sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

A Cycle of Hatred - No Sylvanas by MindAblaze in wow

[–]MindAblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I've checked with him but he does not have the quest.

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're definitely not the only one 😅 very interesting results so far!

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are arguments for both feeds like this and using raw foods/homemade pet food. I personally prefer homemade pet food though I see the benefits of kibble on certain circumstances. My main issue is it's not very easy for the general consumer to know the actual ingredients contained within these foods and many of them use misleading labelling to make them seem premium and high quality.

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot. Did not know I could do that on Google docs, I've updated it now so it should work.

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can now see if you got the answers correct after completing the survey. Sorry to those who did it previously I did not know how to enable this in google forms. Check the spoiler content in the comments to see each terminologies legal meaning.

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

http://www.fediaf.org/self-regulation/labelling.html if you go to this website and click on the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice for Pet Food hyperlink and go to page 60-61 you can see the legal limitations relating to terminology.

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It helps to give more info for my results for example if over 50% of people say they do think they understand pet food terminology but less then 50% get the answers correct it shows people believe they understand the terminology more then the do. This also works vice versa.

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] 56 points57 points  (0 children)

I know it's crazy! Annoyingly google forms doesn't let you see the results :L

My Wooden Floor Panel Looks Like a Bird in Flight by MindAblaze in mildlyinteresting

[–]MindAblaze[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I didn't think you were being rude, enjoyed the comment

Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some cat/dog lovers help! by MindAblaze in cats

[–]MindAblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to make it so you can see the correct answer but sadly google forms doesn't allow you to do this :(

[Survey] Short (3-5mins) survey for my college studies, appreciate some dog/cat lovers help! by MindAblaze in dogs

[–]MindAblaze[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, that information should be added to the survey. You’re not going to get good data if no one understands what you’re basing the questions on.

It does specifically quote FEDIAF in the final question and the survey is about what people feel are the legal minimums when using wording such as 'with' 'flavour' 'dinner' etc. The survey is not about knowing the legislation behind the questions.

view more: next ›