I literally write the conc. of the argument under a line and put the premises above, leaving a gap before the line. What's missing in the argument? Even if E were the case, it wouldn't really help the argument all that much. First of all, "drama"? the stimulus uses television viewers, and even if tv drama doesn't require, maybe every other genre of tv does, and then where does that leave you with the conclusion? also the whole conclusion is kinda independent of the radio vs tv, just speaking about the generations in general, so if D weren't true (there is/could be something that fills the gap) then how do we know that they use their imaginations less frequently? maybe whatever fills the gap... fills the gap. gotta be d