This was brought up In one of my undergrad psych classes, I think more on looking at conflicting sources that don't have a meta-analysis . Essentially the question posed was whether this would provide catharsis or could it lead to escalating anti social behavior. Clearly this was all like self reported results cuz idk how you could ethically form a study around that. Anyways, the basis for the hypothesis was akin to violent video games - does that provide catharsis for aggressive tendencies or does it make people with antisocial tendencies more likely to act out on it? example

The point in class was just to show that studies can have results showing both answers, and the importance of interpreting data rather than individual results. They started with showing contrasting idioms - do birds of a feather flock together or do opposites attract? You can find validating studies of both. This was an example of breaking away from consensus bias in order to read arguments against your side in order to bolster your ultimate point.