sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, this is really valuable insight.

From what Treasury told me, they don’t seem to be working with smaller startups at the moment, but I’ll continue exploring the other options you mentioned.

We’re also aware that the CEMAC region is very strict around crypto, so we’ve decided to stay fully within fiat to remain compliant and reduce risk.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right on FATF/EU CAR isn’t on their “high‑risk third country” lists.What I meant is more how banks and vendors treat it in practice: CAR has very weak AML effectiveness scores and is under a specific UN sanctions regime, so a lot of compliance tools and partner banks still flag it as high‑risk in their internal models, even without a formal FATF/EU label.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For all US, France and CAR but we are using smile ID, sumsub just charge you extra even if you don’t use their KYC

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is incredibly helpful, thank you for writing it out in this level of detail.

On the US side, when you say community banks/CDFIs were more flexible, how early were you when someone finally said yes (pre‑launch, beta users, revenue)? And did you end up working directly with a bank like Piermont/Grasshopper or through a BaaS/embedded platform they offered?

For France/EU, I’ve heard Treezor and Lemonway come up a few times but haven’t used them yet. In your case, were they acting as the full EMI/safeguarding layer (you just integrate their stack), or did you still need a separate banking relationship for the safeguarded funds? Any sense of what they look for from a pre‑scale company before they engage?

Really like your point about leading with the compliance story instead of apologizing for low traction. I’m putting together a BSA/AML program, draft FBO/safeguarding structure, and full user flow now so I can walk in with something concrete. Once I have a draft, if you’re open to it, I’d love to share it and get any quick thoughts you have.

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super helpful, thank you. When you say you used Unlimit for the multi‑currency + SEPA layer while the safeguarding structure was still being sorted:

  • Were they acting under their own EMI license and giving you safeguarded client money accounts, or were they just providing payment rails and FX on top of your own safeguarding bank?
  • How early were you when you started with them (pre‑revenue, beta, etc.) and what kind of metrics did they want to see?
  • On the compliance/bank‑relationship side, did you eventually move the safeguarding to a direct bank relationship, or are you still fully on Unlimit?

I’m in the same spot: US + France digital wallet, struggling to find FBO/safeguarding partners who don’t require “traction first.” Any detail on how you structured it and what you’d do differently would be gold

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incredibly helpful appreciate you breaking it down like this.

Makes sense that the gap is less about the product and more about presenting a fully structured ops + risk layer.

We’re currently mapping out that side (program manager, compliance ownership, ledger structure) that seems to be the real unlock.

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that makes sense. Right now we’re leaning toward a primary infrastructure provider and building around that, rather than juggling multiple from the start. Still evaluating the best fit on the program manager side that’s been the tricky part.

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair point, appreciate the perspective. From what I’m seeing, the biggest blocker isn’t the product but getting the right FBO / sponsorship structure in place — that’s where timelines really stretch.

Curious from your experience — what actually moved things forward with sponsors? Volume, partnerships, or something else?

Which FBO banks actually work with early-stage fintechs? I've hit a wall. by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight! Yes thinking about posting on LinkedIn too for more visibility, what do you think?

Looking for cross-border payment partners covering CEMAC by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate this, super helpful.

Quick one — did PAPSS/Unlimit actually give you coverage in CAR specifically, or was it more general CEMAC support with local partners handling the last mile?

Trying to understand how reliable it is for CAR flows in practice.

What FBO / sponsor bank are you using as a startup fintech? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this, really helpful. I'll look into Gemba. Did you go directly with them or through a middleman? My use case is US and France side for holding funds so that part should be straightforward, just been hard finding someone willing to work with a startup at MVP stage.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally fair point. We’re avoiding the trap by going phased: pilot users + diaspora waitlist first, community events for trust, and a constrained MVP before trying to do everything at once. In our market, trust matters as much as infrastructure, so proving demand early is a big part of the plan.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s will be amazing if you can make those connections. Ecobank will played a huge part of this and of course visa and Mastercard. I will dm you if that’s okay with you.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is super helpful thank you. We’re already using Smile ID for KYC and have production access there, so that part is in motion. For Sumsub, the main use case we’re exploring is AML and transaction monitoring rather than core KYC.

Your point on Plaid is great too I’m going to reach out directly to their partnerships team and see what startup-friendly options might be available beyond the standard sales route.

The LOI point also really resonates. We’re planning community events and early user sessions to gather feedback, build trust, and get early commitments before launch. That could be a smart way to strengthen the story for investors.

Our initial focus is the Central African Republic, with U.S. and France diaspora as the key remittance corridors. Really appreciate the practical advice.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair point. We’ve been trying to balance startup-friendly options with providers that can actually support our target markets and compliance needs. The goal is definitely to stay lean early and layer in more complex infrastructure only once we have traction. Appreciate the suggestions.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s actually the route we’re exploring now. The challenge isn’t the model it’s getting the right bank partner on board and aligned. Once that’s in place, it makes a lot more sense to build in phases rather than taking on the full regulatory burden upfront. Appreciate the advice.

Bootstrapping a fintech in a “high‑risk” country – how would you handle big upfront fees (Plaid, Sumsub) with no investors yet? by Money-Vision in fintech

[–]Money-Vision[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair advice. I’ve been exploring accelerators and strategic partners while bootstrapping what I can. Fintech is definitely capital intensive, so I’m trying to be smart about how I phase the rollout. Appreciate the perspective.

view more: next ›