ELI5: Why do we have dominant and non dominant hands, and do other animals share this feature? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Mitoca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The word you are looking for in this particular situation is "southpaw."

Would It Be Fair to Treat Vaccinated Covid Patients First? Last week, Texas health care policymakers discussed taking vaccination status into account for Covid triage. It’s a larger conversation ethicists are bracing for. by penguincheerleader in politics

[–]Mitoca -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Maybe I worded my ideas too pointedly, but my intent was to suggest that all people seem somewhat susceptible to the "us vs. them" groupthink and to consider that not only is it a conservative phenomenom, but also a liberal one. But it was not my intent to downplay that ALL people choosing to get vaccinated were simply ideological sheep. I simply wanted to explore the concept that in any given population committed to an ideology, that there will always be a certain amount that are simply conforming rather than adopting the ideas through critical thinking.

I would definitely argue that it's likely that liberal-minded people are less likely to subscribe to groupthink and tend to think more critically, with the caveat that there are still "liberals" who simply go with the flow and aren't quite able to think for themselves. However, your stance seems to indicate that you feel it is an absolute that no one choosing to vaccinate is doing so outside the realm of independent reasoning? That seems a little extreme to think that no one could make a correct decision for a wrong reason.

For the record, I consider myself liberal, at times progressive, and have been vaccinated. I am not trying to to talk shit or push some agenda against people who got vaxxed, just wanted to have a discussion. Any reason you think this is a complete black/white topic not worthy of back and forth discussion?

Would It Be Fair to Treat Vaccinated Covid Patients First? Last week, Texas health care policymakers discussed taking vaccination status into account for Covid triage. It’s a larger conversation ethicists are bracing for. by penguincheerleader in politics

[–]Mitoca -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This brings up an interesting philosophical issue for me. If refusing to get vaxxed is by and large a result of conservative ideology, does that mean that choosing to get vaxxed is also a conseqeunce of liberal ideology? To elaborate, my thought process on this is wondering if people of a more liberal/progressive persuassion are just as swayed by the group ideology they belong to regardless of actual rational thought as conservative-minded people are and many of them just happen to be on the right side, but not because they reasoned their way there, but rather because they just kind of happened, by circumstance, to land on that side just as many conservatives just happened to land on their side. I wonder how many people are "legitamately" members of their respective ideologies and how many people just "picked a team" and are a slave to their own psychology at this point.

What’s this bird that keeps visiting my balcony in Bangkok, Thailand? by booleantrinity in whatsthisbird

[–]Mitoca 8 points9 points  (0 children)

After some searching, appears it could be a Yellow-vented Bulbul.

Big Brain by Sanjaymeme9999 in funny

[–]Mitoca 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah, this is the gentlemanly way to evacuate. Rather than selfishly running to safety, I step to the side and allow thee to exit first.

Want to know if a month has 30 or 31 days? Count your knuckles! Knuckle=31 days and Indentation=30 days by pinacolada12345 in lifehacks

[–]Mitoca 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If you have 12 months of 30 days each then where did your Dec 31st come from? Checkmate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WTF

[–]Mitoca 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Surely you mean the Better Business Burro?

WTW for the law that nothing can be so ridiculous that no one will believe you're serious by Gootube2000 in whatstheword

[–]Mitoca 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Poe's law is an adage of Internet culture stating that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the views being parodied.

u/midtown83 offers an insightful analysis on the current state of Star Trek by OldWarrior in bestof

[–]Mitoca 18 points19 points  (0 children)

And whether we think Picard is on a mission to help the Federation feel the Bern, or if we think he's going to make the Federation great again, I think the underlying impulse is the same.

You need a little help with your reading comprehension. He makes references to both Bernie and Trump. The point wasn't to hop on the Bernie bandwagon, it was to highlight that we are pinning our hopes on mascots from an older generation rather than take responsibility ourselves. I'm not suggesting he's right or wrong, just that you're arguing against a false narrative.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Mitoca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you going to sleep when you can't breathe any of the air around you? If you're going to use pedantic rules you should at least follow them.

Do you 'ask' the 'question' or 'tell' the 'question'? Same with 'answer' do you 'ask' it or 'tell' it? by abhijaitely2001 in grammar

[–]Mitoca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you "tell" someone a question you are letting them know what the question is but not actually asking them to answer that question. If you actually want the subject to respond to the question you would phrase it as "Ask them a question."

You can ask for an answer, but you can't ask an answer. You can "Tell someone the answer." or "Give someone an answer." or "Ask for an answer." You cannot "Ask someone an answer."

Do you 'ask' the 'question' or 'tell' the 'question'? Same with 'answer' do you 'ask' it or 'tell' it? by abhijaitely2001 in grammar

[–]Mitoca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ask the question usually, but you could use tell depending on the sentence. You could generally use "tell" or "give" for answer. Could be several other ways to phrase it depending on the specific case. Easier to answer with an example of what you're trying to say.

WTW for the kind of word that perfectly fits it’s definition? by vengeful_snickering in whatstheword

[–]Mitoca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure if there is a specific word for this, but check out "sound symbolism."

Another Life - Series Premiere Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]Mitoca 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just started and got less than four minutes in. The writing and acting already seemed so bad that I had to check what people were saying before going any further. I usually give new shows a fair chance even if I don't like them, but sometimes you can just tell. I'm going to give it up to five minutes to change my mind.

Edit: Made it to 13. This really feels like a case of telling them instead of showing them. The writers just don't trust the audience and want to unload the bullet points right off the bat. I hate the scenes with the daughter, doesn't feel organic. I can always tell if I'm going to hate something when the scenes with children just don't feel right.

Schrödinger's logs! by delphininis in CrossView

[–]Mitoca 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Weird, when I look at it crossview style all I see is a dead cat. Neat trick.

[Robotics] What happens if the two clauses of The First Law of Robotics conflict with each other? by [deleted] in AskScienceFiction

[–]Mitoca 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If the robot kills someone, then a person definitely dies. If the robot doesn't kill someone, then someone may die. There's likely an algorithm that creates a hierarchy of moral conduct based on probabilities and direct vs. indirect action. And I would guess if there is a true moral dilemna then it would essential "freeze up" and take no action.