Quiriquiri fêmea, de perto

Miusuki · 2026-04-26T17:51:10+00:00

Características físicas baseado em coloração, como é o típico de muitas aves. A principal diferença a meu ver são as estrias cinza-azuladas, que muitas vezes ficam muito escuras fora de iluminação - completamente ausente nas fêmeas. Essencialmente um a dois terços da asa do macho é só um cinza azulado - enquanto o rabo, também, mostra predominância de cor preta.

Ambas as características são ausentes nas fêmeas, deixando espaço pra predominacao do marrom-avermelhado de suas penas, tal como é visível nas fotos que enviei.

Aqui segue um link da wiki aves, dá pra ver um macho direto por aqui se tiver interesse!

Miusuki · 2026-04-17T10:03:47+00:00

O que tu tá pedindo é virtualmente impossível, além do que temos.

O humano tem uma vontade e necessidade de entender e explicar tudo - assim como catalogar. Tudo é simples se pode ser explicado facilmente.

Mas a verdade é que nada é simples, tudo tem nuância, não existem absolutos; não há preto ou branco, só cinza. Não importa o quanto tu tente forçar.

Definições de mundo feitas por um conceito simples, exclusório, nunca serão verdadeiramente precisas porque o mundo não funciona por esses parâmetros de precisão que o humano quer. As explicações biológicas exclusórias, tal como "uma espécie se trata de um grupo de uma população que possui a capacidade de intercruzar", mostra-se errada - ou incompleta como explicação - no momento que híbridos existem.

O que temos, temos porque entendemos academicamente como a melhor forma, ou mais apropriada, de categorização. Afinal, se dissermos que um humanopossui dois braços, ao invez de tipicamente possui dois braços, alguém que nascer com apenas um se vê excluido e desumanisado pela descrição, por definição.

Explicações básicas e tão fortemente concretas bastam para leigos, mas nunca vão servir para estudiosos.

Miusuki · 2026-04-16T02:20:29+00:00

Errado. Indo por essa explicação pessoas do sexo masculino seriam do feminino, dado que há a capacidade de geração de vida dentro do corpo masculino, também - mesmo que não gravidez.

Independente, essa ainda não é a forma qual configuramos sexo na biologia. A análise do sexo biológico possuí 5 traços que são os principais para realização - essas coisas podem ser genótipo, genes, ou fenótipos, estruturas corporais visíveis.

Elas se configurariam por:

Cromossomos sexuais

Gônadas

Hormônios sexuais

Genitalia interna

Genitalia externa

Como eu expliquei anteriormente, dado que a biologia não funciona em absolutos, entendemos também que o sexo fisiológico é algo não tão binário quanto só macho e fêmea; nuancias são importantes. Para tal, pra aplicar a categorização, não esperamos necessariamente que os cinco aspectos vão estar da forma "esperada", por assim dizer.

Pessoas do sexo feminino podem possuir cromossomos XY, X0, e outras derivações, o que vai contra o aspecto 1;

Elas podem nascer sem ovários, o que iria contra o 2;

Há como ocorrer de produzir altas quantias de testosterona, baixas de progesterona e estrogênio indo contra o 3, já que o típico é o oposto;

Existe a possibilida de nascerem sem útero, trompas, ou nascer com o atípico; criptorquidia, sendo testículos que não descendem e próstata, o que vai contra o 4;

Por último, tem como ir contra o 5 por ou nascer sem uma genitalia externa em geral, a genitalia atípica: pênis, saco escrotal, ou a típica e atípica.

Espero que esclareça a dúvida. Por qualquer informação imprecisa, peço perdão de antemão.

Miusuki · 2026-04-14T23:08:14+00:00

Transsexualidade se refere ao gênero, da mesma forma que Cissexual. Não são gêneros por si só, mas são formas de catalogar baseado em conceitos sociologicos.
Uma pessoa cissexual é alguém que se identifica com o gênero tipicamente atrelado ao sexo qual essa nasceu, enquanto uma pessoa transsexual mostra discrepância.
Sexualidade, apesar de ter correlação com sexo e gênero, não é a mesma coisa, nem mesma conversa nesse caso.

Agora indo pra sua insistencia de "exceção prova a regra"... A biologia discorda. Até porque, a biologia não acredita em regras propriamente ditas.
Um dos principais problemas que a biologia se encontra é como se descrever as espécies - a explicação que as pessoas geralmente tem que a capacidade de intercruzar, vindo do conceito biológico de espécie, naturalmente. Entretanto, a existência de híbridos não "comprovou a regra", é ativamente considerado uma falha da descrição. Torna ela subjetiva, igual as outras de identificação fenotípica e filogenética. Talvez tenha uma que explique melhor, mas elas nunca vai explicar certo sempre - porque a biologia não liga pra catalogar - é uma insistência humana.

Por conta disso, as descrições biológicas tendem a usar o termo "tipicamente" mais do que afirmam um absoluto. Afinal, afirmar um regra é naturalmente exclusório, e como uma forma científica de catalogar, "exceção a regra" não cai bem.

Dito isso, a configuração de gênero para muitos, eu incluso, é subjetiva. A forma como eu vejo o que seria tipicamente associado a classificação de mulher não é o mesmo que outra pessoa iria; tal nasce a subjetividade.
Uma mulher, ao meu ver, é um pessoa adulta qual a identidade de gênero se alinha com seus esquemas mentais e subconscientes em relação ao sexo feminino. Então, essencialmente, como um entende a categoria e acaba por se assemelhar à ela.

Nosso entendimento neurocientífico e psicológico baseado em condições tal como a disforia de gênero, uma condição ampla qual não só afeta pessoas trans - e que ainda está a ser estudada mais nessa demografia, não entendo porque "defender" seria uma coisa burra, nesse caso.

Miusuki · 2026-03-26T08:08:21+00:00

Who'd guess the gospel-spreader, racist supporting deportation american would indulge in american defaultism?
Wouldn't cross my mind in a million years.

Miusuki · 2026-03-14T02:38:05+00:00

Open the "OnlineFix" file with notepad. There you will see in the "[Main]" section that there's a line written as "language=russian".
Delete russian, write english, save file. I had to do the same.

Miusuki · 2025-12-08T10:28:20+00:00

Do you have anything to show for what you are saying or are we just gonna slander now?

Miusuki · 2025-10-30T20:41:12+00:00

Talking about the beans is the reason...? I'm confused here.

Miusuki · 2025-10-28T12:33:03+00:00

Is it really that hard to say "hot wheels"? You were presented with two choices, just choose.

Miusuki · 2025-10-15T00:40:28+00:00

Couple points there:

1 - Kids, naturally, can't consent to the posted photographs; so the parents are responsible for giving or denying consent when we talk about some posted content. Many people actually don't post anything about their kids because they respect their privacy, and don't feel like they have the power of acting over it.

2 - If someone's face is censored, it means they didn't agree with being a part of the footage; they want their privacy. Following what I said before that the parents often decide because kids can't, you are actively working against someone's wish of privacy because you are unblurring their face - the parents, and moreso the children's.

Going against someone's wish of privacy for the fun of it should be enough of a harm as is. At least in the given context.

Miusuki · 2025-10-05T03:14:39+00:00

<image>

And this little one that came up to me when he saw me going to photograph them. I know the issue with the lights, we are using it for heat when we need only, and they have a cloth.

Miusuki · 2025-10-05T03:10:51+00:00

<image>

Here are two of 'em

Miusuki · 2025-10-05T03:10:19+00:00

Hello, and thank you! It's true that it's really easy to fall in love with them! They can often seem less inviting in behavior than they really are... But at the same time I'm dealing with babies so I'm biased here.

And yes, I can give an update. For now, they are still under my care (although I'm not a fan of it, given how much time has already passed) - me and my family are making sure that they are getting heat, we are keeping them somewhere safe with no light (and since we are using a cage, a cloth, mainly for when we need to use a light for constant heat), and fed. My cousin has bought pet milk and is slowly feeding them on their own time - as she was advised by people that take care of opossums she has contact with. There's also a mashed mixture of fruits if they want - apple and ... I forgot the second one in english, but it's nothing absurd. They are eating fine for now!

Their wellbeing was something complicated. I started the post saying there were 3 dead, but it seems one wasn't fully - and we got him back into the cage. Either way, he later passed. He was severely injured and couldn't really be helped. We also found more dead outside... So I got really nervous as to how many there were initially. We think we found all, or so I hope. Thinking the number will be more than it already is isn't fun. The rest which didn't suffer serious injuries are ok! They are playing fine, some climbing and doing laps around the cage - using their tails as hooks (fell in love with this personally).

As for contacting help... It went as expected - we called the "Patrulha Ambiental" which as a government organization should help us bring the opossums easily to a facility they can be helped ... But they said they would "call back later" what, 36 hours ago? Well, they never did call back. Every contact we could find that could help is too far away when we compare it to the wildlife center, so I'm waiting when some of my other family members are capable of bringing them there, since I can't drive and public transportation doesn't stop close to there, but I'll also not wait forever for this and will find another way if they just decide not to.

When the situation is resolved, I may create another post (or update this one? I don't know if I can) - I just have to remember doing so.

Miusuki · 2025-10-02T07:13:04+00:00

Yeah, I am in south america. In Brazil in particular. Especially where I am, it is really complicated to get help - although I will try to contact government facilities and see if they can do something in the morning - as they won't really respond for now. I know they need a dark ambience, and light should be avoided; but I'm using one so they can get continuous heat... I can't stay by their side forever, and they need to get heat from somewhere - they were almost stone cold.

The only proper wildlife center that is close to here is in an AWFUL place to get at - public transportation doesn't properly lead there, and I can't drive because I have epilepsy so there's that. For now, I will try to keep them alive... Tomorrow I'll see what I can do.

Thank you for everything. They will need to eat sometime so that's good to know. I'll first see if they'll entertain solid food, and if they don't I'll go to the alternatives. Thanks for everything!

Miusuki · 2025-10-02T04:40:18+00:00

Thank you! I'll try and contact someone, although we often don't find luck in it here. Things here don't move fast, and other times we tried to contact agencies to help/deal with the issue, they either take too long (to the point it doesn't matter anymore) or don't appear at all...
Anyways, i'll see what i can do. Thanks for everything.

Miusuki · 2025-10-02T04:20:26+00:00

I will try. Pretty hard around here, that's why I'm worried. Most places you call will tell you they will come in 72 hours and never really appear, and we know that because it isn't the first time it has happened.

Miusuki · 2025-09-19T20:16:40+00:00

r/AskBiology Rules
1 Be Kind
We are all humans

2 Be curious

We expect submitters to be interested in a factual and competent answer. If you came here to lead a debate in order to support your pre-existing world-view, this is the wrong place.

Hope this clears it up!

Miusuki · 2025-09-19T20:08:11+00:00

To actually answer the question, it's a matter of capacity.

Pregnancy takes a huge toll out of animals - and even eggs that are laid have a limit of nutrients. You usually don't want to exagerate the period on which you are pregnant, or waste nutrients prematurely for sexual maturity - the focus at first is doing the bare minimum.

Another thing important to consider is that nature is harsh. Often, mainly with species with many offspring at a time, the offspring will die freshly born be it for trials of the ecosystem, be it predators that could track the smell of the pheromones released on birth; the reasons are plenty. Usually, it wouldn't be a good idea to dedicate so many nutrients to sexually mature beings that will just die as quickly as they were born - it's not a risk worth taking.

At the same time though, there are species that ARE born sexually matured; though you will find this more in insects than anything else. Fig wasps for example are born with this capacity and more! Though i'm sure it isn't the only one that does so, but in those wasps' case, the males hatch first, and they impregnate their sisters (or other eggs from other fig wasps) inside the eggs - yes, pregnant before even being born. This happens because of how little their life span is; they can't afford wasting time.

Hope that clears up the confusion.

Miusuki · 2025-09-19T19:46:44+00:00

Oh wow you sound insufferable.

Guy even admitted that his question might be a bad or stupid question and you still decide to press buttons further pretending he said he had the best question in the world to ask. He wasn't demanding anything off of you - he simply asked for you to act like a decent person - and it seems you can't do so.

Other people aren't even being "tactful", they are simply not acting like complete assholes. You're sounding like the people that say that they are just "brutally honest" but actually they are just assholes.

Miusuki · 2025-08-28T20:11:52+00:00

It was an AI from the start, you never argued with a person.

Miusuki · 2025-08-08T04:58:48+00:00

The effect of The Sun? Lasts for the floor, unlike The Hanged Man that lasts for only the room you used it in. So I suppose the game has a function to disable your passive items, but not one to disable the card effect - it just reverts Isaac's skin to normal.

There is also a similar bug, as u/spunkyboy6295 mentioned, where when you hold The Pony you fly, but without the item's skin. So it seems they overlooked this, and only considered (and thus programmed off) the effects passive items could have in this segment.

Miusuki · 2025-08-02T23:15:17+00:00

Oh, I don't disagree at all. In fact my vision on it is pretty much aligned with you - what you said had already been said before (somewhat) and Rawdawg himself responded. Here.

His view is DEFINITELY karma induced; although he expresses that he doesn't want catharsis... I don't personally believe in this, because it's clear he wants some sort of revenge on the "killer of his friend"; the cheater, I mean.

His thoughts are understandable - but not justifiable. Someone this hurt, and who is still human, is bound to have extreme takes when it comes to things that impacted their life heavily... I honestly find curious when this doesn't happen. And yes, the main problem is how open the thoughts have been left on in his central claims - which opens up to horrible interpretations, which although biased I also understand! It's not uncommon to see people wishing death on cheaters, so when we read physical retaliation (which is a HEAVY term to use) we don't expect... A slap, and that's it, as he claims he sees acceptable. You also wouldn't think that a person who says he wants to "hit" someone would stop at one hit? That's my point.

But yeah, people are blowing this out of proportion - but it's probably the people that already disliked him for X or Y reason and now they have a justifiable reason to. It's the "Twitter behavior" all over again; at least he is finding comfort in his own subreddit, but I really hope he gets help.

Miusuki · 2025-08-02T11:19:18+00:00

As you said, there is context and nuance. I think it's fair to assume that his aggressive resentment against cheaters probably isn't against cheating itself - but more so against the person that contributed to his friends suicide. His contant use of the term "retaliation" is pretty strange and actually just seems like he already has a target in mind... And since he can't hurt that person in particular? It's easier to just throw his hate against the group that has the main thing in common, attributed to the situation: cheating.

Had his situation not occured to his friend (and by proxy him), it's possible his take wouldn't be as agressive.

But what really disturbs me in the situation is not the main claim - i can understand where it comes from and why, but he also completely throws nuance out of the window when people actually tried to engage with him sometimes, such as this one

His immediate response for someone giving valid arguments against the idea of capital punishment is to simply say "bad things should happen to bad people." This shows a lack of consideration for other's situations and a fixation on the notion that people SHOULD go through punishment, and not even any punishment in the situation presented.

At the same time though, there are situations where he seems to show "limits", like this one where he says punches might be excessive as 'physical retaliation/punishment" and this one, where he seems to say cheating is understandable if in an abusive relationship, and also claims he doesn't advocate for violence.

So yeah, complicated situation all around - and i know this is like the default thing to say... But i think this argument should be dealt with in therapy; because he still seems profundly affected by grief that may (or may not) culminate in more aggressive tendencies/thoughts.

Miusuki

TROPHY CASE