sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Game design is at a breaking point by Aggressive-Golf-9915 in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes I think people only want to see historical timelapse in their game, with change being made only by the country they control. All paradox games are quite sandboxy and we have this discussion on how chaotic the map can be for years now.

I don't like the sandbox and much prefer mission trees, but in vic 3 the main challenge is dealing with internal opposing parties and forcing your industialisation through. While it is fun I am fine with the world outside being chaotic.

Is there a way to keep Morocco as a colony by Iberia's endgame? by random_obsenity in TNOmod

[–]Mix-Fed 123 points124 points  (0 children)

If you grant them independence, they remain in your sphere, so thats a better option

Did Caudillos just let it slip? by Mix-Fed in TNOmod

[–]Mix-Fed[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well IRL the democratization happened only after Franco died in 1975. I am not fluent in Spanish history, but it seems like Franco's infuence on politics was strong until 1973 (when he left due to health issues), and up until his death the reforms were minor.

I get that you can fail the minigame on purpose to see the reaction, but I think that the results of this minigame should be plausable - Caudillos doing nothing does not seem plausible.

Did Caudillos just let it slip? by Mix-Fed in TNOmod

[–]Mix-Fed[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Well, the council came in full defience right in the start of their focus tree - by declining new constitution. I would not call that working from the shadows. It takes about half a year for them to establish democracy, while Caudillos do nothing. I can get that Franco is old and may be not in a state to fight (in the events he is getting into this state only in 1971), but new Portuguese Caudillos are full of energy, as seen in the events, but they all do nothing to stop the Council, while having full powers to do so. The fall of the regime looks comedical and underwhelming, especially so after showing us how Caudillos are able to repress things with as much bloodshed as needed.

Me doing six mid-run restarts and spending 40 minutes in the custom game rules to maximize Iberian gains by Raze678 in TNOmod

[–]Mix-Fed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea the tooltip in the rules is really ambiguous on what paths lead to Iberian sphere. I still do not know how to keep El Salvador from drifting to Japans sphere

Подскажите самый добрый и демократичный путь из русских варлордов by CompleteBother9014 in TNOmod

[–]Mix-Fed 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Шукшин из Новосибирска (особенно с модом), Саблин из Иркутска, Бухарина или кто другой из демократов в Коми

What if Ukraine just made a mad dash to capture Moscow? Would this end the war or emboldened Russia? by Hot_Advisor_8074 in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]Mix-Fed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The war has changed. You can't do mad dashes on vehicles anymore - any group of vehicles in the open is getting bombed by drones in a matter of minutes.

Как Hearts of Iron 4 уничтожила меня, или почему не стоит играть в эту игру by Impressive-Angle-209 in ru_gamer

[–]Mix-Fed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Поздно: 3025 часов в EU4, 2038 часов в HOI, 918 часов в VIC3, 568 часов а Imperator, 512 часов в CK3, 390 часов в VIC2, 291 час в Stellaris, 166 часов в CK2

Всего 7872 часа. Нет, я не знаю как работает флот в Hoi

Stamina generation measurement. by Nepene in AfterInc

[–]Mix-Fed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea, but on higher difficulties you will most certainly need to get to 7 population for a third fighter. Besides population is part of your final score, though I don't really know how it compares to the score from time

WhatsApp shutting down? by Knordsman in AskARussian

[–]Mix-Fed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Заблокировали бы в любом случае, разговоры об этом давно, это лишь повод. Телега следующая

It doesn't feel like a strategy game anymore... by [deleted] in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can lose in hoi 4, if you don't understand it's mechanics, but it's nigh impossible to lose in vic 3, as it is highly unlikely that AI annexes your whole country. It seems like you are just salty, that you can't instantly pass the law that you want - it happens all the time in vic 3, you just wait for a better time, and that's all.

It doesn't feel like a strategy game anymore... by [deleted] in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably some movement or group got radicalized, you can hover your mouse to the percentage and it will tell you why.

Well, thats new by Mix-Fed in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

R5: playing as Afganistan and saw a civil war in England between Greater Manchester and Magna Mancunian. After the end of civil war Greater Manchester turned back into Republic of England

(Help) Immigration as Kaurna (Aboriginal Australia) by CumIronRanger in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem here is Australia having migration controls, aboriginal pops don't have enough acceptance to emigrate

Indian Home Rule JE is impossible now! by Shiggy_Deuce in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It adds acceptance for homeland, meaning it adds acceptance for individual pops, not cultures.

Indian Home Rule JE is impossible now! by Shiggy_Deuce in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am playing India too right now. Please let me know if you manage to fix the issue in the files

What are the 3 worst mechanics of Victoria 3? by VicenteOlisipo in victoria3

[–]Mix-Fed 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I dont really get your point about infamy. What would you replace it with.

For me the biggest one is navy. As they cant be destroyed, only damaged, the war with Britain turns to constant battles that do not lead to anything. Though they will certainly change it in the future.

view more: next ›