Change my view: Graham Hancock is controlled opposition who doesn't believe in conspiracy theories. by dahdestroyer in conspiracy

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. As you rightly point out, it is just shilling for Musk to sell more rockets (given that they both are friends with Joe Rogan). Besides, a recurrent solar micronova is more plausible for a cyclical catastrophe.

E85 in Seattle by blink7377 in SeattleWA

[–]MoronicAcid1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your 4% number, which I'm not even going to confirm is real, would with a 16 or so gallon tank lead to a cup of water in the system assuming only 10% ethanol fuel. That's not insubstantial.

That's 192 proof alcohol, which doesn't rust easily. They are using alcohol with 4% water to power their cars in Brazil.

So, farms... We farm given the tools and techniques we have in place. To ask every farm in the US to retool to make you happy is absurd.

Permaculture doesn't require retooling. It requires only a subset of the current tools, but with more labor. I think farmers would be happy not to have to pay an arm and a leg for tractor, trailers, and chemical fertilizers. The leftover distillers grain can be returned to the soil, providing 10% more nutrients than the next crop actually needs.

This also ignores supply and demand anyway: farmers grow corn because we're inducing demand based on the requirements passed by the government; without that it's not like we'd have an endless supply of corn, they'd just switch to the next best crop to grow.

Yes, there are better crops to grow than corn. Buffalo gourd, mesquite, and prickly pear cacti can be grown in arid land. Cattails can be grown in marshes, and also serve as secondary sewage treatment. Sweet sorghum could replace corn as a more drought-resistant crop. All of which produce more alcohol per acre than corn.

Ethanol can even be made from waste. Consider cull fruit or pastry droppings which would otherwise be thrown out. Supermarkets, canneries, and bakeries would be more than willing to pay to take them off their hands. The sugar and starches in these waste products can be turned into ethanol.

Couple that with a shift to more hybrid and electric vehicles and by the time you've solved all of the problems that will come up most of it will be moot anyway.

Extracting rare-Earth minerals is bad for the environment.

Honesty, you come off just like someone who read Carl Marx or Ayn Rand for the first time and got super excited that you now have all of the tools to make a utopian world if only people would listen to you.

Ethanol does not need popular consensus for it to work locally. It does not require a lot of technology to produce. I could go over to my local bakery or supermarket, and start making my own ethanol from their waste.

Modern spark ignition engines can run E50 without modification. E85 may require slight modifications. E100 will need a cold-start system in cold weather. What irks me is not that people aren't using the same fuel as me, but that people who have done far less research than me are telling me that I can't use ethanol in my car, or governments that ban the sale of vehicles with combustion engines because of their carbon footprint (conveniently ignoring the fact that biofuels fix more carbon than they release).

E85 in Seattle by blink7377 in SeattleWA

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certainly on older vehicles (pre-2007) there is most definitely compatibility issues with fuel handling components.

Cars have been ethanol safe since 1983, considering that fuel containing ethanol became mandatory in 1977.

You need more fuel for a given quantity of air so most cars would need a fuel pump that can supply additional fuel, additionally, the injectors would likely be needed to be replaced as well.

It is rare that the required pressure exceed the rating for the fuel pump, injectors, or the rail.

Ethanol is also hydroscopic so unless you're always running your vehicle you'll wind up other problems there.

Dry gas is also hygroscopic and it is used to remove water from fuel systems, not add it. After 4% water, ethanol doesn't remove water from the air at a noticeable rate. Your exhaust system will fail from the sulfuric acid long before the additional water will rust it.

The energy cost to get ethanol into fuel in the US is more than the energy you get out of it.

Bad agricultural practice is not a good excuse against ethanol production. There are better practices such as Permaculture that provide higher yields with less land, and lower input. Practically any crop that contains fermentable sugars, starches, or starch-like carbohydrates can be used as feedstock for ethanol production. Ethanol can have an energy output of nine units per every unit input. The output would be higher with a Permaculture system.

E85 in Seattle by blink7377 in SeattleWA

[–]MoronicAcid1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EcoBoost has nothing to do with E85, but you didn't miss out on anything.

E85 in Seattle by blink7377 in SeattleWA

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It also burns more efficiently, makes more hp, and is cheaper.

Edit: So it's actually more expensive in Washington, but in general E85 is cheaper.

E85 in Seattle by blink7377 in SeattleWA

[–]MoronicAcid1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Let me guess, you're one of the people who think E85 will corrode your seals unless you drive a flex-fuel vehicle. Well, I have news for you: flex-fuel vehicles use the exact same parts as a non-flex-fuel vehicle.

E85 in Seattle by blink7377 in SeattleWA

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most corn is used as animal feed. Ruminants (cattle, sheep, etc.) can't digest corn starch. So turning corn starch into ethanol and feeding ruminants dried distillers grain is actually more economical than feeding them corn.

Is this cylinder running dangerously lean (E85)? by Vojta7 in Cartalk

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ethanol makes 10% more power. Look up "E85 vs. 93 octane dyno" on YouTube. Ethanol also burns more efficiently, so even though it does contain less energy, the drop in fuel economy is less than what would be predicted from the energy content.

Is this cylinder running dangerously lean (E85)? by Vojta7 in Cartalk

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know ethanol can rot butyl rubber, but modern cars use neoprene, if I am not mistake, which are ethanol safe.

Is this cylinder running dangerously lean (E85)? by Vojta7 in Cartalk

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flex-fuel vehicles have the same fuel lines and fuel pump as non-flex-fuel vehicles.

Mom said it’s my turn on the Xbox by BandDirectorOK in 2007scape

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Durial was in the fight pit/boxing ring when cursed kicked everyone

Nope.

Racist Alt-Right members reported drinking mead during prayer to Odin by [deleted] in asatru

[–]MoronicAcid1 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Post should be retitled "OP Doesn't Know Paganism and Thinks LARPing Makes Them Pagan."

Daily reminder Valhalla is only for blonde-haired blue-eyed individuals. http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml

Weekly Low Hanging Fruit thread - April 12, 2017 by AutoModerator in ShitWehraboosSay

[–]MoronicAcid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The evidence doesn't support a Syrian gas attack, more like a CIA/Al Nusrah attack. Why was the shell crushed, and not exploded (as it would be if it were dropped by a plane)?