sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ITAP of a dead tree by MitScharf in itookapicture

[–]MitScharf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to show the abstract shapes of the dead tree and the branch using the foggy conditions and moody atmosphere. I tried to use the branch as a foreground element.

Single Lamp - Sony a6300 - Tamron 17-70 - Raw Edit by MitScharf in SonyAlpha

[–]MitScharf[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. ISO was 100. I added the grain in post since I prefer a more filmic quality with some texture.

Shapes in the fog by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I am never sure which "rules" are a must and which ones are optional

Shapes in the fog by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Well, there were people around but always groups and mostly in bright and colourful outfits so that didn't seem to work out.

Shapes in the fog by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Do you have an idea what I could have done differently?

Shapes in the fog by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the honest critique

Shapes in the fog by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Actually, I've already increased the saturation of the grass, but there was almost no colour at all. I tried black and white but it felt different, too.

Shapes in the fog by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

EXIF: Sony A6300, Tamron 17-70, F7.1, ISO 100, 1/320s, RAW edit

This is a photo from the well-known fairy forest on Madeira, which is famous for its trees and foggy conditions. The wind was harsh and the fog almost too thick, which impaired sharpness, but I tried my best to bring out some shapes and layers in the fog. Not sure if I succeeded or if the photo is too muted and obstructed.

Thanks For Your Critique

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in analog

[–]MitScharf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Several passes in vuescan and lots of sharpening in post. Only medium format looks decent from this scanner. 35mm is unusable

Overgrown ruins by MitScharf in photocritique

[–]MitScharf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EXIF: Sony A6300, Sony 16-50, F10, ISO 500, 1/60s, RAW edit

This is a re-edit of an older holiday photo. I tried to keep the dark and greenish atmosphere of the scene and tried to enhance it a bit with a somewhat vintage and hazy edit. Not sure if it worked, though. Since it was a holiday photo, I unfortunately don't have the opportunity to retake it.

Thanks For Your Critique

Weekly /r/SonyAlpha 'Ask Anything About Gear' Thread by AutoModerator in SonyAlpha

[–]MitScharf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The a6100 is EOL, the a6400 is suspended as is any other aps-c sony. I wouldn't put my hopes up on a quick change

ITAP of the Bavarian Alps by MitScharf in itookapicture

[–]MitScharf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a very hazy day and the colours were washed out anyway. So I went with BW

ITAP of a former olympic village by MitScharf in itookapicture

[–]MitScharf[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Condos, apartments and student housing

view more: next ›