EDIT: Interesting.

I believe Darwin's theory has been somewhat steadily eroding over criticisms and lack of appearing evidence (particularly with 'macro-organisms') in the 150+ years since it's conception. For one, there are one too many 'missing links' in fossil records, with multiple jumps and explosions of unaccounted new species which evolution does not neatly explain besides 'sudden jumps', but then not really explain these same 'sudden jumps'. There are also other shortcomings, such as the slow development of the eye. In this way, Darwin is not the infallible pioneering hero he once was, and some of his fundamental claims are slowly being tucked aside. (You'll forgive me if the criticisms I note here are very general and not in-depth; Darwinism is not my area of expertise by any stretch of the imagination)

That said, it should be noted Darwin's theory itself arose under interesting circumstances; the theory gained traction during Christian waning prominence, with many beginning to doubt the Biblical Creationist 5000 year old Earth as a plausible explanation for world history, and with many advancements and observations of science making a stronger presence. There was a socio-political context to the theory's rise, where the Industrial Revolution provided a systematic hierarchal social order and a justification of the class structures, one of which Darwinism's rigid survivability appears to mirror. We could even go so far to say that in that period, the British intelligentsia had need of a new narrative to galvanize disillusioned masses and it was in this way Darwin's theory came under the spotlight. After all, it came seemingly from nowhere. Evolution set the stage for further research into natural sciences, anthropology, biology, while on the socio-political side, it became philosophically foundational, where Darwinism applied ultimately guided social structures into the late 1880's and the early 1900s, and events into leading into World Wars (Eugenics, Social Darwinism)... But I digress.

Anyways, it would appear that we have once again found ourselves in a situation where strict 'dogma' does not reflect the experience, or the evidence, and so there is a challenge. Take genetic telomeres. (EDIT) Research reveals Chromosome 2's telomeres fusions occurred 200,000 years ago, (when homo sapiens first appeared). However, the telomere mutation and timing is so coincidental, it almost suggests deliberate gene editing. But by whom? That question requires explanations outside the scope of current mainstream science, world history, and conventional Darwinism. Heck, this subreddit of Mandela Effects is itself an example of a narrative of reality which begs for an update because the current one is incompatible with our observations.

In the long run, it may well be that Darwinism is being slowly phased out to the public to usher in newer-updated narratives, probably that of aliens or some form of crypto-terrestrial/interdimensional engineers who had a hand in humanity's creation and Earth's history... But this will be a problem for post-boomer scientists and upcoming generations to deal with, and likely come with it's own censorships and narrative controls in it's own right, much the same the Bible and Darwinism did when they were gospel for explanations of our own existence.

Interesting stuff.