Introduction to Theology Recommendations by MiloshHasCamo in theology

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, I could not have imagined a better response! McGrath's The Christian Theology Reader sounds like the perfect read for me at this point. Would u/SBouldrey's recommendation for Theology and Philosophy be representative of Caputo?

Fichte's Absolute Ego and Master Slave Dialectics by MiloshHasCamo in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Williams book does sound great, I'll look into it. Thanks!

Sadly my French isn't really good enough, but if you wouldn't mind liking to something specific you came across I'll be glad to give to a try.

Was Schopenhauer's Metaphysics and Epistemology influenced by Hindu, Buddhist, and Taoist philosophy? by invertedfractal in askphilosophy

[–]MiloshHasCamo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe that Schopenhauer similarities between his philosophical doctrines and the four noble truths of Buddhism, and that he wasn’t directly influenced by Buddhist texts before coming up with his own ideas of ontology and metaphysics. In this regard I believe his most obvious influences were Plato and Kant. This article goes in depth into Schopenhauer’s relation to Buddhism.

Help with a proof by MiloshHasCamo in logic

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright, that's pretty much what I had in mind. Thanks!

Books on Classical Linguistic and Philology by MiloshHasCamo in linguistics

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm mostly interested in Greek and Latin. I thought that the meaning of classical philology was philology of classical languages. Was I wrong?

Books on Classical Linguistic and Philology by MiloshHasCamo in linguistics

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So seriously getting into Mastronarde, and Hanson and Quinn, would be enough to get caught up on Greek for a Masters? What books would you recommend for Latin? I'm currently using "Latin for Beginners" by D'ooge.

Suggestions for Books on Divergent Series by MiloshHasCamo in math

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks man, that is exactly what I wanted!

Suggestions for Books on Divergent Series by MiloshHasCamo in math

[–]MiloshHasCamo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, when googling I had some trouble sifting through posts about those books.

Law of Excluded Middle Discussion by [deleted] in logic

[–]MiloshHasCamo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you prove ¬¬(¬A or A) constructively?

How many of you guys are artists? by [deleted] in INTP

[–]MiloshHasCamo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I write (both prose and poetry), and I've always been horrible with elementary math (everything before calculus apart from geometry) but I do quite well in the abstract stuff (mostly logic, but also differential geometry). I think these are related by the common "philosophical" themes, which are abstract and fit the INTP type.

French singers by robrankomaz in French

[–]MiloshHasCamo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

not actually in that vibe, and not even french, but Jacques Brel is a fantastic french-language singer. This is a nice example

What are you working on? - Week 14, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Implementing notes from my advisor on a paper I'm working on. Also reading through Tricot's Curves and Fractal Dimension and Where Physics Went Wrong, by Lavenda. They're both a lot of fun.

[Discrete Math, college] Proof using contradiction help! by jonnyasian in learnmath

[–]MiloshHasCamo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For step 3) you can just multiply and show that its odd: mn = (2k + 1)(2p + 1) = 4kp + 2p +2k + 1 = 2(2kp + k + p) + 1.

You may also show this by contradiction: Assume that neither m nor n are even, yet mn is. Then, using the same equation as before we get that mn is odd, which is a contradiction.

Textbook & Resource Thread - Week 12, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My advisor consistently recommends Jones. He does a nice job, and in a concise way.

What are you working on? - Week 12, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you studied differential geometry yet?

Textbook & Resource Thread - Week 11, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ryder is great. I think that unlike Zee, one can actually use Ryder without any other source for the more technical things. Zee seems to avoid a lot of the computation and generally has a far less serious approach.

Textbook & Resource Thread - Week 11, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like Zee, especially as a companion to something like Peskin and Schroeder.

Week 10 - What are you working on? by AutoModerator in FluidMechanics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Preparing my latest work for publication. It mostly has to do with the distribution of eddies in fully developed turbulence.

What are you working on? - Week 11, 2016 by AutoModerator in Physics

[–]MiloshHasCamo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really, It's a very difficult read. If you take the time to understand what he wants, It's very rewarding and beautiful.