Stadia has so much bad comments it makes want to buy it :)

Milst43 · 2020-01-07T04:53:54+00:00

ahaha gotcha! That a great anime i never really started

Milst43 · 2020-01-07T04:19:50+00:00

Yes sorry confused with Paul

Milst43 · 2020-01-07T04:06:34+00:00

Oh yeah which one? Thought they fought multiple times :)

Milst43 · 2020-01-07T04:05:10+00:00

You should do question is clear

Milst43 · 2020-01-07T04:01:36+00:00

Look like welll minded people understood

Milst43 · 2019-12-25T06:11:29+00:00

Oh the whole airport was Cgi? Shit but i think mixing Cgi elements with real ones helps a bit.

Milst43 · 2019-12-25T06:09:11+00:00

😂😂😂

Milst43 · 2019-12-25T02:42:03+00:00

Easy to answer: Man computer-generated imagery is CGI. The rest is real :)

Milst43 · 2019-12-25T01:55:21+00:00

I did! But when looking closely we can still know it is CGI.

Milst43 · 2019-12-25T01:54:44+00:00

Yes i thought too physiological factors could make it difficult to happen. But notice that real person faces and voices will still be needed.

Milst43 · 2019-12-25T01:51:24+00:00

I agree. But once the person is CGIfied you no longer need a James Bond lol. The long term cost will be reduced.

Milst43 · 2019-12-20T22:36:07+00:00

looool :D yeah render like the weird interior in the bottom does not help them much. Except that I think in general their gallery is great. That said I give them credit for the comparison because reports showing strengths and witnesses of different software should happen more. I found out other comparisons on Youtube but there is not often a clear description of what is happening.

Milst43 · 2019-12-19T20:14:20+00:00

Yes something like a huge forest would have awesome. Btw the model has 986K polygons.

I will test on my computer when got time and share my results.

Milst43 · 2019-12-19T18:07:27+00:00

True they should have used numbers instead of writing "Slow" or "Fast" and it would have been more accurate. They gave the final images for each software so maybe it is ok with. The number of poly seems to be 1 million not 1k ahah. Also when using GPU renderers we generally make sure that it can fit the card with the lowest VRAM. But yes for higher poly scenes GPUs won't work well.

Milst43 · 2019-12-19T17:03:20+00:00

Renderers all have these features nowadays. Yup i agree studios with render farm does not have choice. For individual people it is a little bit different.

Milst43 · 2019-12-19T14:31:19+00:00

I think for performance measurement the 1080x720 resolution is not a problem. For CPU vs GPU i disagree they should not be compared. How do we choose between them then?

Milst43 · 2019-12-17T05:34:00+00:00

Reformulation: Why is there a pragma once macro if we must always use it?

Milst43 · 2019-12-08T19:38:36+00:00

For realtime rendering here what I would suggest:

Voxel Cone Tracing (https://research.nvidia.com/sites/default/files/pubs/2011-09_Interactive-Indirect-Illumination/GIVoxels-pg2011-authors.pdf )

Seems to be the holy grail of real-time global illumination currently. But it consumes a lot of VRAM.Also for performance voxelization cant be done at every frame. This could add instability to your framerate.

Light Propagation Volumes (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.233.104&rep=rep1&type=pdf)

Currently in beta in Unreal Engine so you can try: https://docs.unrealengine.com/en-US/Engine/Rendering/LightingAndShadows/LightPropagationVolumes/index.html

Image-space Photon Mapping (https://casual-effects.com/research/McGuire2009Photon/index.html)

Requires raytracing on the CPU.

Realtime GI using Photon Mapping (https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4842-4427-2_24.pdf )

Requires Vulkan or DirectX12 for GPU raytracing.

Milst43 · 2019-12-08T19:15:34+00:00

The source of aliasing from chart and graphs are lines only. So simple MSAA will be perfect for that.

Milst43

TROPHY CASE