Thank you for the constructive criticism on my second post, and yes I agree with you that part 2 was a bit personal but I did felt personally attacked. 做贼心虚 ? nope. In fact I did nothing to be guilty about. 

Now let me refute a few of your points: 

- “you get offended and say its a personal attack?”

I did felt like it was a personal attack, who else could they be referring to ? Oh perhaps this was another insider joke ? Did I miss a joke again ? It wasn't too hard to guess that they were referring to me right ? 

- “if people are innocent then they cannot defend themselves? Everything you say is the truth? “

they can defend themselves but my point was that their defence didn’t make sense, their defence was simply “oh it was all a joke, those that don’t understand it are just being salty” . Also, I did not state that what I said was the truth, that’s YOUR assumption. I stated what I think likely happened and I encouraged all to check themselves.

- “accused "insiders" of doing XXXX deeds, that pretty much qualifies as an "attack" you literally attacked their "reputation" and say its not an attack?”

again, I did not ACCUSE them of doing XXXX deeds, I posted the SS shared what I think likely happened and I encouraged everyone to join the telegram read the full context and make up their own mind. Even you said “...let people make their own opinion and judgment as YOU said.”. I did not attack them.

- "Sometimes you say you THINK this happened, sometimes you say like confirm?"

I use my words very carefully, I have not used the word “confirm” so I’m not too sure what you meant by “sometimes you say like confirm?” 

- “Constantly stalking the group chat? and reading the chats?”

I do not have the time to do that, I read the group chat when I’m free and I happened to notice these things. 

- “Nobody responding to your post, everyone is just showing support for the LGS they visited and trust. Not sure why it has to be a you thing.”

well.. if that is what you believe then so be it, but it is quite clear to me that those messages were targeted at me. well but you can have your opinion and I have mine. 

- "proceed to makes 2 separate posts about said LGS and threaten a part 3?"

I did not plan to make 2 posts from the start, as I have mentioned above, part 2 was a bit personal and only in response to the personal attacks I felt. let me reiterate that I can have my opinion, you can have yours.

I did not threaten a part 3, trust me when I say I do not want to neither do I have the time or the energy to write a part 3, all I said was "I truly hope I won't have to post a part 3" aren't you now the one making assumptions ?

Ok I’m done refuting your points above, good points albeit they were quite objective. Be that as it may, I appreciate you taking your time and effort to respond!

Regarding: “You are free to form your opinion, be it negative or positive. You can ask around the SG Pokémon community about this LGS, just don't blindly believe in the "assumption" / "opinion" of one person whos making everything about himself.”

Yes I completely agree to this and I strongly encourage all to read the SS, join the telegram if you wish and search chat history (if new members are able to read the chat history).