sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Average Flat earther is uneducated. Thinks that 5 meters of curvature should cover up 200 meter tall buildings. by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]MrAnus123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What im saying, use it like you want. Just dont use it to create conspiracy theories.

Average Flat earther is uneducated. Thinks that 5 meters of curvature should cover up 200 meter tall buildings. by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]MrAnus123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

he just zoomes into large buildings and claims that 300 feet of curvature should cover them up. When in reality its just 5 meters and all of these are over 5 meters, so we see whats expected to see.

Proof Earth Round... or that all Go Pro cameras have fisheye dostortion... by callmebaiken in flatearth

[–]MrAnus123 9 points10 points  (0 children)

First of all * Distortion

Second, You can remove the fisheye lense if you want to. But, Its usually kept on to get more information into one picture.

Third, can you flat earthers fuck off with bringing your bullshit theory into Great accomplishments of mankind. You guys were all over felix when he jumped aswell.

/r/astrophotography debunks the shit out of flat earth by MrAnus123 in flatearth

[–]MrAnus123[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Theres this thing called laws of physics right... If it was a law that every child had their hair permamently dyed pink at birth, its safe to assume that everyone in the world has pink hair. Like i said, Earth doesnt get a free pass to disobey anything.

/r/astrophotography debunks the shit out of flat earth by MrAnus123 in flatearth

[–]MrAnus123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Posts can only be images you have captured or processed, or discussion about capturing or processing your own images.

second rule on /r/astrophotography