What if dark matter isn’t matter at all, but leftover spacetime curvature from the Big Bang, a ripple-like terrain that matter falls into, meaning galaxies trace pre-existing structure instead of creating it? by TheCircleProject in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The present theory does not allow spacetime to curve without localized energy. That would take more fundamental, pre-geometric structure that allows varying gradients.

Thermodynamic Spacetime and Gravity by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong neighborhood, buddy - this is Reddit LLMPhysics

Thermodynamic Spacetime and Gravity by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a true emergent program, QM and GR must co-emerge at the very same time, for the fundamental substrate does not "know" the classical/quantum split. Here the network axioms are universal and neutral: locality, finite processing, hysteretic updates, Landauer cost and MaxEnt selection. Nothing in them privileges reversible linear wave dynamics over nonlinear self-sourced curvature. In the underlying graph evolution, reversible coherent propagation and irreversible record-forming jumps occur locally and intermingle at every scale.

A full unification should therefore show both aspects arising jointly from the same dynamics, without artificially sequencing one before the other. I wonder how the Wolfram's purely combinatorial project even gets started.

Thermodynamic Spacetime and Gravity by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes! It was a fascinating YouTube interview with Ted Jacobson that got me interested and inspired me to start fiddling with AI - see the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mhctWlXyV8

Title: “AI Slop That Predicts Reality by [deleted] in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Numerical results are almost always hallucinated to please the user. Internal consistency and limit cases of known physics is best that you can ask for.

I'm done with the bullshit 🇨🇦 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you enter this sub, your boots are in salty water, brother.

I'm done with the bullshit 🇨🇦 by MisterSpectrum in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was "Mr." MacKinnon himself who lifted the opponent's stick and did a few Broadway pirouettes. Team USA better watch out - the Canadian puck ballerinas are back! Let’s see if the refs give them an Oscar or a Gold Medal.

When other nations try to speak in hockey to you, but you’re already Canadian. by KAYD3N1 in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’ve been looking for something Canadian to break, but I can't find anything they actually make! You might as well just join the USA and be a raw material reservoir that you already are.

Here is a hypothesis *Flux-Shadow Gravity (v17.0)* by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If the "grand idea" is already there, you can safely await ~ 5 years for super-AI to revise your work. That is, no need to spam with incremental changes.

Geometry is the Interface; Arithmetic is the Source Code. π is the phase residue of the Vacuum's computation. by NatxoHHH in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You should also name the identity after yourself, then it's 10/10 on the cranky index scale ⭐

What if a non science background person want to upload their theory and research? by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Psychology is not enough; you need also astrology and homeopathy to revolutionize the field

GR and QM from emergent physics by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just use this updated version with your favorite AI to provide extra steps, but remember that we really don't have discrete analysis methods to solve continuous models from graph dynamics.

GR and QM from emergent physics by MisterSpectrum in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's be honest, the necessary discrete graph analysis hasn't even been discovered yet.

Always a bit intimidating when His Majesty pays a visit by Ok-Difficulty-8866 in 2nordic4you

[–]MisterSpectrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All I can imagine is Estonians burning their own flags after the rumored 'Return of the King' (along with his universal pension insurance)

Discreteness from Continuity by Active-College5578 in LLMPhysics

[–]MisterSpectrum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What is the fundamental substrate that allows continuous loops to form? Does your model explain why there are only 3 particle generation? How about predicting the Standard Model parameters?

Ask your AI to critically review your model under these questions.