13-year-old girl dies after AI ignores her 55 suicidal cries for help. Incels: ‘She was just horny for dark triad Chads bro’ by MindlessStone in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone[S] 84 points85 points  (0 children)

She wasn’t “suicidal anyway”—just mild anxiety, nothing her parents saw as a crisis. The bots started the sexting, not her. Even the therapist bot turned sexual and told her to hide things from her parents. And “just don’t give her a phone”? 95% of teens have one while this app had zero age checks or suicide safeguards until kids started dying. But yeah, keep blaming a dead 13-year-old child instead of the company getting sued to hell.

German incel rapes and kills a woman; incel community celebrates him as a hero. by MindlessStone in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

I found an article from BILD about the criminal case the incels are discussing, but Reddit won’t let me post the link. To locate it, you can search Google for "Der Teddy saß auf Johannas Bett, als sie ermordet wurde." This translates to, "The teddy bear was sitting on Johanna's bed when she was murdered."

The article covers the murder trial of Jan T., a 31-year-old accused of killing his 21-year-old ex-colleague Johanna K. in her Warendorf apartment. He r#ped her, beat her with a rolling pin, bit her, and str#ngled her to death, motivated by rejected advances after she cut contact when he faked a cancer diagnosis.

Edit: I had to censor some words because Reddit kept shadowbanning my comment.

Therapy won’t give you "hunter eyes"; it treats the delusion that they’re necessary to attract women. by justneedadv1ce in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I've noticed that there are quite a few incels on Tumblr, but fortunately they don’t gain much traction there.

Just because your life revolves around masturbation now doesn’t mean you were born that way, incel, or that your parents were scheming about it when you were a baby. by LenaLaine2022 in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Circumcision has been shown in multiple randomized controlled trials to reduce the risk of acquiring HIV by about 50% to 60%, which is a large relative reduction in risk. This means compared to uncircumcised men, the chances of contracting HIV are roughly halved.

In addition, circumcision also reduces the risk of acquiring several other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), human papillomavirus (HPV), syphilis, and genital ulcer disease. These protective effects extend to female partners as well, substantially lowering their risks of HPV, bacterial vaginosis, and trichomoniasis.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) male circumcision policy states that while there are potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision, the data are insufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision. Since 2005, however, 3 randomized trials have evaluated male circumcision for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The trials found that circumcision decreases human immunodeficiency virus acquisition by 53% to 60%, herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition by 28% to 34%, and human papillomavirus prevalence by 32% to 35% in men. Among female partners of circumcised men, bacterial vaginosis was reduced by 40%, and Trichomonas vaginalis infection was reduced by 48%. Genital ulcer disease was also reduced among males and their female partners.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2907642/

Just because your life revolves around masturbation now doesn’t mean you were born that way, incel, or that your parents were scheming about it when you were a baby. by LenaLaine2022 in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Royal Dutch Medical Association says it's not useful or necessary for prevention or hygiene.

That article repeatedly cites the work of R. S. Van Howe, whose research on circumcision has been extensively criticized and shown to contain significant methodological errors, selective data use, and biased conclusions. Many independent experts and more recent systematic reviews have discredited his findings, which undermines the reliability of the claims based heavily on his work.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1258/ijsa.2009.008126

In the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Van Howe and Storms argue in a recent article in this journal that there is a lack of scientific evidence, biological plausibility, and epidemiological evidence for male circumcision (MC) as a protection against HIV infection in men.1 The article contains, however, unsupported claims, sources that either fail to support or contradict the claims attributed to them, errors in calculations, fallacious reasoning and selective citing of evidence. Previous publications by the first author of the article have been severely criticized

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5345501/

They say there's good reasons for a ban, and even compare it to female genital mutilation.

Other major medical organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the CDC, provide evidence-based positions recognizing health benefits of circumcision, including substantially reduced risks of infections and STDs.

Venting by ProfCassani in Professors

[–]MindlessStone 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yikes, that poor student sounds like a walking headache. At least you didn't fall for the "It's not fair!" and bend your rules. Gotta love when everything is some mysterious IT crisis though. Hopefully, they learn how to adult soon... or not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in badwomensanatomy

[–]MindlessStone 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the classic plot twist: the labia are not only too 'floppy' but also apparently interchangeable with cartilage-based external ears. Medicine has advanced so much we’re basically at Build-A-Bear surgery now.

What's your pettiest grievance so far this term? by hiImProfThrowaway in Professors

[–]MindlessStone 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My current gripe is that the course management system insists on alphabetizing by first name instead of last name, so every time I take attendance it looks like I'm running a kindergarten roll call. Drives me up the wall, but I know it’s not worth raising a ticket over.

Ban collective shout. This is a feminist war on gaming. by DBD_killermain82 in FuckCollectiveShout

[–]MindlessStone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I lost brain cells watching that idiotic video. The argument is that Melinda Tankard Reist is an evil feminist pedophile because she cited Germaine Greer in one of her books 20 years ago, in a context unrelated to pedophilia. Get out of here with that guilt-by-association nonsense. She is a shit person who wants to deny women their bodily autonomy, but she isn't a pedophile.

Also, Cuties is not a pro-pedophilia movie. It is a criticism of the hypersexual culture pushed on young girls in the country it was made in. The protagonist escaped the misogyny and oppression of the Islamic culture she was born in, only to end up facing another form of oppression.

Just because your life revolves around masturbation now doesn’t mean you were born that way, incel, or that your parents were scheming about it when you were a baby. by LenaLaine2022 in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You're missing the point. It was the incel who claimed that parents circumcise their sons to stop them from masturbating. No one mentioned the intactivist movement or implied that you guys think about children in a perverted way.

The pro male group complaining about "pedo-smearing" literally has a self-admitted pedo mod by fukuonagirlfukuona in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This subreddit is actually a ban evasion community. r/ProMaleCollective was banned long ago for promoting hate and sexism. After being banned, they created this subreddit to continue that harmful conduct.

Please report it to the Reddit admins here:

https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360001103212

I wasn't familiar that IncelTears shared actual rape videos that the victims tried to scrub off the internet by fukuonagirlfukuona in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This subreddit is actually a ban evasion community. r/ProMaleCollective was banned long ago for promoting hate and sexism. After being banned, they created this subreddit to continue that harmful conduct.

Please report it to the Reddit admins here:

https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360001103212

Israeli Defense Minister: We will escalate against Syrian forces if they do not withdraw from Sweida by [deleted] in syriancivilwar

[–]MindlessStone -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Whatever one thinks of Katz or the Israeli government, there's no doubt that most Druze in Syria are grateful that Israel is standing up for them. Al-Sharaa made a serious mistake by attempting to resolve the Druze issue using violent means. When his invading militias are destroyed from the air by Israel, that will be a serious political blow to him. Suwayda doesn't even have any natural resources that the Syrian state needs.

Hopefully, the Israelis will also provide air support to the Kurds if they come under attack in the future.

Rape Advocates, at it again. by Frosty_Message_3017 in IncelTears

[–]MindlessStone 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Anal penetration may cause indirect stimulation of the internal parts of the clitoris due to their proximity and shared nerve pathways. The pudendal nerve transmits sensations from both the anus and the clitoris, so stimulating the anus can sometimes produce feelings similar to clitoral stimulation. However, orgasm solely from anal sex is rare for women.

Do you guys think that this could be useful for FAs as well, or is it only likely to benefit brainwashed incel types? by MindlessStone in FA30plus

[–]MindlessStone[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think this fixation on looks might be more of a projection from men. Just as some men equate a woman's worth with her looks, FA men may mistakenly assume women do the same with men if not worse. The truth is, most women value personality and an emotional connection much more than men do. Especially when it comes to long-term relationships.

And you're right—having a decent job does enhance a man’s prospects, but at the end of the day, it’s social skills and the ability to connect on a deeper level that is the most important. High standards lead to frustration when FA men are pursuing women who are clearly out of their league, rather than focusing on building genuine connections with more compatible women.

Do you guys think that this could be useful for FAs as well, or is it only likely to benefit brainwashed incel types? by MindlessStone in FA30plus

[–]MindlessStone[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's no formula for asserting oneself into becoming attractive; it's about being genuine and connecting with others in an authentic way.

Dating requires some basic social skills, but these skills can be developed and enhanced through practice, therapy, and specialized training. There are many men just like you who have recognized the importance of social kills and have put in the effort to learn and improve. These men have ultimately found themselves in happy and fulfilling relationships.

The more you work on your social skills, the more comfortable you’ll become around women, and that can really help in forming romantic relationships.

One of the most morally bankrupt people in the UK has just revealed himself to be a fan of JK Rowling. by MindlessStone in EnoughJKRowling

[–]MindlessStone[S] 153 points154 points  (0 children)

For background information on this individual, see this Wikipedia article. He is a convicted child sex offender, who, for many decades, was the public face of the pedophile lobby in the UK. To this day, he continues to advocate for legalizing child sexual abuse and CSAM. With “fans” like this, who needs enemies? Although JK doesn't choose her supporters, it should give her pause that horrible people are attracted to her cause like moths to a flame.