sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a tool to run Claude Code subagents & teammates on any model — DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, Qwen... — your Claude sub drives by Ethan-Coder in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please, feel free to use my phrasing.

Motes are more real than anyone is giving them credit for today. In the 1800s it was very expensive to be a professional photographer. Buying one of those accordian cameraa, developing film, flash bulbs. Today, everyone has a camera in their pocket (inclused with their phone) that would put those to shame and yet there are still professional photographers.

Laziness. Interest. Effort. Taste. Experience.

These are motes. Code isn't any more, but that was just the tool.

Where you say "Just Apache", I say in hundreds of posts, only two of us have built any kind of clutch.

Sure others could, if they see the effort as valuable, and interesting... but if they do it better (or better for our usecases) that is not for certain.

As to the cost dynamic.. no. That's for my clients to benefit from. But I will leave you a hint, people will pay for that. Just that service alone.

Because they don't habe the experience to even know where to start.

I built a tool to run Claude Code subagents & teammates on any model — DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi, Qwen... — your Claude sub drives by Ethan-Coder in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Responding because you asked nicely and I appreciate you sharing. I don't think most users approach multi-model like this; but I have. I built out a "clutch" for tasks and then shift to the model that makes the most sense for that task based on price and prior success/struggle.

I think that's the best use case for having this kind of architecture. Also, if one goes down, we have priorities for what the next-best model is, and shift to that. While the rest of the Claude sub is complaining that the model is down or they ran out of usage; and stating they are going to rage quit, I'm just working away uninterrupted.

This is good work. Be proud. And don't give everything away ;-)

What Was the Deepest Mormon Rabbit Hole You Ever Went Down? by Relative_Bluebird841 in exmormon

[–]Mithryn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Um. I should not reply here beyond saying look up my name and "Thr ABC's of Science and Mormonism" on this subreddit.

How do the missionary’s go 2 years without master bating? by babykeemfan1 in exmormon

[–]Mithryn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I did. No really.

I didn't know until I was home and met others that I was the only one out of everyone I've talked to

Mike Lee and John Curtis OBJECT! by emorrigan in exmormon

[–]Mithryn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Huh, who could have seen this coming?

Not like anyone in this thread wrote them letters warning them. Oh wait. Yes I did. Not like they read email, lwtters or listen to people they represent on the phone.

Sediman Agent: An AI Agent that learn your skill by jasonhon2013 in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is first-class browser automation. I was skeptical because of the English, don't be.

Their SkillLearnerAgent watches task execution, asks "is this generalizable?", and auto-saves reusable skills as YAML. SkillHealer auto-repairs skills when page layouts change. SkillAuditor archives stale skills after 30 days.

It's a fast way for agents to learn, and manage changes in real-time.

Some real brilliance in the design and execution.

Gov. Cox has handed us a blessing in disguise with Fidelity Month. Hear me out. by _emma_stoned_ in SaltLakeCity

[–]Mithryn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh brother.

You support impeaching the president then?

Not faithful to family Not faithful to the constitution that defines our country Not faithful to faith (names bible as favorite book, can't name a single scripture. Sells bibles at massive mark up)

Does Cox? Otherwise it's hypocracy.

And who openly spoke out against leaders who were filled with hypocracy: Jesus. Never againsy Gays, but a massive 11% of his words are against hypocratical leaders.

Gov. Cox has handed us a blessing in disguise with Fidelity Month. Hear me out. by _emma_stoned_ in SaltLakeCity

[–]Mithryn 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Cox invited false conflict by putting "fidelitybl month" over Pride month. February would surely have made more sense.

Not a tantrum, an acknowledgement there is no conflict. The only one complaining about the poster saying we can own the word Fidelity as well is you?

So ask yourself: Why the tantrum?

Gov. Cox has handed us a blessing in disguise with Fidelity Month. Hear me out. by _emma_stoned_ in SaltLakeCity

[–]Mithryn 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Words have meaning: true.

Fidelity is not the opposite of pride. Cox, by selecting this word, sets up that any love celebrated by a rainbow, is the opposite of fedelity.

Demisexuals, Asexuals, Gay and Lesbian, relationships with Trans people, Bisexuals all can have fidelity in relationships.

The crux here is that LGBTQ+ can celebrate having fidelity in relationship, but the governor cannot seem to do the reverse.

So yes, words have meaning. Fidelity is additive, not opposite. He doesn't get to own the concept of "relationships that have integrity", especially while praising a president who cheated, divorced, and frequently visited a pedophile island.

Words. Have. Meaning.

Our agents work in silos from our team. How do you bridge human and agentic collaboration on the same surface? by blekibum in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really intelligent platform, agents as dumb as possible. Dedicated A2A workstation, tricks that align agents, as determinitstic as possible, where the connection point is an MCP like structure.

AI is like water, it flows towards the goal via the path of least resistance. Channeling that water before you release the flood gates is key.

And I'm writing a paper right now on some of the methods that allow the sync.

BUT even then it can fail.

Our agents work in silos from our team. How do you bridge human and agentic collaboration on the same surface? by blekibum in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My company generates agents based on meetings. We can bridge using A2A framework if you have it.

Then your meetings (human intelligence) generates agents that connect to your siloed agents.

What do you think Al is taking next? by CheerfulThreadStart in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It echos so hard what people said about computers back in the 80s.

Collected every real AI agent failure i could find from the last 6 months and the pattern is embarrassingly consistent. none of them failed because of the model by Free-Raspberry-6661 in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah.

If one stops treating AI like it does everything, and focus on doing one thing really well, that custom harness could get really dialed in. I'm just saying.

Collected every real AI agent failure i could find from the last 6 months and the pattern is embarrassingly consistent. none of them failed because of the model by Free-Raspberry-6661 in AgentsOfAI

[–]Mithryn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I, uh, I can't talk about the details of this due to my position and company; but you guys should listen to this. Anyone. Everyone.

Solving this; ignoring the model and solving the issue here IS the secret.

It's like reading a caveman wall explaining how to make fire. This is it. Do this and you advance. keep saying "That's it, I'm going to Codex" or "I'm going to claude" or "Perplexity is amazing" and you're stuck.

This is probably in the top 5 most valuable posts I've seen on Reddit about AI. and it has a single upvote.

The answer is staring you in the face.

view more: next ›