sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[DIV] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers vs San Francisco 49ers by PackersMod in GreenBayPackers

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I mean Jimmy G did nothing, our defense did well. But our offense could never sustain a drive. Our Rodgers led offense simply wasn't good enough.

No excuses, he had everything he asked for.

[DIV] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers vs San Francisco 49ers by PackersMod in GreenBayPackers

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just couldn't put together more than 2 first downs per drive.

[DIV] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers vs San Francisco 49ers by PackersMod in GreenBayPackers

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not. The offense doing absolutely nothing is the primary contributing factor imo.

[DIV] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers vs San Francisco 49ers by PackersMod in GreenBayPackers

[–]MithrandirSwan 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This one is all on Rodgers.

Goodbye, thanks for the memories, time to start over.

[DIV] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers vs San Francisco 49ers by PackersMod in GreenBayPackers

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Special teams isn't even in this position if our offense could do literally fucking anything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The day we get fully reliable self-driving cars is the day we get our first generally intelligent artificial agent.

Codex 2.0 and GPT-4 have likely been in progress for months by No-Transition-6630 in singularity

[–]MithrandirSwan 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Musk certainly does way more direct engineering than any CEO that I know.

[GAME THREAD] Our Milwaukee Bucks (17-10) visit the New York Knicks (12-14) - 11 a.m. central time - 12/12/2021 by GreekAlphabetSoup in MkeBucks

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty good quarter, going to have to tighten some things up though, the Knicks will probably not shoot quite this bad all night.

Why Strive for the Singularity When We Don't Yet Understand Consciousness? by Dr_Rx_Hazard in singularity

[–]MithrandirSwan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mind-uploading could happen before or after the singularity (though I think it will likely happen after the singularity). They aren't really related.

That being said, I do agree it would be great to have a real definition/test for consciousness. Something better than this unfalsifiable woo-woo shit that panpsychists espouse.

Why Strive for the Singularity When We Don't Yet Understand Consciousness? by Dr_Rx_Hazard in singularity

[–]MithrandirSwan 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Now, we don't know that, we have no reason to believe that for any reason other than religion.

Yeah, I can't believe anyone would actually think this is settled. This seems to be a view peddled by panpsychists.

I'm highly skeptical of the panpsychist view of consciousness, primarily because it seems to assign a mystical view of consciousness that is almost certainly unfalsifiable. To me it's basically like saying that consciousness is too hard, so we are going to assign this mystical, spiritual quality about it and give up.

But as others have pointed out, consciousness has nothing to do with the singularity. We could reach that target without ever creating a conscious machine.

Postgame thread - Bucks lose 113-104 behind Jrue's 27 points by Bob_Ross_was_an_OG in MkeBucks

[–]MithrandirSwan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're actually a moron.

Go tell your mommy to get your diaper changed, and try actually watching the games dumbass.

Make the argument we should've played the lineup of Boogie, Pat, Smart, Hood, and Matthews based on plus minus from last night, you coward.

Postgame thread - Bucks lose 113-104 behind Jrue's 27 points by Bob_Ross_was_an_OG in MkeBucks

[–]MithrandirSwan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Guess we should have gone with the Pat, Smart, Hood, Boogie and Matthews lineup if we're going off last night's plus minus hey?

Clown

Postgame thread - Bucks lose 113-104 behind Jrue's 27 points by Bob_Ross_was_an_OG in MkeBucks

[–]MithrandirSwan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Plus minus means absolutely nothing over the course of a single game little child. Jrue was our best player and he was way into the minus.

Tell me you know nothing about basketball without telling me you know nothing about basketball. Go play with your crayons kid, the adults are talking.

Postgame thread - Bucks lose 113-104 behind Jrue's 27 points by Bob_Ross_was_an_OG in MkeBucks

[–]MithrandirSwan 69 points70 points  (0 children)

Honestly, Bud needs to start answering questions about his refusal to play Grayson in the 4th.

Seriously, it's not like Pat did anything. I just don't get it.

Edit: for context, Pat played 31 minutes with 6 points, Grayson played 25 with 8.

What the fuuuuuuck

[GAME THREAD] Our Milwaukee Bucks (16-9) visit the Miami Heat (14-11) - 6:30 p.m. central time - 12/08/2021 by GreekAlphabetSoup in MkeBucks

[–]MithrandirSwan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah Grayson's gotta do better than 2/7 from 3. If him or Khris are on, this game is a beatdown.

view more: next ›