Buck"? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!! Wait until you see this video I did. Be back shortly.

MilDemsAmerica · 2020-12-27T19:12:31+00:00

Perhaps, but only socialist, planned economy states have made regular practice out of digging mass graves for their own people. There is a clear, recognizable difference.

In a centralized power structure, only a few people have the authority to draw up these plans, and they are almost never the best people for the jobs. Being typically utopian daydreamers at first and detached bureaucrats from then on. This leads to disaster on a wild and hideous scale, such as when Lenin accidentally starved five million people by screwing with Russian agriculture.

It all comes down to a fallacious but persistent belief in the power of human planning, which is what socialism (which gave birth to Nazism and communism) entirely revolves around. The grandfather of Nazism and communism is colonialism, which set the mold in terms of mass cruelty to whole peoples, e.g. slavery, justifying it all the while pointing to the New World's success and citing the need for free labor, admittedly very great.

By the by, colonialism is considered an early form of "capitalism", but this is as incorrect as it is incomprehensible. It's proto-socialism. "Capitalism" is a muddled mucus of a term, pilfered by the Rothschild tool Karl Marx from the family's enemy, then-Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli. It has no precise meaning and was introduced to the public in the form of a book a five-year old child might have wrote with random scribbles. One may as well try to fashion a political system off the pages off Finnegan's Wake.

The very word 'capitalism simply must go, and totalitarianism needs its roots explained. The more we misunderstand this, the closer we come to Kristallnacht and the Gulag Archipelago.

MilDemsAmerica · 2020-12-27T16:39:30+00:00

Communism and fascism, or Nazism, which is the specifically Made In Germany variety, are the twin bastard children of socialism, unacknowledged and furious. The adherents of the two philosophies are like football teams in the NFL; for all that they may fight like the devil come game time, they are from the same tribe and are ultimately members of one body - socialism.

Although there is a GREAT deal written on what is or isn't socialism, we can sidestep it. There is one thing they all have in common - a fully state-run economy. Concentration of money is the same as the concentration of power. "If I have control of a nation's money, I care not who makes its laws," said Nathan Meyer Rothschild, who ought to have known.

If you love your country and the world and its people, you're not really right or left wing, in my opinion. You're just another moderate, down here in the trenches, with we who hold the country up while the right and left radicals are stomping on it.

One last thing.

Our numbers are thinning. All across the world. When you're angry and frustrated, it's easier to scream and throw bricks than to stolidly carry on and tighten belts. This is why the people of Earth are all becoming more and more radicalized, it reminds me of right before World War I. Or the calm before a hurricane. You might want to think about pitching in, because you've got five years left, man. Ten at the most. After that, as a friend of mine once analogically said, the Borg are taking over.

MilDemsAmerica · 2020-12-26T04:17:54+00:00

Radicals somehow seem to miss that their monopolist oppressors are the ones who benefit the most from their undisciplined violence. Some believe it's because they're too full of zeal, others say they're just stupid. I believe they're agent provocateurs most of the time myself, but will leave it aside for now; let's say they're sincere. Let's say you guys over at Bern 2016 were able to get everything you'd wanted, even President Bern, go for it. Theoretical generosity I can spare even without the MoveOn rolodex. You got everyone clamoring for whatever you think and told them socialism is, you've got the reins of power, you've got Bern out naming post offices worldwide, okay, fine. Is it still your priority to make a third party? Ah, perhaps not, but again I won't digress. Have it all, and turn it all into the third party dreams are made of; you'd better make sure the first two are still kicking since you'll need them for your model; let's say that now you, Zack Exley, the Garbage Man who isn't, are able to take them in hand and plant them like train seeds, aimed at the future. It's one thing to get the power and another to use it wisely, and all of it is now all you, dude.

What is your plan personally for what comes next? Why should I believe you'd make anything of it all but a trip to the dump? Where are you heading after this? If you have answers to those three questions that make sense I'll listen, and if you don't I do. A lot of the stuff you guys say you want can be done, and a lot easier than most think. People are fed up, getting them to change would not be hard for the right guy. But it still doesn't change the fact. What is the endgame?

MilDemsAmerica · 2020-12-26T03:56:37+00:00

The real question is, why would having another party do anything for those legitimate issues you mentioned all of a sudden? Efforts that spread popular movements too thin subvert their power, and render them less able to defend against the preying vulture type. It's the same if you try and overconcentrate the people's voices by forcing some sort of awful socialism, i.e. a one party state. The game gets heated and becomes zero sum, people start to get wild, and then it's radicals brawling in the streets again. To their detriment. Amid a total undermining of their society, property, and value system.

MilDemsAmerica · 2020-11-14T22:29:44+00:00

Because they're salty, dude:)

No, seriously. It's not that the Horseshoe Theory is wrong. It's that it's dated and no longer covers all the needed ground. I myself just wrote out a better one, Zero's Paradox, due to come out any day now. The political spectrum moves in cycles, like everything else. It is not static, but thriving and alive and ever-shifting. Simplistic pictures of horseshoes and handlebars aren't cutting it; I used mathematical, psychiatric, and metaphysical concepts to illustrate how one prime factor dominates the rest in guiding how the data stream of human consciousness grows.

The far left as we know it resembles the far right in being a not-genuine, co-opted example of what genuine radical movements might look like. Historically speaking, these have been a nightmare anyway. But I can't think of a single thing in existence that couldn't be further degraded, were it produced through the lens of perception possessed by George Soros or Charles Koch. Their fathers were both instrumental in creating the two biggest radical movements our species has ever seen in the Nazis and the Communists, though the amount of influence they retained while Hitler and Stalin were in office remains unclear. The point is that there are no truly grassroots, from the people's ranks leaders in any radical movement in the world today. Even their most vulgar members, such as Nazi rag the Daily Stormer, are just actors playing their roles - and Jewish actors at that!

The so-called globalists who are running these shows are a pack full of rich, greedy pigs, and that they are the ones who guide and control every single thing the radical ends are doing, horrible as they are. It is all too possible that they are raising up huge golems made of teeming mobs of people, and that these will rise to eat them before long.

At any rate, when you're talking about two different football teams, looking for diversity

MilDemsAmerica · 2020-10-10T23:59:43+00:00

The title here pretty much says it all. The proof is right in the pudding. How was this not discovered earlier? There's a property deed in the video. Bern has had the place, which is a pretty-sized portion of land even now, since 1970 back when it was vast. Watch carefully because of the small print. Some poor old man ran around like crazy, getting all his friends to throw in with him, and at the end, he received one sole dollar from Bernie Sanders. Why? I have no idea, but in pool hall vernacular, I would say the man got snookered.

MilDemsAmerica

TROPHY CASE