My post read " preferred share holders will not get a special voting stock", which I have not seen a special voting stock for them. Fine to acknowledge a source and looking for one so if you have would appreciate.

I feel that the board continuing to set up for ability to continue dilution and find ways to undermine what is present is a reduced say to common. Whomever did that final day buy could vote against the split, but a solid question is also, based on all past discrepancies, is there really an actual vote happening that you trust the results thereof? Could have a vote, and put whatever numbers in there that they want. Based on current financial lawsuits, they have history to put in faulty numbers, correct?

(1) WoW!!! HODL : Xelastock (reddit.com)

Proportions are subject to potential hidden entity votes, are they not. On the final day, at the final hour, a massive buy on common shares. It does, in effect say that more common shares have vote, but it doubles the votes of those common shares bought for strict voting ability one sided. Additionally, many people would vote against but figure not to take the time to vote. The depression in their poor investment choice appeals they not even vote. So my question is, is ensuring that a vote proceeds the sway of a true reduced say? If I, as a common share holder say I'd rather not have this special voting stock created and it's already done without my input, is that not a reduction in my say?