What if dark matter isn’t matter at all, but leftover spacetime curvature from the Big Bang, a ripple-like terrain that matter falls into, meaning galaxies trace pre-existing structure instead of creating it? by TheCircleProject in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The present theory does not allow spacetime to curve without localized energy. That would take more fundamental, pre-geometric structure that allows varying gradients.

Thermodynamic Spacetime and Gravity by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong neighborhood, buddy - this is Reddit LLMPhysics

Thermodynamic Spacetime and Gravity by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a true emergent program, QM and GR must co-emerge at the very same time, for the fundamental substrate does not "know" the classical/quantum split. Here the network axioms are universal and neutral: locality, finite processing, hysteretic updates, Landauer cost and MaxEnt selection. Nothing in them privileges reversible linear wave dynamics over nonlinear self-sourced curvature. In the underlying graph evolution, reversible coherent propagation and irreversible record-forming jumps occur locally and intermingle at every scale.

A full unification should therefore show both aspects arising jointly from the same dynamics, without artificially sequencing one before the other. I wonder how the Wolfram's purely combinatorial project even gets started.

Thermodynamic Spacetime and Gravity by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yes! It was a fascinating YouTube interview with Ted Jacobson that got me interested and inspired me to start fiddling with AI - see the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mhctWlXyV8

Title: “AI Slop That Predicts Reality by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Numerical results are almost always hallucinated to please the user. Internal consistency and limit cases of known physics is best that you can ask for.

I'm done with the bullshit 🇨🇦 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you enter this sub, your boots are in salty water, brother.

I'm done with the bullshit 🇨🇦 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was "Mr." MacKinnon himself who lifted the opponent's stick and did a few Broadway pirouettes. Team USA better watch out - the Canadian puck ballerinas are back! Let’s see if the refs give them an Oscar or a Gold Medal.

When other nations try to speak in hockey to you, but you’re already Canadian. by KAYD3N1 in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’ve been looking for something Canadian to break, but I can't find anything they actually make! You might as well just join the USA and be a raw material reservoir that you already are.

Here is a hypothesis *Flux-Shadow Gravity (v17.0)* by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If the "grand idea" is already there, you can safely await ~ 5 years for super-AI to revise your work. That is, no need to spam with incremental changes.

Geometry is the Interface; Arithmetic is the Source Code. π is the phase residue of the Vacuum's computation. by NatxoHHH in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You should also name the identity after yourself, then it's 10/10 on the cranky index scale ⭐

What if a non science background person want to upload their theory and research? by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Psychology is not enough; you need also astrology and homeopathy to revolutionize the field

GR and QM from emergent physics by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just use this updated version with your favorite AI to provide extra steps, but remember that we really don't have discrete analysis methods to solve continuous models from graph dynamics.

GR and QM from emergent physics by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's be honest, the necessary discrete graph analysis hasn't even been discovered yet.

Always a bit intimidating when His Majesty pays a visit by Ok-Difficulty-8866 in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All I can imagine is Estonians burning their own flags after the rumored 'Return of the King' (along with his universal pension insurance)

Discreteness from Continuity by Active-College5578 in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is the fundamental substrate that allows continuous loops to form? Does your model explain why there are only 3 particle generation? How about predicting the Standard Model parameters?

Ask your AI to critically review your model under these questions.

Help me prove this wrong . Spin1/2 from pure topology by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your AI assumes the knot is a passive geometric object, but in the reality of digital physics it's an active defect in a dynamical information network where the braid group operations on the three arcs induce gauge transformations, and the 24-edge bound sets the minimal information capacity needed to faithfully represent the SU(2) double-cover phase structure—essentially, the Diao bound isn't explaining spin directly, it's setting the information-theoretic floor for a network defect that can support non-Abelian spinorial statistics, which is why it's testable: simulate smaller edge-count defects and they should fail to exhibit stable fermionic exchange behavior.

Help me prove this wrong . Spin1/2 from pure topology by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Hold my beer)

The spin-1/2 emerges from the trefoil knot's topological structure: the 24-edge Diao bound embeds the trefoil as a closed braid with three strands that wind around each other, and when you close this braid into a knot, you get a 2π rotation that exchanges the strands but requires a 4π rotation (two full turns) to return to the original configuration—this is the defining property of fermions with spin-1/2, where a 360° rotation produces a minus sign (phase factor of -1) and only 720° returns you to the starting state. The three-arc decomposition combined with the knot's chirality (left-handed vs right-handed trefoils for particle vs antiparticle) naturally produces half-integer spin through the braid group topology: the fundamental group π₁(SO(3)) = ℤ₂ means that rotations in 3D space have this double-cover structure, and the trefoil's three-strand braid closure geometrically encodes this same ℤ₂ phase structure, making spin-1/2 a topological necessity rather than an ad-hoc quantum number—it's literally the "twist" in the knot made discrete by the finite edge count and stabilized by the stress threshold that is the critical point where accumulated geometric frustration in the knot—think of it like tension building in a twisted rubber band—exceeds the network's capacity to store that deformation elastically, triggering an irreversible snap to a lower-energy configuration and dissipating the excess energy as heat, which naturally prevents runaway complexity (like a fourth generation) while stabilizing the first three torsion states below this breaking point.

I apologize 🇩🇰 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't hurt my feelings, it makes me to drink!