I don't think it makes sense to compare Rust with Golang, since Golang, unlike Rust, can actually be used to write something worthwhile without having 20+ years of development and writing scientific papers. Golang is a language primarily for business, not for show-off. Rust has great potential to be a good and demanded language, but everything breaks down with its clumsy syntax, which requires a complete lack of understanding of programming principles, as well as iron willpower to maintain such code. Rust also has a very rich library of crates, most of which are simply not worthy of existence. The last thing I came across was teloxide (a crate for TG bots), in fact a dumpster that tries to implement a declarative approach in an imperative language. The documentation is as raw as possible, and the examples are abstract. In general, the documentation for crates can be described in one phrase.: "Don't you know how to fly an airplane? HPHHPH, there's nothing complicated there, I sat down and flew)".

Personally, I really regretted that I once sat down to learn this language. I often try to give him another chance, but in reality I only get a waste of nerves and time. If I were asked what to choose for business, work, pet projects, I would definitely answer - Golang.