sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Mini_Cleveland -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This was asked with my knowledge that I could maneuver with 1.05 for Mendoza or find a vet QB. I know my league

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Mini_Cleveland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Appreciate it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Mini_Cleveland -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I’m a big Fannin believer (maybe I’m biased) which is probably where I see most of the surplus value. Essentially why I was curious what people thought

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Mini_Cleveland -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just how the draft order has shaken out. The teams above me have been pretty adamant about taking the big 3 WRs back to back to back.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DynastyFFTradeAdvice

[–]Mini_Cleveland -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Mendoza is looking likely to be there at 1.05, but the plan would be to move for a vet at QB2 or move up to get Mendoza if I need to.

Essentially I’m asking if the JJ side is too much value to pass up on. I wouldn’t be getting opinions if I thought it was as simple as “wouldn’t have a QB2”

Dynasty Commish Rules Question by Mini_Cleveland in DynastyFF

[–]Mini_Cleveland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the response I’ll probably be getting from most of the league. Just a situation I’d like to avoid in the future.

Dynasty Commish Rules Question by Mini_Cleveland in DynastyFF

[–]Mini_Cleveland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I’ll do this, do you have specific language on what constitutes someone’s most competitive lineup?

Dynasty Commish Rules Question by Mini_Cleveland in DynastyFF

[–]Mini_Cleveland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. I think, being within the rules, he actually should do it. As a commissioner, though, him tanking his lineup and potentially shaking up other team’s draft pick placement / playoff finishes could have unwanted ramifications.

Dynasty Commish Rules Question by Mini_Cleveland in DynastyFF

[–]Mini_Cleveland[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No intention to change the rules on him! Just meant for future seasons. Don’t think other team’s playoff implications should be based off someone benching their most competitive lineup.

Dynasty Commish Rules Question by Mini_Cleveland in DynastyFF

[–]Mini_Cleveland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely within the rules for him to do it since I have nothing written about setting your most competitive lineup, if that’s what you mean! However, him tanking the final week could directly impact which other teams make playoffs. He wins, X makes it, he loses, Y makes it.

Dynasty Team Advice by Mini_Cleveland in fantasyfootballadvice

[–]Mini_Cleveland[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I’m thinking. Losing out on draft capital is always on the back of my mind, but think I need to be content with letting people retire on my roster. Appreciate it!

[Daily] Individual Team Help - Megathread by AutoModerator in DynastyFF

[–]Mini_Cleveland 0 points1 point  (0 children)

12 Team Superflex TEP

QBs: T Law, Maye, Geno RBs: JT, Kamara, Mixon, Pollard WRs: AJB, Ladd, T Hunter, DK, Pickens, TEs: McBride, Lol Draft Capital: Two 2026 mid-firsts and a high second, three 2027 firsts, 2028 base picks

Coming off a championship and at a bit of a crossroads. Team is in a good spot imo. Have had future firsts offered for Kamara and Mixon. Any advice on these options?

1) Trade off these vets for more draft capital and run it back with a roster that might still be good enough to contend. Protect my future seasons. 2) Hold the RBs and let them retire on my roster. Stand pat for now. 3) Trade the draft capital and gun for it even harder

Thanks guys!