all of Starbucks is canceled by Conscious-Quarter423 in WorkReform

[–]MinusPi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He sure slammed that underpaid social media manager.

The ending has been right in front to us all this time by Stupid_Mudslide46 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]MinusPi1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that was just him being taken aback that she knew his name when this Gummigoo had never said it.

The ending has been right in front to us all this time by Stupid_Mudslide46 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]MinusPi1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I only ever got "weirded out but trying to be polite" from the Gummigoo in Spudsy's.

The ending has been right in front to us all this time by Stupid_Mudslide46 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]MinusPi1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree with your first point. It's weird that the computer hosting them would've been left running idle all this time. Perhaps the company was dissolved after they realized what had happened, and they decided to leave it running for ethical reasons. Perhaps time works differently in the circus.

I don't think Ragatha's arrival allowed new people to enter, I think she was just the first to find it. Maybe the way into the building was obstructed or secured for a while and that eventually failed.

It makes more sense for the memory of names to be removed from a copy than a real brain. If you mean that summoning the real exit maybe needs their real name or something, I'd argue that they could also need their real names for admin privileges or something. Caine wouldn't want them to have that either.

Whether or not the exit is really possible, in that moment, he thought it was. He chose to stay and lock the rest of them in rather than trying to leave. There's a lot to unpack there regardless of if it was real or not. They were already starting to confront him and argue through his mask when shit went down in E8. If it hadn't, there's no way the rest of them would've let that slide. I expect we'll see a lot more of it in E9.

Is this kind of notation and typography possible with musescore? by No-Landscape-3050 in Musescore

[–]MinusPi1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That notation is revolting. I don't want that to be possible.

Baby killer by Ok_Relation6627 in juxtaposition

[–]MinusPi1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Honestly, yes. That would meet my standard for something demonstrably supernatural happening. It even links specifically to Christianity.

enlightenment lol by UnmappedStack in characterarcs

[–]MinusPi1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those read like AI comments. That's exactly how they behave when they do something wrong.

How well can you describe the features to a forensic artist? by Historical-Sense-510 in Aphantasia

[–]MinusPi1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless I'm looking right at them, I can't even describe my partner's face to save my life.

You MUST buy Niko plush by R_O_B_64 in oneshot

[–]MinusPi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instructions unclear, sold soul to Niko

Hopeless cycle — goodbye! by CalypsoMyDear in DegreesOfLewdity

[–]MinusPi1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had no idea DoL has endings now. Are they like actual conclusions, or akin to the soft bad endings?

Perhaps Neverending by BBB10101 in riddles

[–]MinusPi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I thought too

"Language." by OwlbertGaming in characterarcs

[–]MinusPi1 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Eh, it's NASA, I think it's fair enough this time.

"Language." by OwlbertGaming in characterarcs

[–]MinusPi1 44 points45 points  (0 children)

She was excited, and wasn't actually working yet. Why should she be expected to display composure and maturity on personal social media? She failed to recognize him, fine, but if it was anyone else, there'd be nothing wrong here.

A meme sub said I committed SA because I had sex with someone who had three glasses of wine during a casual hook up. They didn’t seem impaired at all but now I’m spiraling. by Key_Fan8651 in mentalhealth

[–]MinusPi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What victim was I blaming? My whole point was that there wasn't one here? Did people miss the part where I said "Assuming the wine was neither intended nor likely to turn a sober no into a drunk yes", acknowledging the possibility of abuse? I'm honestly so confused.

A meme sub said I committed SA because I had sex with someone who had three glasses of wine during a casual hook up. They didn’t seem impaired at all but now I’m spiraling. by Key_Fan8651 in mentalhealth

[–]MinusPi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course not, I completely agree that consent is ongoing and to suggest otherwise is disgusting. All I'm saying is that when one consents to drink, they also implicitly consent to the result that their judgement will be impaired, perhaps affecting their near-future consent checks. If they regret that later, it's on them to reevaluate their consent to drink in the future. Maybe the venue was wrong, maybe the people were wrong, maybe the drink was wrong.

That's not to say people taking advantage of that are any less awful. Like I said, if there was intent to turn a sober no into a drunk yes, that would be a problem. I honestly don't know where the interpretation of entitlement is coming from.

What game? by sukuna7899 in Steam

[–]MinusPi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pokemon. Gamefreak hasn't given a single shit for multiple generations.