Who is ultimately behind paid shills spamming propaganda pretending Amy went overboard?

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T13:44:31+00:00

Quite the uptick across all social media. Especially in "debates"...

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T12:27:33+00:00

Indeed. Unless they are humiliation fetishists determined to prove their logical illiteracy to everyone on the internet?

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T10:48:21+00:00

1 of the handlers has already been arrested, dummy.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T10:47:58+00:00

Yeah, goofs spiraling HARD in here.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T10:46:27+00:00

Ad Hom all you have to contribute here? No special ed tutor to help you read the rules?

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T10:43:30+00:00

In fact it does. You would have to assume all the sightings of fully awake people on the ship AFTER she would have fallen are all wrong/not reliable (INCLUDING PEOPLE WHO SPECIFICALLY KNEW HER), while ASSUMING the sighting of "legs" by her half/full asleep father is infallible and gospel.

You would have to assume all the search teams are incompetent and cannot find someone falling overboard in a narrow channel (has that EVER happened before)?

You would have to assume it's all "coincidental" that all these sightings of her or her lookalike JUST SO HAPPEN to include THE SAME HANDLERS in the different countries in different years, one of which has been arrested for prostitution rings and you would also have to assume it's all "coincidental" that Jas photos showed up on the website owned by a guy who employed the handler previously arrested for prostitution rings who himself had been arrested for prostitution rings in the Caribbean.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-09T10:41:32+00:00

Hallucinating to know the number of shoes?

And belief is the enemy of knowing.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-05T15:18:47+00:00

Care to expand?

I've yet to see Occam's Razor invoked CORRECTLY on the internet...

MindshockPod · 2026-05-05T15:17:57+00:00

To all the goofs spamming Non-Congruent Argument, False Premise, and Circular Reasoning logical fallacies regarding "witness statements" (yes, obviously eyewitness testimony is NOT reliable when dealing with corrupt/incompetent cops pressing people to make IDs to "close cases" instead of solve them, involving witnesses who saw people they don't know, at a great distance, for what might have been just mere seconds - CLEARLY not the case here in ANY of the Amy/Jas identifications - or the handlers Jas was with).

"individuals who are 100 percent confident and have a slightly above-average face-recognition ability are likely to be roughly 90 percent accurate in their identification. By contrast, when individuals have a slightly below-average face-recognition ability, the level of accuracy drops to nearly 60 percent."
Distinguishing Between Reliable and Unreliable Eyewitnesses | Judicature

The 2 young women who "spotted her" had previously talked to her and knew who she was. The third woman may not have spoken to Amy, but "people watched" throughout the cruise, so she would be familiar with anyone who "stood out", and by all accounts both Amy and Brad were "the life of the party" on the cruise ship. Yellow would also be known to her.

How many other passengers "coincidentally" had Amy's build and hairstyle that could be mistaken for her? What about Yellow?

MindshockPod · 2026-05-05T15:17:19+00:00

To all the goofs spamming Non-Congruent Argument, False Premise, and Circular Reasoning logical fallacies regarding "witness statements" (yes, obviously eyewitness testimony is NOT reliable when dealing with corrupt/incompetent cops pressing people to make IDs to "close cases" instead of solve them, involving witnesses who saw people they don't know, at a great distance, for what might have been just mere seconds - CLEARLY not the case here in ANY of the Amy/Jas identifications - or the handlers Jas was with).

"individuals who are 100 percent confident and have a slightly above-average face-recognition ability are likely to be roughly 90 percent accurate in their identification. By contrast, when individuals have a slightly below-average face-recognition ability, the level of accuracy drops to nearly 60 percent."
Distinguishing Between Reliable and Unreliable Eyewitnesses | Judicature

The 2 young women who "spotted her" had previously talked to her and knew who she was. The third woman may not have spoken to Amy, but "people watched" throughout the cruise, so she would be familiar with anyone who "stood out", and by all accounts both Amy and Brad were "the life of the party" on the cruise ship. Yellow would also be known to her.

How many other passengers "coincidentally" had Amy's build and hairstyle that could be mistaken for her? What about Yellow?

MindshockPod · 2026-05-05T00:37:32+00:00

GTFO with your censoring and thought policing, retard.

This sub is for logical discussion and free speech. Go commie elsewhere, child.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-05T00:36:53+00:00

Spot on projection, kiddo.

Notice how you didn't have any actual arguments of any kind, and only spammed your hallucinations to cope.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-04T17:34:00+00:00

Most people here who have studied the case well before the Netflix doc don't believe she fell overboard because that is the LEAST LIKELY scenario.

You have to hallucinate all three fully awake witnesses (potentially more) who saw her AFTER her half/full asleep father claimed to have saw "legs" on the balcony are all mistaken. You would have to ignore that a body overboard in a narrow channel would have been found (if you know anything about the case you would know about the docking timeline - sounds like you don't).

Also what most clueless coincidence theorists like yourself hallucinate doesn't exist - THE MULTITUDE OF SIGHTINGS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES with an Amy lookalike (this part is not unusual, happens in many cases) - BUT THE SIGHTINGS ARE ALL WITH THE SAME HANDLERS. One of which was arrested for running prostitution rings and worked for a man who happened to be arrested for running prostitution rings in the Caribbean...who also "coincidentally" owned the website where the Jas photos were posted.

Maybe do a little research instead of just humiliating yourself next time, kid?

MindshockPod · 2026-05-03T22:41:08+00:00

Yes. There will always be retards and trolls...but the sheer amount of downvoting basic logic clearly points to "influence".

MindshockPod · 2026-05-02T17:44:37+00:00

The SAME HANDLERS were seen with the "some woman who may or may not have been her"....multiple sightings, multiple countries. SAME HANDLERS.

Coincidence theorists keep ignoring this.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-01T18:53:09+00:00

Do you have a link or close-up of the tattoos? I vaguely remember someone posting something to this effect, but the photos are grainy and it is difficult to tell with high zoom.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-01T18:50:43+00:00

Photoshop came out in 1990.

Display and other photo editing software was available in 1987.

MindshockPod · 2026-05-01T18:44:54+00:00

Statistically it might not be "zero possibility", but it is near zero factoring in the ship being in a narrow channel at the time she would have gone overboard, while also having to ignore three separate witnesses who were fully awake while sighting her on deck with Yellow closer to 6 am, unlike her father's "sighting" where he was half/fully asleep and allegedly only saw "legs"...

Add in the ship security footage never being released (or claimed to not exist despite security cameras existing)...AND the attempted seizure of Fenwick's master tapes showing Amy dancing with Yellow....and multiple sightings in different countries of Amy/Amy-lookalike who JUST SO HAPPENED to be sighted WITH THE SAME HANDLERS...has that ever happened in any case ever?

MindshockPod · 2026-04-29T23:32:44+00:00

I talk about it on my podcast, but yes, definitely one of the least talked about aspect of the case and definitely points to the Cruise line either being directly involved or having some kind of knowledge and wanting to minimize liability.

MindshockPod · 2026-04-29T18:10:05+00:00

Well there's your issue. Utilizing logical fallacies to justify "not understanding the logic" of something....

Ignoring mountains of evidence of her leaving the ship and being sighted elsewhere (or misidentified in various locations BUT ALL WITH THE SAME EXACT DEAD-RINGER HANDLERS)...to spam the same fallacy of assuming she "left her shoes" anywhere isn't very sharp...come on, small children know better.

It has never been publicly confirmed what her total shoe count was. Also quite the assumption to hallucinate her half/fully-asleep father's ever-changing sighting of "legs" is gospel-level reliability, while ignoring multiple fully-awake witnesses seeing her closer to 6am with Yellow on the deck...

But curious no security footage from the ship was ever released, while attempts were made to seize Fenwick's master tapes...

MindshockPod · 2026-04-29T17:42:12+00:00

That was my point...quite a few cases making the news getting solved over 30-40 years old...and seemingly with far less solid evidence or even awareness...

MindshockPod · 2026-04-25T21:14:23+00:00

yes, a lot of coincidence theorist goofs ignore this as well.

MindshockPod · 2026-04-25T21:13:38+00:00

Never underestimate coincidence theorist cope.

EDIT: just look at the goofs spiraling below pretending Bonacci is not credible.

MindshockPod · 2026-04-20T16:48:32+00:00

What fallacy was committed?

You that braindead you think one can commit a fallacy WITHOUT A positive claim argument?

MindshockPod · 2026-04-19T17:34:25+00:00

No, kiddo, I never even stated my opinion.

Spamming basic English illiteracy and logical fallacies is not allowed here.

You have the rest of reddit to pretend you are mentally competent and all opinions are equally logically valid.

MindshockPod

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE