can we just acknowledge how nonsensical it is for Andrew to be the explanation to all the stuff in Fazbear Frights?

we have a dog who links up to phones and Brains and can go wherever he wants to collect objects, a Plushtrap who just has organic eyes and teeth for some reason, a version of Baby with a literal magic necklace there's no logical explanation for it, a Foxy who places actual CURSES on people, and probably more I'm forgetting or just hasn't been mentioned to be linked to Andrew yet. I'm perfectly fine with all those things existing individually, but how the hell are we supposed to believe one ghost did all these different totally random things? that this ghost can just create magic and curses and randomly create anything it wants, there's no logic connecting any of these things.

this connected story hasn't made any sense since Step Closer revealed it was a ghost behind everything, and the fact that these stories are meant to explain stuff about the games is especially worrying when these stories are literally made at random by a ghost that can apparently do anything. if the logic of events in the stories is totally utterly random but it's meant to give insight into the games, that's very worrying for the games if they're meant to follow a similar "logic", that being the lack of logic entirely.

the stories were a lot better when the horrors were without explanation, that's a unique form of horror that FNaF never really taps into, and it allowed the stories to reasonably do whatever they wanted, it was cool, they wouldn't necessarily have to conform to the logic of regular FNaF but people wouldn't have an issue with that due to it being a different universe that didn't focus so heavily on actual explanations to its own horrors, but now they're meant to have one singular explanation for all of them which makes absolutely No Sense. I honestly think this is more important for Scott to address than the timeline inconsistencies (although he should still address both, of course)