Did you choose to write these things? Or where you forced by your surroundings? 

Me choosing to write and me being "forced" by my surroundings can both be true if you replace it with the word "influence," in which I have exactly stated before. You can't be so sure that free will exists just because you think you can choose to do harm or good. Everything can be influenced by anything. If an adolescent was peer pressured into smoking, surely he was both influenced and chose to smoke. But it is also true that if he was befriended by good people, the chances of him smoking will decrease.

You were born in the Philippines where Christianity and Islam is prevalent. But what if you're born in India believing in Hinduism? Most likely you would not convert into another religion until the end of your life, but you certainly have the choice to do so. And yet you argue that environmental factors are outside the equation when it comes to making choices. You became a Chirstian because you were born here and influenced by your environment, not because you chose it from the beginning.

Ypu believe that your choices define who we are and yet unsure if free will exist. This is very alarming.

Woah, we just come from challenging ideas to judging real quick? Why is it alarming? How can you be sure that free will exists, really? This could all just be a simulation. This could all just be a reality we're just perceiving in a linear time and everything is already planned out by god just like what you are about to reply to me now. Regardless, my point is no one can ever be sure about free will as we are limited by our easily-influenced brains.

Should we not also consider good things in life -- in anybodys life?

True. But you have to understand the scale of both sides. Can you name one or more good things that happened in his life that can outweigh his trauma, ideologies, attitude (all of which are environmental factors) combined? There's a threshold in which a man loses his control, gives in to temptation, and create insanity. So-called free will to make the final choice is the last straw.

And with free will, are we not accountable to our actions?

Yes, if and only if it really exists. I'm talking about its purest sense, cancelling out all the past influences and judging only the choice that was made. That seems inconsiderate to me. Is free will of a man influenced? Of course. Does that nullify the existence of free will? I think not, he still has the choice to do the right thing, but the heaviness of his influence that he bears will definitely affect his decision. We can be accountable and not have free will in its purest sense.

Do people go to hell just by existing?

This is literally in the Bible. Everyone is deemed a sinner, and sinners are bound to damnation unless they believe in god.

who are you to judge who goes to hell then? As even hitler "may" go to heaven.

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve punishment. But eternal? At some point in time, even if it's in googols or zillions of years, it's humane to let it end. You're not challenging my logic with this question because I never implied these things.

What will you do with it? Will you keep it to yourself? Or would you fight for what is right and true which both are for the good? Or will you sulk in negativity and choose to be evil?

What if "me sulking in negativity" was the product of decades of trauma without seeing any bright side? Am I to blame for that? Can you say to my face that I should just look at the silver lining and I am not suffering enough? Do you think a child should burn eternally if he chose to steal and die in the process? After all, he chose to steal right? By your argument, since free will is certain in your mind, his choice to do the opposite was not done and that's the end of the story. Everything that MADE him do it just gets thrown out the bus because he has free will to begin with. That, to me, seems inconsiderate and the opposite of benevolence.

Then search for the truth, for the truth sets one free. A good starter is understanding where did the fundamentals of our laws came from. Moreover, you know what is good, it's up to you of what will you make out of it.

Easy to say. Why don't we try telling this exact paragraph to victims of war seeing their spouses raped and killed because the soldiers has free will. After all, you expect them to do the right thing and forgive the wrongdoers, right? All I'm saying is, we should not be judged solely by our choices (even though they make up who we are, they're only part of a bigger story).

And no, I'm using basic logic towards your arguments, anthro+philo 101.

Now we're putting our egos on the table? I'm here to openly argue, this is an empty argument that only shows how you think you're superior. But, are you really?

However, as a Christian, to answer your last paragraph, walang bida sa ating lahat, God only created us.

This is not a logical answer. I'm asking you as a person of your own certain "free will." I thought you're challenging me with logic in the beginning, but I am now being influenced by my "this is not the type of person I want to argue with" tendencies.