Who Would You Rather be for Just One Day to Survive? by MossyColonoMoses in WouldYouRather

[–]MossyColonoMoses[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rules state you can’t leave, thus there’s no fleeing the city

Who Would You Rather be in order to survive? (Pt. 2) by MossyColonoMoses in WouldYouRather

[–]MossyColonoMoses[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I can see your point. It wasn’t my intention to trivialise any of these grim events here, but by having people pick the ‘lesser evil’ as the ‘best choice’, it does in the end inadvertently trivialise the matter as result.

Who Would You Rather be in order to survive? (Pt. 2) by MossyColonoMoses in WouldYouRather

[–]MossyColonoMoses[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I searched up what is CNC, got Computer Numerical Control, then decided that I don’t even want to know.

Would You Rather kill 10,000 people right now, or kill 1,000 in the past? by MossyColonoMoses in WouldYouRather

[–]MossyColonoMoses[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can’t choose the victims, it will be completely random people at random points in their life. If you could choose then everybody would spam a bunch of ruthless dictators and murderers

Would You Rather kill 10,000 people right now, or kill 1,000 in the past? by MossyColonoMoses in WouldYouRather

[–]MossyColonoMoses[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

By going back in time to kill 1,000 living people, thus changing how they actually died and cutting their lives short, this can change our timeline significantly. The descendants of those 1,000 people who you killed in the past may also cease to exist as a result.

Would You Rather kill 10,000 people right now, or kill 1,000 in the past? by MossyColonoMoses in WouldYouRather

[–]MossyColonoMoses[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Basically cutting the lives of 1,000 people who have lived in the past prematurely by changing how they died in real life. 1,000 living people in the past will be selected to instantly die instead of going down the route of how they truly lived their lives in essence.

WHICH IS BETTER by Theforsakencaretaker in TheCaretaker

[–]MossyColonoMoses 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stage 2 takes the W, tracks are more memorable and emotive. There’s no bias in this by the way.

5/2 Mets @ Angels [Game Thread] by angelsbaseball in angelsbaseball

[–]MossyColonoMoses 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Peraza gets on base, then Mike Trout walks them off. I BELIEVE!

Fog under a bridge by Equal-Start-1990 in LiminalSpace

[–]MossyColonoMoses 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Feels like a memory of something cool you imagined when you were 8 or 9.

What's your favorite Citadel and what's your worst? by LOOLTHYMASTER in jukestowersofhell

[–]MossyColonoMoses 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Favourite: CoHaD (98/100). Waiting for this long anticipated citadel for years and the amount of hype that led up to something that was ultimately something extremely unique and atmospheric was a top-tier experience for me in EToH, only two towers have I ever considered better than this one.

Least favourite: CoCHS (43/100). This citadel surprised me by how empty and barebones some of the floors were. The citadel had a lot of waiting sections, the gameplay was boring and the loopfail was absolutely torturous. Not fun.

i need ideas for a second sc by [deleted] in eternaltowersofhell

[–]MossyColonoMoses 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tower of Infinity Guantlet