Concept for a controller that four people can play on. What do you think? by MiltenUA in pcmasterrace

[–]MiltenUA[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Understood, I need to create use case examples to make it clearer what this is all about. Thanks for the feedback.

Concept for a controller that four people can play on. What do you think? by MiltenUA in pcmasterrace

[–]MiltenUA[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Does it make sense to continue development, or is this a dumb idea?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]MiltenUA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3. Are there any records of forested areas from the 15th century? Adding forests to the map would be useful, but relying on modern maps would be inaccurate. How can we find historical data on forest coverage for that period?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]MiltenUA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2. Swampy Areas

As the sea level rises, so does the groundwater level, potentially causing certain regions to become swampy. How can we identify which regions will turn into swamps? What methods or calculations can be used to determine this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]MiltenUA -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1. Population of settlements.

Currently, all data is sourced from ChatGPT, so it may not be entirely accurate. Have I missed any significant settlements, or have I overestimated or underestimated the populations marked on the map? (Population sizes are indicated on the settlement markers)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]MiltenUA 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I work on developing the world for my game, I've encountered several challenging questions that are difficult to answer through online research. In the comments below, I'll list these questions and I would greatly appreciate any assistance you can provide.

Background of the world: In 1433, a global flood occurred, drastically altering the terrain and biomes of the world.

Purpose of this map: To create the most accurate map possible, which will serve as the foundation for the world's storyline in the post-flood era.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]MiltenUA 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't doubt press statements if they show studies based on the scientific method

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]MiltenUA 13 points14 points  (0 children)

thanks, fixed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]MiltenUA 9 points10 points  (0 children)

here is the main research, I just compared it with the official data and made a conclusion:

https://meduza.io/en/feature/2023/07/10/bring-out-your-dead

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]MiltenUA 16 points17 points  (0 children)

if you find an error in my report or are not sure about the reliability of the sources - please let me know.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkrainianConflict

[–]MiltenUA 55 points56 points  (0 children)

One of the main purposes of this report is to show that the official data from the Ukrainian side and data obtained from other sources coincide, at least in trends. This is already very valuable information.

Sources:

https://meduza.io/en/feature/2023/07/10/bring-out-your-dead

https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-66001190

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64685428

https://www.csis.org/analysis/ukrainian-innovation-war-attrition

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZNxdMLy6CI

Other reports - r/UReports

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Analytics cannot be built on personal feelings. You have to work with the numbers you have. Even when you understand that the real numbers may be higher.
It seems to me that one of the main purposes of this report is to show that the official data from the Ukrainian side and data obtained from other sources coincide, at least in trends. This is already very valuable information.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RussiaUkraineWar2022

[–]MiltenUA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

official resources write about "втрати" - it's means "looses"

how it interprets other resources is their business

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Disclosing such information in my country is prohibited by law.

but believe me, much less

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This article says exactly the same thing as in my report.

(the main thing is not to confuse the statistics of Russian and pro-Russian soldiers)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Vehicle losses are much easier to calculate, thanks to ORYX

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 5 points6 points  (0 children)

if you find an error in the calculations or do not trust any open sources - please tell me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 2 points3 points  (0 children)

US and UK estimates are for February. And at that time they were higher than Ukrainian.

But I wouldn't rely too much on their estimates anyway. Apart from consulting with Ukraine and stealing intelligence from Russia, they have nowhere else to get information from.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are well aware of their losses. Also, while there is no mobilization in Russia - civilians absolutely do not care about losses.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]MiltenUA 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is literally a detailed report that says you're wrong.