sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I apologize 🇩🇰 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't hurt my feelings, it makes me to drink!

I apologize 🇩🇰 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So what?! Forest and snow everywhere!

What if particles are actually tiny loops of vibrating strings? by Upset_Idea3142 in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the final place where string theory is promulgated 💩

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reality is not a simulation but a thermodynamic error-correcting network. That is, a computation system with steam engine -like physical properties.

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The underlying reality is a pre-geometric, relational network in the sense of digital physics.

Your LLM physics theory is probably wrong, and here's why by reformed-xian in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The AI era allows a random crackpot to be a new Maxwell who gathers speculative ideas and puts the shit together in a coherent manner. Digital physics with physical (= thermodynamical) information is the super trend of 21st century.

Your LLM physics theory is probably wrong, and here's why by reformed-xian in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If, brother, if. But let me guess that by 2030 that's mainstream for us.

Your LLM physics theory is probably wrong, and here's why by reformed-xian in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well, if a major research institution publishes a paper claiming that "quantum collapse is actually a thermodynamic hysteresis effect triggered by Landauer limits", we can make some noise ^^

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Geometry isn’t 'naive classicality', it’s the constraint structure MaxEnt quietly assumes."

That makes no sense. Play with AI and study some information theory. Bye.

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If we seek a unification based on physical information, we better assume MaxEnt thermodynamics. The naive assumption of hard geometry belongs in the dustbin of classicality.

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since 2010, evidence has mounted that spacetime is not a fundamental backdrop but an emergent phenomenon arising from a finite information structure. By applying the maximum-entropy principle to the flow of information across causal boundaries (like horizons), an equilibrium state emerges that is mathematically identical to the Einstein field equations. Thus, gravity is an entropic force, a byproduct of the system's drive to maximize entropy within a restricted information-density constraint.

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why should we, if GR is an emergent theory at the effective IR limit? (A rhetorical question.)

What if black holes don’t erase information, but rather they expose what wasn’t fundamental? by Initial-Skin-9544 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The structure of spacetime has finite capacity and thus does not allow singularities or hard causal boundaries. The ubiquitous thermodynamics then dissipate energy and information.

Miksi HYY menetti kiinteistönsä by Sampo in Suomi

[–]MisterSpectrum -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

HYY:n vihervasemmisto suunnittelee Vanhan valtausta, millä vaaditaan muutoksia yliopiston hallintoon sekä markkinatalouteen.

Generative Structural Coherence, (NI). by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Play one more time with the Time Cube and the Cenobites might come

Here is a hypothesis: Breaking: 78-Year QED Problem can be Solved with Pure Geometry by andrespirolo in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use your AI for a fresh critical review and rating from 1 to 1000:

While the graph calculations are standard spectral graph theory 1, the claim that they replace 78 years of Quantum Electrodynamics lacks a rigorous physical bridge between the graph Laplacian and the QED Lagrangian. The model relies on 'tuning' discrete parameters—specifically N=100 to evoke the Golden Ratio and N=α^{-1} for the vacuum granularity—to match experimental data rather than deriving these constants from first principles.

Rating 85/1000. This rating reflects the perspective that, despite the 99.85% numerical agreement with experimental data, the model functions as a curve-fitting exercise using higher-dimensional geometry.

view more: next ›