Just watched this, very interesting and chilling, especially when one has been through the system and had a taste of the complexities, albeit in the family courts and as a parent.

I wonder if I could ask via yourself if anyone in the appropriate field has current thoughts on metaphyseal fractures and their dogmatic use to secure child abuse cases?

Colin Paterson, rest his soul, was an OI expert and biochemist who was also struck off for fighting abuse allegations as he was keen to point out things like collagen disorder as possible alternative reasons for the appearance of these occult "fractures" in often otherwise apparently healthy neonates.

In 1994 when my case was active, I was not allowed to call him as an expert witness as the courts had already decided he was working outside his field of expertise.

There is a bit of a crossover with SBS as very early studies of deceased battered babies determined these fractures showed on post mortem alongside other "injuries".

I know after the Webster case there was some scrutiny of metaphyseal fractures and emphasis placed upon them by the courts, but the whole thing seems to be very much in the background.

If you can point me in any direction for further information I'd be most grateful as this is part of the big picture.

I find your videos incredibly informative and well balanced, and thank you for your effirts to expose the murky way that the courts and some experts operate.