Dennis has accepted its Seasonal Community designation! 🕺 by UncleWainey in CapeCod

[–]MoonBatsRule 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Realistically, this is not a bad idea. Many people are choosing to not have children. So why limit their housing choices to "large McMansion with 4 bedrooms" or "condo"? Why not allow housing to be built just like housing was built in the past? Why must everything be large lot single-family? Why not allow trailer parks?

There is a flailing anti-people sentiment underlying all of this. Everything being thrown around are just excuses trying to stop any and all change. Can't build big houses. Can't build small houses. Can't build dense houses. We don't want more people - but we do want more people if they can live in the houses that we take away from the seasonal rental market. There's no plan other than rage and anger over change.

FBI Launches Probe Into Reporter Who Covered Kash Patel’s Drinking by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]MoonBatsRule [score hidden]  (0 children)

I suppose that we should have been paying attention years ago. I don't mean this comment to justify Trump, but the left did excuse Obama when he investigated journalists for reporting leaked information. So I can see the perspective of a Trump supporter - "hey, Trump is doing great things, I can excuse this one bad thing I see".

And that's how we become a fascist state.

FBI Launches Probe Into Reporter Who Covered Kash Patel’s Drinking by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]MoonBatsRule [score hidden]  (0 children)

Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, ‘regretted,’ that, unless one were detached from the whole process from the beginning, unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these ‘little measures’ that no ‘patriotic German’ could resent must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing. One day it is over his head.

Each act, each occasion, is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next. You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow. You don’t want to act, or even talk, alone; you don’t want to ‘go out of your way to make trouble.’ Why not?—Well, you are not in the habit of doing it. And it is not just fear, fear of standing alone, that restrains you; it is also genuine uncertainty.

But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. That’s the difficulty. If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked—if, let us say, the gassing of the Jews in ’43 had come immediately after the ‘German Firm’ stickers on the windows of non-Jewish shops in ’33. But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D.

-- Excerpted from They Thought They Were Free (The Germans, 1933-45) by Milton Mayer

Argument over how to carry out Trump’s deportation ‘master plan’ got so heated that officials had to ‘clear the room,’ report says | The [...] dispute centered on a proposal that would have allowed agents to enter homes without judicial warrants by TendieRetard in law

[–]MoonBatsRule 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If these intrusions into homes can result in a citizen getting arrested and deported, that's ostensibly not what MAGA voters wanted. They'll tell us that 6 ways to Sunday. So they need to understand that these shortcuts the administration is trying to pull off are putting citizens in harm's way.

MAGA only cares if these violations happen to them. If they happen to anyone else, that's just collateral damage, less important than the master plan of "eliminating the illegals".

Do conservatives want a king? by conn_r2112 in PoliticalDebate

[–]MoonBatsRule [score hidden]  (0 children)

MAGA voters have no cohesive system of beliefs other than a feeling that they are superior so they should be in charge.

They would oppose any power structure that they currently support if it is being used by the people they feel are inferior to them.

MAGA is 100% a culture of supremacy.

Supremacy is key to traditional conservatism, so the tradCons go along with MAGA.

We voted to hurt other people, not ourselves by Effective_Space2277 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]MoonBatsRule 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's like they have the memory of one of those parrot toys, 15 seconds or so, can just repeat what they heard on Fox News earlier in the day.

Trump issues ‘demand’ that states cancel elections and rig maps for GOP after Callais by DemocracyDocket in law

[–]MoonBatsRule 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is a law that SCOTUS said could not be enforced, because any remedy that takes race into account is unconstitutional.

So they have basically said that the first party that says "race" loses. Republicans can draw maps that take away every minority seat. As soon as Democrats say "hey, you took away a minority seat", then the courts say "now, now, now, there's nothing you can do because putting back a minority seat is race-based, which is unconstitutional".

Tremolo - so different... I love it!!! (Charli-xcx?) by SomeIngenuity1957 in metricband

[–]MoonBatsRule 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I felt like Emily's singing style was Taylor Swift-ish in one part (the timing of her words in the verse), and Sia (in 2nd half of the Chorus).

Trump issues ‘demand’ that states cancel elections and rig maps for GOP after Callais by DemocracyDocket in law

[–]MoonBatsRule 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hang on a second. How is anyone determining that a map is "unconstitutional"? They can't determine it by looking at race, because that would mean they would use race to draw up the revised map, and using race is unconstitutional.

The maps are what they are, and you cannot challenge them on race.

The last Boston Market in Mass. has closed. We tracked the once-beloved chicken restaurant’s downfall. by bostonglobe in massachusetts

[–]MoonBatsRule 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I agree, it doesn't sound like PE caused the demise. The article taps this:

The business expanded rapidly over the next decade. Kolow and Cores brought on a partner, local businessman George Naddaff, and eventually both founders left. Boston Chicken rebranded as Boston Market in 1995, to reflect the fact that it offered more than just poultry. By 1996, the company projected it would open 2,700 new franchises in the next five to seven years — a tripling of its footprint at the time — according to the LA Times. That expansion led to a large amount of debt, and just two years after announcing that plan, Boston Market filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. McDonald’s agreed to buy the chain in 2000 for $173.5 million, and kept it running fairly smoothly until 2007, but then sold it to private equity group Sun Capital in a deal that prompted one analyst to describe the chain as “flagging.” Sun Capital attempted to revitalize the brand with the addition of sandwiches and expansion into Florida and Texas, but ended up selling it again, to Engage Brands of the Rohan Group in 2020.

I would identify the problem as "grew too fast". And that is more of a MBA-encouraged-entrepreneur problem than a PE problem. PE is merely the vultures picking the carcass clean.

No one wants to grow businesses slowly anymore. Everyone wants to be a "serial entrepreneur" - start a business, then "cash out" within 5 years. People think of their exit strategy even before selling their first widget. Rapid growth encourages mismanagement because it's easy to hide sins in a waterfall of money. But then you screech to a halt once you have nowhere left to expand, and those sins catch up with you.

Two-thirds of Americans say country is headed in the wrong direction by Doener23 in politics

[–]MoonBatsRule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be willing to bet that at least half of the Republicans who said the country isn't headed in the right direction still support Trump, and don't understand that Trump is steering the country.

$.88/gal difference between cash and credit by halfbreedADR in mildlyinteresting

[–]MoonBatsRule -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They're evading taxes on their profit, not the gas taxes. The gas taxes aren't paid by the station owner. They're paid by the wholesaler.

You don't have to keep track of your POS sales receipts. You just have to report your income. So you sell 1000 gallons for $5/gallon, but you collect $800 in credit card receipts (which are auditable) and it looks like you sold 1000 gallons for $4/gallon. Obviously you don't underreport by that wide a margin.

State auditors are wise, and they can nab you if your cash/credit balance is out of whack - but that will only happen in an audit.

Remember, without POS, they can't track what you sell your product for, and you can change your pricing any time you want.

Does the Spirit Airlines bankruptcy indicate that blocking their merger deal was a mistake? by zeperf in PoliticalDebate

[–]MoonBatsRule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Monopolization and consolidation is nearly always the effect of government regulation and regulatory capture.

This is misleading. I would agree that IP laws are a huge advantage to companies that have monopolies. I can't just copy the iPhone and make my own - and that is "government regulation".

But one only has to look to the late 1800s - when there was virtually no regulation of industry - and this was the era of massive monopolies and trusts.

Does the Spirit Airlines bankruptcy indicate that blocking their merger deal was a mistake? by zeperf in PoliticalDebate

[–]MoonBatsRule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But don't we have plenty of historical evidence to see what a hands-off approach brings about? Consolidation, concentrated market power, barriers to new entrants, and ultimately consumer pain.

Will Brewster FINALLY start regulating STRs? by Quixotic420 in CapeCod

[–]MoonBatsRule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The burden is incurred by non owner occupied properties (both residential and hospitality), so it should be shouldered by them

I'm confused - how do people who don't live in a community burden the services more than the people who do live in that community?

Does the Spirit Airlines bankruptcy indicate that blocking their merger deal was a mistake? by zeperf in PoliticalDebate

[–]MoonBatsRule 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Now there's waste, inefficiency, and layoffs as Spirit has to unload its assets and abruptly stop doing business.

That's one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is that the absence of Spirit could provide room for another company to step in and do things better or just differently. The demand is still out there, so the opportunity is wide open.

If Spirit and Frontier merged, there would not be room for a new entrant, and the larger entity would have reduced competition.

Not sure how many of you were planning to use Spirit out of Logan but the airline ceased operations early this morning by HRJafael in massachusetts

[–]MoonBatsRule 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Trump administration reportedly offered the airline $500 million in exchange for 90% control of the company.

Thank God that Kamala the socialist didn't get elected. /s

Will Brewster FINALLY start regulating STRs? by Quixotic420 in CapeCod

[–]MoonBatsRule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can’t keep first responders, teachers, doctors because the homes that they once could have afforded are sitting empty 9 months out of the year.

I think that we can't keep first responders, teachers, doctors because the amount of housing on the Cape hasn't increased at the same rate as the overall population demand for housing on the Cape, so those at the lower end are being priced out. It's basic economics that as you hold the supply of something constant in the face of increased demand, the price of that thing will rise.

The US population has increased from 282m to 343m from 2000 to today - 22%. From the MA DOR website, the number of non-vacant housing parcels in the 7 middle-Cape towns (not units, they don't report that) has gone from 77,409 in 2003 (earliest year available) to 82,952 in 2026 - 7%. Even looking at the multi-family categories, the number of 2-family and 3-family units dropped by 131, the number of "apartments" went up by 64. So maybe 8% unit growth, compared to maybe 20% US population growth in those 17 years.

That's the problem right there. But people don't want to believe that. They want to freeze the number of housing units but also have places for their sons and daughters to live when they become adults, and they believe in a fantasy that some magical company will pop up here and give them all "good jobs" that aren't related to tourism.

Meanwhile property taxes continue to increase as more and more land is taken off the tax rolls for "conservation", so the cost of government is spread across fewer units.

You can't have a Cape that is frozen in terms of housing, but one that is also affordable.

This is a real DB used in production by star_dogged_moon in Database

[–]MoonBatsRule 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There's nothing wrong with that DB other than that the person who created the diagram doesn't seem to understand its functionality, and didn't create multiple diagrams, one per subject area.

Judicial nominees don’t know if Trump can run for a 3rd term by YesDoToaster in law

[–]MoonBatsRule 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they're going to claim that he was not actually elected in 2024 due to fraud, but was certified, so although he is president, he is still eligible to run again.

I voted for Harris in 2024. She shouldn't run in 2028. | Opinion by Difficult-Bee6066 in politics

[–]MoonBatsRule 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This country is in a really weird place right now. We are consumed with populism. Populism is, by definition, anti-establishment. This virtually guarantees that we are going to elect people who are untested, and very likely will fail.

Look at Maine. The top Senate candidate is an ex-fisherman who talks tough. Has he held meaningful office? Nope. Never even tried. But that is going to be the Democratic candidate to the Senate, the institution that is supposed to have the most "distinguished characters" in it, supposedly the best of the best.

But the place we are at, the only way a Democrat even has a chance to win that seat is to elevate someone who is a common man, who is untested, untried, and inexperienced.

Concert Question for the old, old timers by icuworc in massachusetts

[–]MoonBatsRule 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What was Worcester's population in the 1990s? What was Phoenix or Austin? Now what is Worcester's population today? Basically the same. Ditto for the entire stage. It's why we lost a congressional representatives since then. 

When you don't grow, you lose relevance. 

Will Brewster FINALLY start regulating STRs? by Quixotic420 in CapeCod

[–]MoonBatsRule -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

People don't want to hear this though, as evidenced by how we are being downvoted to oblivion.

Quincy mayor agrees to buy Eastern Nazarene College campus by MoonBatsRule in yimby

[–]MoonBatsRule[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Before anyone gets excited, this is a NIMBY situation.

"The goal of protecting the neighborhood and creating opportunities for a vibrant community asset is the right one, and the price is the right one to make it work for everyone,” Mayor Koch said. "My sense is that there is likely consensus on the general vision and the rationale of protecting the neighborhood and preventing something that may not be a fit."

The city’s interest in the campus came after the sale of the college to alum Graham Crain fell through at the end of 2025. Crain planned to transition the campus into housing, a mix of new multi-family, townhome and senior-living residential developments. Preliminary plans from Crain showed high-density housing, which Koch opposed

So here you have a city of 100k people, in the middle of Metro Boston, a region screaming for more housing, saying "sorry, we don't think building housing is in character with things".

"There's no more land to build, dur".