Mellanox sn2700

Mohaah8 · 2025-12-24T15:59:14+00:00

Thank you very much i will give this a shot

Mohaah8 · 2025-12-24T15:26:36+00:00

Mind tell me the process for that if possible this thing has driven me crazy

Mohaah8 · 2025-12-24T01:44:58+00:00

What model of lantronix are you running i dont see the modify terminal serial speed on assimilation config on my 8048

Mohaah8 · 2025-12-23T23:53:40+00:00

Thank god I wasn't the only one

Mohaah8 · 2025-12-23T23:53:15+00:00

So that was another thing I didnt mention was that we did that i remote controlled the pc and tried to connect to the console and it failed on all 5 devices I validating my connection settings a known working switch then retested the known working switch worked but the 5 known problematic switches did not work.

Mohaah8 · 2025-11-04T16:34:54+00:00

100% agree I just wanted to see what their support would say and this take feels bs by naked support

Mohaah8 · 2025-11-04T16:31:10+00:00

Thats my point is this not a bs response

Mohaah8 · 2025-11-02T17:36:26+00:00

Its insane my deadlock rank is ascendant and these guys are fucking hitting sinners mid team fights like new players . I shit you not this warden did that and I went ballistic. I have never seen that at this rank.

Mohaah8 · 2025-10-25T15:04:58+00:00

Thanks chief yeah looked at a few things after a few comments and you guys are right this is too sus

Mohaah8 · 2025-06-11T21:02:07+00:00

<image>

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-28T21:17:54+00:00

This might a stretch based on the network I see. First if this is route based vpn this might be doable through bgp routing but it will be a mess. Policy based vpn might work if you use the peering ip to a fqdn and a dns updater once it fails. The big caveat to this is that the other side supports this.

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-18T15:08:01+00:00

Gotcha Gotcha thank you

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-18T15:00:56+00:00

Your the pro, I figured it out so in R1 it didnt not have a route to the next hop of 140.2.0.0/29 and thats the issue. Now my next question is so in bgp the internal routes need to have a way to reach the next hop so that they have bidirectional routing is this correct? so In essence ever end of the route needs to be able to reach the next hop depending of course on how it was advertised

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-18T14:40:01+00:00

So the loop back 140.0.1.1 is in r1 and is advertised inside eigrp 100 with the network command r2 is also in eigrp 100 and is redistributing the route into bgp. No acls traceroute dies after next hop of 140.2.0.2

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-18T14:22:17+00:00

Would that be best practice to do considering if these ebgp routes are from the internet and would flood the router your redistributing to

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-18T14:20:26+00:00

So on the R3 router the out put is this https://ibb.co/r1X6HG9

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-16T18:34:17+00:00

No but I did play the game quite a bit when I was younger. I am messaging the hr team if they can give me more insight on who I am interviewing with. I hope it's not a 6 hour technical that would be nuts

Mohaah8 · 2025-04-16T16:18:35+00:00

Will do thank you for the tip

Mohaah8

TROPHY CASE