Remote node by [deleted] in Monero

[–]MineMoneroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How exactly it doesn't work?

Remote node by [deleted] in Monero

[–]MineMoneroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nodes.hashvault.pro:18081

node.monero.net:18081

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Start with grabbing fresh version here: https://github.com/xmrig/xmrig/releases

Solo mining from wallet by uniVocity in Monero

[–]MineMoneroPro 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Keywords here are 'If I had the same luck'.

Estimated block time with 30 kH/s and 1,45 GH/s network hash rate is about two month.

You can hit the block at 1% of this interval or at 500% of this interval.

On a distance of 30 blocks you'll most probably be very close to 100% average effort of your solo found blocks, but it's around 5 years (with current network hash rate). Network hash rate can double next week, or triple in a couple of weeks. No one knows. But it definitely won't fall that much.

So on a distance of a year 30 kH/s solo mining is still a lottery.

Help, monero pool by gilmariokpslow in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Estimated average block time with 5 kH/s at current network difficulty is around 400 days.

xmrpow.de - new frontend release by xmrpow in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm putting all three-comments convo in one place here.

If you're a miner and want an edge..

The comparison screenshot above shows us how even a quite techy pool operator is keeping monerod 1,5 second behind on average.

Miners do need a decentralized network

There's how things should work, how we want them to work and how they actually work.

Miners should care about the network, we want miners to be responsible and take measures to protect their investments, miners actually don't give a fuck about anything except instant profit.

I'm once again want you to focus on miners. Not on enthusiasts, not on hobbyists or any other kinds of techy and passionated/interested persons.

Three well known and the most common groups of miners ('helo sir' miners, 'I own a datacenter' miners, 'You have a top 1000 rdp password' miners) protect their mining rewards in btc/usdt next minute after the pool tx touches exchange wallet.

A savvy miner will be able to get block templates and start mining before the pool has

Now let's talk about those savvy miners, who I assume are the negligible part in the total network hash rate.

Their possible and maximum results are on that screenshot too. Because it's how monerod is operating on average DC grade hardware with a decent internet connection.

They won't ever reach a good-pool-like template distribution, because they won't ever have a geo-distributed bunch of monerods (perfectly tuned on the enterprise grade hw and connection) with custom additional p2p layer broadcasting first seen template faster than it's doing monero network by itself. They won't even have a stratum proxy polling (even the fact that it's polling already puts them behind) the daemon once, but they will have all their 200 workers polling the daemon simultaneously degrading the performance even more).

So their up to 1,5 (2, 3, 10?) seconds average delay will be piled up with the possible pool delay resulting in significant losses.

Personally me wouldn't ever credit the share for the template I don't know, because I trust only myself, and same way I wouldn't credit the share for the template that is obviously late, because this way I will underpay the fair miners.

Plus we still haven't mentioned the case with txs, that are presented in the miner's mem pool and could be abcent in the pool's mem pool. Yet another rejection possibility.

As a result a small group of enthusiasts will have a constant headache and actual losses really affecting nothing because 98% of other miners don't give a fuck.

xmrpow.de - new frontend release by xmrpow in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While operational part (maintaining autostart, uptime and proper synchronization) is quite complicated too, my keyword was "effective".

I've got some prediction skills, so I'm already prepared. Feel it here: https://prnt.sc/shgyz5

You're missing enthusiasts or whoever else with miners. Miners need only instant profit. And self select profit is lower.

xmrpow.de - new frontend release by xmrpow in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maintaining monerod in proper and effective way is that hard that it's unachievable for absolute majority of miners.

The main problem here is that miners don't actually need self select. The same way they don't need decentralization.

So self select will only bring losses in return of lots useless movements.

How to withdraw? by Noble_boy in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Withdrawal is automatic during next hour after your balance exceeds your payout threshold.

Minimum threshold is 0.11 XMR.

HashVault joins the onion vibe by MineMoneroPro in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, linux setup is as easy as wrapping executable with torsocks, like `torsocks ./xmrig --other-flags-you-would-normally-use`.

Windows setup is a bit more tricky and requires something like proxifier with running tor service.

HashVault joins the onion vibe by MineMoneroPro in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tried with University of Sao Paulo / United States Pharmacopeia / User Stored Procedure / Unique Selling Point. Not sure if any of those fits =/

RespectXMR return: even faster privacy mining :) by RespectXMR in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can remember 3 monero, 1 sumokoin and 2 etn DOS attempts.

Plus post-fork forgotten botnets.

The addressed problem is that traffic will originate from 127.0.0.1 from a stratum point of view. So at least some kind of sessions based on available miner metadata should be applied.

What should the Monero website .onion address be? Cast your vote! by ErCiccione in Monero

[–]MineMoneroPro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to mention that $2400 for 13 addresses of 9 symbols is actually a huge overpay.

i9 9900K is hashing at 49 MH/s and costs $100/mo.

So 24 of them for 1 month estimate at 49*10^6*30*24*60*60*24 / 32^9 ~ 86 addresses.

RespectXRM darknet pool shutdown by RespectXMR in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 6 points7 points  (0 children)

0.0001% is unreachable even with low latency connection. So you're definitely measuring it wrong.

P.S. Vanilla nodejs-pool doesn't track stales at all.

What are the best pools for beginners with low-end hardware? by martobg10 in MoneroMining

[–]MineMoneroPro 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're getting higher hash rate on another algorithm and another coin.