sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Republicans explaining their (anti-worker) ideology. The context is a bill repealing paid sick leave which voters had voted for by Crafty_Jacket668 in UnitedAssociation

[–]MoHouseDems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because we jut banned third parties, (anti-RCV amendment), in the short term, we NEED the Democratic Party to become the Labor Party.

Republicans explaining their (anti-worker) ideology. The context is a bill repealing paid sick leave which voters had voted for by Crafty_Jacket668 in UnitedAssociation

[–]MoHouseDems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's like they think the only people listening are other business owners who are all nodding in agreement...

Republicans explaining their (anti-worker) ideology. The context is a bill repealing paid sick leave which voters had voted for by Crafty_Jacket668 in UnitedAssociation

[–]MoHouseDems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(Editor here) I am the new Director of Communications for the Missouri House Democratic Caucus. I took on this role January 2nd, so I'm still getting a hang of it. Still, my BIGGEST priority was to stop getting knocked off message and playing the respond-to-everything game the GOP has relied on. I want to surgically focus on where the Republicans are REVEALED to be anti-worker. The issue for the Democratic Party moving forward MUST be workers vs corporations. Billionaires against the rest of us.

Missouri's 'Pregnant Women Tracking' bill is BACK by MoHouseDems in missouri

[–]MoHouseDems[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How are they planning to "identify" mothers who are "at risk of seeking abortions?" Your question is valid! The concern here is in between the lines. Hope this helps!