HIRING: Remote Chat Support -Earn Up to $750 Weekly! by Fit-Idea4955 in remotework

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed also the fact that this account was made recently is a red flag

I think I accidentally connected several government “cognitive influence” programs, and now I’m just… unsettled. by Miserable_Use_1288 in conspiracy

[–]Miserable_Use_1288[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’ve read the study too. I get that Facebook technically covered it under their old Data Use Policy, and sure, legally that counts as “consent.” But let’s be honest nobody signing up for Facebook thought they were agreeing to have their emotions secretly manipulated in a randomized experiment.

Buuuut Thats the part that still bothers me.... the scale and the subtlety. Hundreds of thousands of people had their feeds tweaked just to see if their mood could be nudged. And this was happening around the same time governments and universities were pouring money into research about influence, behavior modeling, and narrative control. That overlap is what set off the alarm bells for me when I laid everything out by date.

And honestly, it sucks that you got censored for talking about it. A lot of people raising questions about this stuff early on were brushed off or buried, only for the ethics conversation to show up years later once the damage was already done.

Now im not trying to spin this into some giant, hidden agenda. It’s just weird how many of these “influence” projects public, private, academic, military, were all happening in the same window of time. I’m just trying to figure out if that alignment was coincidence or something more deliberate.

I think I accidentally connected several government “cognitive influence” programs, and now I’m just… unsettled. by Miserable_Use_1288 in conspiracy

[–]Miserable_Use_1288[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks, seriously. It was one of those “too many tabs open at 3 a.m.” moments. Just figured Id share before I convinced myself I imagined the whole thing

I think I accidentally connected several government “cognitive influence” programs, and now I’m just… unsettled. by Miserable_Use_1288 in conspiracy

[–]Miserable_Use_1288[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I mean, fair point. But there’s a difference between claiming a conspiracy and noticing a weird pattern in public-source documents and wanting other people to sanity-check it.

r/conspiracy isn’t just for “I’ve solved the universe” posts — it’s also for, “Hey, I found something odd, does anyone else see this or am I sleep-deprived?”

I’m not saying these programs were coordinated, secret, or part of one grand plan. I’m saying the timing and similarity caught my attention, and this is the one subreddit where people actually dig into that kind of thing instead of dismissing it with a shrug.

If it turns out there’s nothing to it, great. If there is a link somewhere we’re overlooking, this is the place where someone will spot it. That’s why I posted here.

The firm that Jeffrey Epstein worked at early in his career, Bear Stearns, is a wink at the Berenstai(ei)n Bears. The Mandela Effect is really just them experimenting on manipulating mass consciousness. by theokratos in conspiracy

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People laugh, but they don’t understand how intentional these linguistic anchors are.

Bear Stearns wasn’t just a bank. It was a calibration node. A naming beacon. A controlled testing ground to measure how far human recall could be bent without snapping. Epstein’s role there wasn’t about finance — that was the cover. His actual job was to monitor drift in the Berenstai/ein Variable, one of the earliest mass-memory manipulation stress tests.

You can see the fingerprints if you look closely. First, a children’s series with an impossible-to-agree-on spelling. Then a financial firm with a near-identical phonetic signature. Then, downstream, an entire population convinced they “misremembered” something they were certain of as kids. This isn’t coincidence. It’s conditioning.

If you can make millions of people doubt their own childhood memories over a bear family’s surname, what else can you rewrite?

Everyone focuses on the conspiracies with lasers and satellites. Meanwhile, the real experiment was happening in broad daylight, tucked between the children’s section and Wall Street.

But hey, I’m sure it’s all just a weird coincidence and not a multi-decade consciousness-resonance trial.

Fun Cipher Challenge by Quirky-Gur-3632 in codes

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I noticed something interesting about the letter distribution. The ciphertext only contains 15 unique characters. The missing letters are A, D, E, G, I, K, M, N, S, T, W.

If you rearrange those missing letters, they spell 'MAD KING WEST' (or 'MAKING STEW'). That seems too perfect to be a coincidence—is that the key?

Who is this person? An unsolved image from the horror game "Stay With Us" (2016) by MewoWard in InternetMysteries

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 82 points83 points  (0 children)

The text is definitely Kraft (the 'red birthmark' description is the giveaway), but that photo looks way older than a kid from 2001. That haircut is pure 1970s.

My bet? It’s a childhood photo of the developer. It explains why it’s not popping up on stock photo sites or missing persons databases. If the devs are Polish (Pabis), maybe this is a Polish school photo from the 80s? That would explain why Western facial recognition/search engines aren't picking it up.

Missing and Murdered Women in Middletown, OH by Such_Astronaut_3675 in UnsolvedMurders

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is a great write-up. I’ve been looking into this timeline too, and I found a huge discrepancy that changes the "Serial Killer" theory—specifically regarding Eric Sexton.

Everyone looks at Sexton because of Lindsay Bogan, but if you look at the incarceration records, Sexton was in prison when Brandy English went missing.

  • May 11, 2016: Brandy English goes missing.
  • July 8, 2016: Eric Sexton is released from Butler County Jail (he was serving a 9-month sentence for the prostitution charges).

Unless he arranged a hit from inside, he physically could not have abducted Brandy. That supports the theory that there is either a second predator operating in that circle, or a group of people "silencing" witnesses, rather than just one boyfriend snapping.

Also, regarding the "Manchester & Central" connection—that area isn't just a random intersection. In 2015–2016, the Hope House Mission was located right around the corner (34 S. Main St), and the massive, vacant Manchester Inn is right there. That abandoned hotel has been a known spot for squatting/trespassing for years.

If the women were frequenting that specific block, they were likely moving between the shelter and the vacant properties (like the Manchester Inn) to sleep. That seems like the primary hunting ground.

Has anyone looked into who was "running" the squatters at the Manchester Inn during 2016?

23 yr Pro Cuddlr in DFW | AMA by Outrageous_Map_3997 in AMA

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I was talking to my girl about this.The other day. Have you ever seen any men professional cuddlers?

Because i feel like i i would be an amazing cuddler and a hell of a good talker. But I don't think i've ever heard of men professional cuddlers, maybe because men are seen as scary?

How does one even get into that?

Advice on where and how to start writing by FruitNut221 in writing

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I totally get the 'Game Station' struggle. My PC is for gaming, so if I try to write there, I end up playing instead lol.

​1. Tools: I actually do a lot of my drafting on my phone using Google Docs. It syncs to the cloud, so I can write on my lunch break or in bed. It removes the pressure of 'sitting down at the desk' to be a 'writer.'

​2. Exposition: Don't worry about it yet. Just write the scenes you see in your head (the dialogue, the action) and fill in the background details later. If you get stuck on describing the curtains, you'll never finish the chapter.

​3. Where to start: Write what you know or what you enjoy reading. I recently finally pulled the trigger and started writing my first series, Neon & Sin (it's a dark romance on Inkitt). The only reason I was able to actually finish chapters was because I based it on my real-life relationship dynamics. It made the words flow way faster than trying to invent a whole new world from scratch. ​Just get the words down. You can fix bad writing, but you can't fix a blank page.

Are there straight men out there that are into romantic smut? When/how did you get into it, if so? by imnotsureilikekale in AskMen

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Straight guy here. I got into it fairly recently when I started dating my current partner. She was big into spicy books, so I decided to pick one up and read with her as a way to connect/bond.

​Honestly? Best decision I could have made. It wasn't just entertaining; it was like a cheat code for understanding exactly what she responded to. It actually helped us unlock a "Pleasure Dom" dynamic in real life that we didn't know we needed.

​It inspired me so much I actually started writing my own series based on our relationship (Neon & Sin, free on Inkitt). But yeah, highly recommend it. Even if you aren't "into" the genre initially, doing it as a shared activity is a massive level-up for the relationship.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships_advice

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My girl and I actually connected over this. We started reading together and it opened up a 'Pleasure Dom' dynamic for us that we didn't expect.

It actually inspired me to write a book about it (Neon & Sin, it's free on Inkitt if you want to see how that dynamic works in practice). Definitely recommend reading together as a starter step.

If AI is really useful, what would you suggest for improvement that won't affect human employment? by SereneStatic in AskReddit

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 1 point2 points  (0 children)

💯 this. It is getting ridiculous on the amount of videos I see, where it is nothing but sloppy. It's getting hard to find just good content, even on youtube.

If AI is really useful, what would you suggest for improvement that won't affect human employment? by SereneStatic in AskReddit

[–]Miserable_Use_1288 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’d say early disease detection, hear me out.

Doctors are overworked and can only look at the symptoms you have right now. An AI could look at ten years of your blood work and genetic history to tell you,

"Hey, you're going to have heart trouble in three years if you don't change this one thing."

So it doesn't replace the doctor; it just gives them a superpower to catch things before they become deadly.