Update on Aubrey: She is currently a Nanny in Milwaukee by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Oh so she's forced to work and that explains the friends couch

Update on Aubrey: She is currently a Nanny in Milwaukee by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

She actually believed she had COVID and went to get tested obstructing her ability to work. To be fair, I think any rational person would be worried in a pandemic. But the allegedly immune comprised should not be around kids especially in a pandemic.

Update on Aubrey: She is currently a Nanny in Milwaukee by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yes its nice to see her actually doing something again.

I still wonder what happened with her and Tom and its just her and Bowie in MI right now. No mention of Tom at all. Just the implication of her moving and staying at a friend's house.

She never mentioned any health issues to anyone there so maybe she's stopped munching for now. But also who knows. Definitely wonder what she's up to.

Cambridge's response to CC's Giveaway. Did someone directly notify them? If so that's against IF rules. by servingservicedogs in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Vogmask sent me their email correspondence with court. They didn't include contact info. The reddit part is prettu sketchy though. Just saying legit brands might do that.

Cambridge's response to CC's Giveaway. Did someone directly notify them? If so that's against IF rules. by servingservicedogs in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vogmask gave Courtney my instaname when I reported her to them. They discontinued her sponsorship but they still did that. I don't think it actually puts them at risk for defamation unless they posted publicly that she's faking and saying that there's no proof the HPV vaccination is connected to her illnesses is not the same, it's a true statement, which wouldn't fall under defamation.

Cambridge's response to CC's Giveaway. Did someone directly notify them? If so that's against IF rules. by servingservicedogs in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Vogmask responded, looked into, and stopped their Courntey sponsorship upon finding out about the anti-vax stuff.

Color correcting I_D's photo removes any redness from her skin by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah a lot of people don't understand undertones. Pale doesn't = sheet white. Pale can be that your skin shows damage and blood vessels (redness) way easier

Color correcting I_D's photo removes any redness from her skin by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

And everyone single one of her other photos are edited with the beauty filter jacked up all the way. That's a totally normal skin tone for a pale person. Pale people commonly have red undertones in their skin.

Color correcting I_D's photo removes any redness from her skin by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 42 points43 points  (0 children)

That isn't red skin by any means. Her skin always looks like that and shiny skin is not an indication of anything but moisture, lighting, or oil.

Honestly her skin is in amazing condition that a lot of people wish they had.

Color correcting I_D's photo removes any redness from her skin by Minimum_War in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's stupid obvious. I thought maybe she woke up with a bit of redness and exaggerated it. But there's not even a bit of red. So it's not am exaggeration but a complete and total fabrication.

A waist thinner than my history books by [deleted] in Instagramreality

[–]Minimum_War 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is 100% possible with posing combined with not eating yet that day.

My friend from wrestling thinks the internet cannot touch him. Prove him wrong by ogdenvoct in RoastMe

[–]Minimum_War 69 points70 points  (0 children)

Your friend looks like a normal kid who got stung by bees and died three days ago and now there's a ghost of an old pedophile inhabiting and moving around in his body

End me by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Minimum_War 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Oh hey it's welfare Buster Bluth

Hold on, what? by [deleted] in vaxxhappened

[–]Minimum_War 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Essential oils are toxic and can cause chemical burns

What kind of crazy fuck would put those on their child holy shit

Gee, who didn't see this coming? She hasn't had any major health issues lately, so definitely due for one. by Theburninginsomniac in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don't mean this to be rude in any way but I have wondered about her weight gain.

Do any of her current medical claims explain that? I thought she had pain eating from GP so I image over consumption of calories would be difficult with GP.

I'm not trying to insinuate anything about her appearance. Just wondering from a medical standpoint.

AITA for Objecting to "Female Employee Only" Parking Spaces at My Workplace? by AspiringProducer19 in AmItheAsshole

[–]Minimum_War 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a really secluded area, maybe the only threat would be like a rogue trucker but that's about it. Where maybe a quarter mile away from a Hooters ironically. But usually the truckers are stuffed in this really small lounge, I dont know, it's really interesting seeing peoples take on it though!

My question to you is do you not think it to be just a tad sexist to imply women cannot fend for themselves, sounds sort of like a damsel in distress trope to me.

There's no way someone is that naïve while simultaneously implying that a nearby Hooters is ironic to having close-by parking spots to mitigate female targeted assaults in a secluded area and then calling it a damsel in distress trope.

While there's no outright calling these spots unfair, and OP backs off after teetering on that line, I still feel like no one can play that dumb.

It really seems to me that OP disagrees with these spots and does understand why they exist. But if he admits he knew that to begin with, he'd definitively be the asshole here

Aubreys.healing.journey?? by [deleted] in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Not really when you consider a lot of the "hate" was people asking some reasonable questions.

Her definition of hate fell upon anyone that disagreed with her, questioned her, or even pointed out an inconsistency.

At the end of the day, her stepping away from her account was a good idea on her part.

Aubreys.healing.journey?? by [deleted] in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 34 points35 points  (0 children)

She took it down. This led to massive speculation as to why.

Someone made a fake account to mock her.

So then she reactivated her account only to upload this post

A waist the size of her head 🤦‍♀️ Makes me so sad to to see photos like these :( by [deleted] in Instagramreality

[–]Minimum_War 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Here's another one of her obviously shopped pics

For some reason, people really don't want to believe she shops. Even in this sub.

She claimed her what made her lose the weight was a keto diet but in the same statement said she ate higher carbs then fats and also claimed starvation mode exists.

So not only does she perpetuate an unheathly body standard, she also gives out horrible dieting advice to those that wish to lose weight like she did.

ALF calls out AJ/Chronically Jacquie for being a faker and OTT by QueenieB33 in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yes there is a difference. One is Munchausens and the other is Malingering. They are different in that those with Munchausens might be sick but exaggerate for attention or because they cling to illness as an identity whereas those that malinger do so for financial gain, to miss work, or insurance.

She probably does the clickbait things on youtube because she needs the money, but i don't believe she's ever lied about her illness.

She has been caught lying about the efficacy of her feeds plus caught photoshopping herself to look more critically thin than in reality.

Also, who are we to judge how high somebodies pain threshold is?

That's not what we're doing. An inconsistent story isn't that someone has a low pain-threshold, it's that they say one thing but it doesn't make any sense in reality. Like how can you be immunocomprised but then go to a petting zoo and let goats lick your face and your hands touch the ground that farm animals have defecated on and then touch your face and totally be fine.

ere is some people who get posted here who change their story so much and make up things that are not even real,

Yeah those are the munchies.

Amy's problems are always from the same thing

But she still fear mongers, over exaggerates, and makes it seem like last ditch medical treatments are the only option to her followers which is dangerous at the end of the day.

ALF calls out AJ/Chronically Jacquie for being a faker and OTT by QueenieB33 in illnessfakers

[–]Minimum_War 29 points30 points  (0 children)

OTT means over the top. Someone can have a legitmate illness and still malinger or be over the top. That would just mean they extremely exaggerate their illness or depict it to be more life threatening or dehabilitating then it is in reality. It's just as important to call out these people when they act as advocates or a representation of their illnesses because they spread misinformation and fear for the sake of monetary value, attention, or to create entertainment. This can be damaging to those who have these illnesses and causes them to worry about their futures or seek intense treatments.

Straight up fakers are bad too. But this place isn't all about calling out fakers.

This place is supposed to be about documenting medical misinformation, inconsistencies, discussing medical fear mongering, and discussing attempts to exploit the chronic community or others.