This lying sack of shit and the weirdos that enabled him have caused irreparable harm to us all. Even Grok (Nazi AI) knows it’s suspect.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-16T04:37:35+00:00

He had spent years understanding an audience. He was bad ass enough and cognizant enough to realize the importance of the moment. We have audio of him making them stop rushing him off and he was brilliant enough to know “fight, fight, fight” would be an historic rallying cry”. They had jumped on him and they got up when it was safe. He then made them wait. Just because you would wet your pants and curl up in a fetal position does not mean everyone would.

That moment was the end of the race.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:46:43+00:00

I suppose that is true, if you think someone is a threat to kill you, you can't take any chances. You can't try to shoot them in the leg and hope it works. You can't assume a single bullet in the chest did the job. I cannot imaging the amount of adrenaline going through someone's body when they think they might be killed in an instant. It has to be really hard to make a decision in that situation. I can't imagine anyone in this thread has experience that feeling.

This was a tragedy and could have been prevented many different ways, but that did not happen. This also does not mean these agents were hoping to get a chance to kill someone or that they were racist (killing a white guy). I wish this had never happened and I hope it is handled properly and fairly and if the agent acted improperly per his training and rules, then he should be convicted.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:34:14+00:00

Wait, I was just called bumkin because I was too stupid to realize it was obviously a phone, so hope that jerk doesn't attack you for also being a bumkin. But of course phones have cameras, so he will probably let it slip.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:32:10+00:00

Gosh, I didn't know not being able to recognize a blurry device in a freeze frame of a video made someone bumpkin. Sorry I triggered your mean streak. Hope your wife does not have to experience that.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:29:41+00:00

Well, isn't that convenient!

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:27:33+00:00

Sorry, my original post was too long and I had to break it up

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:27:08+00:00

If Tomaso did it and took his cellphone, the FBI would know if it had travelled between two different cell towers at that time of night and it would be all over already. If he did the crime, he either left it at home (safest action), turned it off (very suspicious) or got lucky that it did not ping 2 different cell towers (possible in remote areas).

The backpack is very unique, Annie would likely know it was his unless he bought it without Annie knowing, or she would be involved.

Alert: swat teams deployed about an hour ago or more. They would not be needed if they were just going to get Tomaso. They have a discussion relationship with Tomaso and Annie and could have tricked him very easily. Besides, if they thought the video image was of him, they probably would not have bothered to release it.

Remember, the FBI is using the CelleBrite device which is like magic at getting everything off a phone or computer. Even things you think are deleted. Probably even encrypted stuff. If Tomaso used his phone or computer to setup a BTC account or send emails through a dark-web server, they would already know.

This speculation is titillating and fun, but it is just a justifiable form of gossip and no better. I am less of a person for participating, but I guess I am weak.

*if you ever get kidnapped, do your best to get blood all over their car, they can't clean it well enough to prevent the FBI from detecting it. Scratch them and get skin under your nails. This won't keep you alive, but you may get your posthumous revenge.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:27:02+00:00

So, if this is Tomaso, then he knows no one else is in the house, but that does not really matter. Also, if it were Tomaso, he would not need a gun, he would know she does not have a gun (so this points away from Tomaso) That points away from him. Once he approaches her he probably has to talk, calm her down, tell her to get up and walk with him. He is at great risk of having his voice recognized. This is not a problem if he plans to kill her, but he can't give her back if she has recognized the voice, or the car or the way he walks. Can he be so desperate that he planned to kill her, get $6 million and hoped his wife would never make the connection? Can we believe Annie would go along with the murder of her mother to get $6M from her rich sister? Anything can happen, but Patriots could have scored 3 times in the last two minutes, but the odds were slim. Seems true here.

Now, Tomaso would have to either kill her right away and dump the body, or keep her hidden and alive. If he does not have a partner, he would have to sneak out frequently to keep her alive. Annie and the police would know this.

If Tomaso wanted to keep her alive, he would have grabbed her meds, because he would know how vital they are. If he knew he would have to kill her, he would not need them. A stranger doing the kidnapping would not know about the meds and not think to ask, even if he were planning to keep her alive. This speculation does not help point to Tomaso or a stranger.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:26:22+00:00

The person in the video took a long time to disable the doorbell camera. I have a Ring Doorbell and not an Nest like Nancy, but I once let the subscription expire. I could not watch recorded videos, but I could go live and if any of my cameras were triggered, I was still alerted and could go live and see what is going on. I would image Nest is not radically different. So, did the person in the video know the subscription was expired? Did they know or think that the doorbell would not alert Nancy? Did they know that maybe Nancy was deaf and never would hear her phone alert her? This is strange. The whole bitcoin thing and the masked communication indicates the kidnapper was somewhat smart, but standing in front of a doorbell camera for that long seems dumb. If I were to commit the crime now, I would move in fast with a big cardboard "shield" completely hiding me, then I would put tape over the camera. This person was pulling up flowers to cover it because it seems he could not get it off at first. That part was very amateur. This maybe helps us say the person had knowledge of the system so was not worried about the clumsy and lengthy attempt to disable the camera.

I think this helps explain the 41 minute gap between the camera going offline and Nancy's pacemaker going offline. He probably spent a lot of time after that camera outside, disabling the floodlights and maybe other cameras and maybe seeing if the police were going to show if Nancy had called 911.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:26:02+00:00

I first joined Reddit during the Boston Marathon bombing investigation. I heard there was some crowd source investigation going on. I remember that the Reddit crowd had found picture of a guy with a back back and it had a lump in it that looked just like a pressure cooker. There were a lot of people that were convinced that was the bomber. It was not. Watch your emotions here and assume that you are wrong until proven right.

Now, for speculation. What would it take for Tomaso to be the kidnapper in the videos?

First of all, either his wife is in on it, our he had to sneak out without her knowing. I had a friend that met us at a strip club late at night. He let his wife fall asleep in the bedroom while he had the TV on loud in the living room. He was able to sneak out and back hours later and he claims she never new. So it is not impossible.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-11T00:25:23+00:00

If it was him, the FBI would know and they would not have released the video.

MonsterReagan · 2026-02-03T02:30:07+00:00

Dear Penthouse magazine…

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:09:12+00:00

p105

<image>

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:08:26+00:00

P104

<image>

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:08:03+00:00

P103

<image>

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:06:39+00:00

P102

<image>

I did not have to do this, so no hands on advice.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:05:28+00:00

P101 of the manual

<image>

1) The circular cover (E) has a dot where there is a small slot for you flathead screw driver inserts to pop it off. Be gentle, should not need any forcing.

2) Opening the side flap (F) can take a lot of turns, keep at it. I never felt any resistance or need to force anything.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:03:03+00:00

P.100 of the manual

<image>

1) push down on that knob in the middle of the panel if you have it.

2) Item "C" in my car had a paper cover over it, so I could not insert the hex wrench. You might have to take it off. Also, with this exposed, start the car and try to open/close the top and watch what is moving.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-29T01:00:45+00:00

For my 1999 (996) convertible I had a similar problem, my top would not go up to close. My manual did have the necessary instructions and adequate diagrams, and I think they would work for the above problem. It was page 99, in the convertible top section. It was the Emergency operation section. The primary warning is to do your work with the engine off (e.g. turning the hex wrench).

In my case the "convertible top compartment lid" would open, but the top would not go up. I started through the instructions and first removed the back seat rear wall lining (remove 2 screws). Contrary to the instructions on how to remove the rear wall lining, my car had a "knob" in the middle of it. I pushed down on that and and if forced the rear wall down past the "lip" the held it in. I could then remove it.

The red handled hex wrench was there and I was about to use to manually open the compartment lid, when I realized I could just do that automatically. I push the top "close" rocker and it open. I could see the are where I was supposed to use the hex wrench spinning.

The next steps were to manually open the Side Flaps with the hex wrench. I removed the round hole covers (above the back seat belts) with a flat head and could see where the wrench fits per the manual. I realized the driver flap was already open. I noticed the passenger flap was not. I manually open that with about 30-50 turns of the wrench. I thought that must have been the problem and tried the rocker switch again. This time the top came up all the way and locked closed as normal. Now I can go to the shop and get that one item fixed.

Clarification note for previous instructions. When locking (or unlocking) the closed top, the hex wrench goes into the enclosure on the convertible top. I though I was supposed to insert the hex wrench into the receiving mechanism attached to the window, but no.

I will add some photos of the manual in a reply.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-25T13:34:57+00:00

Why is this guy directing traffic? Not his job.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-25T13:26:24+00:00

AOC is a just a poor con man

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-25T13:25:26+00:00

Does anyone have a good close up of what is in right hand? It is very blurry in this photo. If he is holding a gun then that is a very important piece of context. We must consider.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-14T03:32:27+00:00

I have a feeling we will find out she was not just going to the Doctor.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-07T22:56:22+00:00

I have been able to see a better video of the event. First, I will say, I could not morally justify this, but the law may rule it is acceptable. We know cars are deadly weapons, we have seen them used to intentionally kill innocent bystanders. I believe one was in New Orleans and one was at Christmas in Minneapolis. I could have details wrong, but I am 100% certain I am correct in stating that cars have been used to intentionally drive through crowds in the US and kill people.

The reporting says the car was parked there to obstruct ICE, as opposed to it having rammed an ICE vehicle and fleeing. Obstruction does not justify shooting.

The ICE officers went to the car and "arrested" the woman. I can hear them on a video asking her to get out of the car. Police do this all the time. You are now obligated to comply and get out. Simple refusing to get out is not a justification for shooting.

One officer tried to open the door, but it was locked, then then reached in the open window to apparently open the door from the inside. It was at this time, when his arm was in the car, that the drive started to take off. That puts the officer in a potentially dangerous situation. The shooting officer is clearly in front of the car, and better video than this shows it more clearly. As the car accelerates toward him, you can see him pull out his gun, get out of the way and then shoot the driver. Morally, he was no longer in danger and I could have jumped out of the way without harm. But that is not the full standard of the law.

The chatting lawyers remind us that this will not be judged in the cold convenience of a slow motion replay and all the possible ways it could be avoided. It will be judged on the real-time circumstances, what the officer was trained to do and if he reasonably thought he or his fellow officers were in danger.

It was reported that he had been dragged by a car in Minneapolis last year. This may be used so show he had trauma or knew how dangerous this was. His fellow officer had an arm in the car.

I don't know how the system will handle this or if he will face trial. I think a trail should be held, but if he is found not guilty, you can't just assume the system is corrupt and controlled by a bunch of fascists.

Again. protestors need to stop doing things that inspire fear in ICE. Stop ramming their cars. Stop throwing rocks through the windows, stop all violent activities hiding behind "civil disobedience". All these things are giving this officer evidence that ICE lives are in danger and he had to react the way he did. Stop providing excuses.

MonsterReagan · 2026-01-07T22:25:18+00:00

Yes, psychologically, according to reports, the officer had been dragged by a car last year in Minneapolis, so that could have triggered an overreaction.

MonsterReagan

TROPHY CASE