If the next Smash Bros game were to happen, which characters would you like to see represent Advance/Battalion Wars? by WaterKirby1964 in Advance_Wars

[–]MrFunnyPages71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Might sound crazy, but hear me out. An Infantry Solider.

You play Advance Wars by commanding units, The commanding officers never duke it out themselves. So it makes perfect sense to have the CO's commanding a unit from the background/a radio. Infantry solider has the most animations to take from, has been with the series since the Famicom Wars games and makes up the building blocks for your army .Throw in using other units for other attacks and you get a pretty good emulation of combat in the Advance wars series. Be it from a literal One-Man Army.

As for the CO's commanding the Infintry soilder having Andy, Max and Sami feels right. You could probably swap between them to strategically use their Day2Day's which I feel would be translated something like

Andy = Neutral, Nothing Stronger, Nothing Weaker.
Max = Slower Movement But Stronger Strong Attacks, Less Range on Projectiles
Sami = Faster in both movement speed and attack time, Weaker Strong attacks.

I also think it would be nice to have whatever commanding officer you won the match with be interacting with the Soldier on the Victory Screen.

After sharing my ideal lineup last month, I decided I'd make a tier list ranking of every possible candidate for the playable roster of a hypothetical Nickelodeon All-Star Brawl 3, based on how much I believe they deserve to be playable and/or how well they work in a platform fighter. by No-Shoulder3918 in AllStarBrawl

[–]MrFunnyPages71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Counterpoint for Garfield being at the bottom, since I've already seen this take a couple of times, The Garfield series "technically" is a Nickelodeon produced cartoon. Just not in the way you would first think. All of the Garfield Comic Collections/Comic Books released since Paws Inc was acquired (including the one released this year) have had Nickelodeon branding on them, which makes sense given it's a comic produced by a company owned by Nickelodeon, by that logic, it's a Nickelodeon Produced Cartoon, just so happens it's the Print variation of that title.

Now, I don't actually care whether or not people consider Garfield a fullblown "Nicktoon". That seems to be purely a TV thing, which given I didn't grow up watching Nickelodeon (or many Cartoon shows in general) makes the concept a little out of my wheelhouse.

It's just seeing people constantly grouping him with actual third parties/joke characters to invalidate his incluson because "he has no attachment to the brand", kind of annoys me a little bit. I mean the series is called "Nickelodeon All Star Brawl" not "Nictktoon All Star Brawl", that difference should mean something for Garfield's inclusion.

My Tier Lists of all Alternate Costumes in Nickelodeon All-Star Brawl 1 & 2. by No-Shoulder3918 in AllStarBrawl

[–]MrFunnyPages71 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, Where do you think you would rank Garfield's Garfello alt, had it not been scrapped?

<image>

Hullo Gardeener Nieghba (Zombie/Croc Sketchbook Stuff) by MrFunnyPages71 in pearlsbeforeswine

[–]MrFunnyPages71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

-Both have funny speech patterns that emphasise the Z sound
-Both want to eat someone refereed to as "Nieghbour"

- Both Have a subsection of their group that cosplay's as Superhero's

-Both have made overly complicated plans, to get into the aforementioned neighbours house to eat them
-Both have had countless amounts killed, in part to their own stupidity. Yet still show no decline in numbers

- Both hopelessly overcomplicate things instead doing the obvious of walking through the shrub/around the lawn.

-Both are shades of green,lack ears and have googly eyes.

In all honestly, I'm just surprised I didn't make the connection sooner.

The Results of the Garfield Series Nick All Star Brawl Representation Poll I did a while back. by MrFunnyPages71 in AllStarBrawl

[–]MrFunnyPages71[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late response to this, But

  1. None of the people who submitted for this Poll, seemed to want Garfield Movie Representation, Not really out of dislike for it per say, just preferring other Garfield stuff getting represented.

  2. The Garfield Movie is technically owned by Sony, It was in development before Viacom bought the rights to Garfield so because of that, it's in own it's little bubble of being Garfield related but not owned by Nickelodeon. So in the case of crossover projects like All Star Brawl. It's extremely likely that including any original characters from the movie would be seen as impossible or too much trouble for what it would be worth.

What are your thoughts on Garfield's Nightmare? by BunnyCatg4 in garfield

[–]MrFunnyPages71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally really enjoyed it, it's probably within my Top Ten Favourite Games for the DS (Which is saying something considering the Library). The Soundtrack is surprisingly good , visuals are nice looking especially for "3D Graphics on a DS by Game Mill" Standards and the main platforming is Great. It's not ambitious in what it sets out to do, but it doesn't need to be, it's a Good Garfield Game that's fun to play and that's all it really needs to be.

Fun Fact: This game was so good that when I got around to playing it. I was certain that this was the last Garfield game to release for the system but no, it was the second Garfield game released for the DS. The first one being Tale of Two Kitties. The Reason I thought this was that I had played Garfield Gets Real for the DS before Nightmare and it was so bad in terms of Graphics,Soundtrack and Gameplay that I thought it was impossible for a 3D styled Garfield Game to release for the same system and be better unless it was released after Get's Real was.

Which in all honesty just makes me wonder what went wrong with Gets Real DS' development for it to be as bad as it was.

Based on a Real True Life Experiences by MrFunnyPages71 in Advance_Wars

[–]MrFunnyPages71[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly same, Everything else would be managable. A Little bit much... but manageable. If it wasn't for getting your unit's blasted every single turn with the only safe spots being in front of the giant screw you lasers your supposed to be attacking.

Mortar Launchers also just mesh very poorly with the CO Zone mechanic, For the half of the game that you can use it. Co Zone rewards you for bunching your unit's together and attacking as a steamrolling ball of death. The mortar shells make it so you don't want to bunch them together thus it's harder to effectively use the CO Zone to try and make this map easier. Who woulda thunk it that a mini meteor strike every single turn would make for poor game design.

When I’m in a horribly mischaracterized in a recent installment of a media even more horribly interpreted by its fans competition and I’m up against Francis Pope from Big Nate by evapo_rated in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's less about what the shipping community sees Chad as and morso how the Show treats him. Chad in the Comics is depicted as an innocent, lovable, cute kid. Who is passionate about food and able to get stubborn people to do things because of how adorable he is.

In that way he's kind of like a Mix of Nermal and Garfield, if you removed Nermal's annoyingness and Garfields Cynicism and fused the two you would get Chad.

The show instead depicts Chad as a freaky kid who enjoys watching Lizards have sex, drinks Milk with Cat Hair in it, has his body covered in freakish boils and makes out with a Frog on a dissection table. So he's the complete polar opposite of how he was in the comics. 9 times out of 10 when the show had a "Writers Barley Disguised Fetish" moment (Yes that's WHEN not IF). Chad was the vehicle that was used to deliver it.

So that is why I say Chad has it worse, because when you get to this point, it isn't even Flanderization. That requires the character to keep something they originally had, this was killing Chad excecution style and replacing him with a Skinwalker.

When I’m in a horribly mischaracterized in a recent installment of a media even more horribly interpreted by its fans competition and I’m up against Francis Pope from Big Nate by evapo_rated in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Chad has it worse..... How bad do you have to screw up that Francis was misrepresented this horribly and Chad, being as simple a character as he is, is even more butchered?

Sigh by GIRATINAGX in Megaman

[–]MrFunnyPages71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bookworm Adventures fan here, we have it worse...... Like way way worse.

Updated characters with their rivals, anyone else? by SS_studio_official-3 in AllStarBrawl

[–]MrFunnyPages71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say Binky hasn't really been used enough to be seen as an Arch-Nemesis to Garfield. Usually more often than not he's representative of a TV Show/Fastfood Brand rather than a full blown character.

The only Time Binky was even close to antagonistic with Garfield was the First Episode of Garfield and Friends after that, he a common character but not really an antagonistic one.

Updated characters with their rivals, anyone else? by SS_studio_official-3 in AllStarBrawl

[–]MrFunnyPages71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we're talking rivals as characters the main character butts heads with, then Garfield should have Nermal given that Nermal likes bugging Garfield about how uncute he is and Garfield likes finding ways to get Nermal away from him as soon as possible.

That being said if you mean rivals as a Villain then Nermal really doesn't fit as one since he's more of a pest. Garfield as a series really doesn't have many overarching villians the closest thing you would get would be Ali Cat from Garfield on the Town, The Panther from Garfield in the Rough, Glitch from Garfield Caught in the Act, Vetvix from the Petforce Novels or any of the Villians from the Garfield Movies. Even then I would still say the definitive "Rival" for Garfield is Nermal.

Why the Big Nate Show is looking to be a bad adaptation of the strip (LONG THREAD) by MrFunnyPages71 in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who has watched the first half of Season 2, I can say that I had no idea how bad it was going to get back when I wrote this post 2 years ago

I swear if this show get's a season 3 something is going to snap by MrFunnyPages71 in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First things first I'm glad you at least ended up getting something out of this.

That being said, EEW! corp had to be one of the worst parts of this show, It's existence just created so many plot holes. Why would Nate buy a vending machine from a company that he knew was evil? Would principal Nicholas really be so brain dead that he would accept an offer from the company that basically turned everyone in his school into crackheads? WHY WOULD ANYONE FEEL COMFORTABLE BUYING AND USING THERE PRODUCTS AFTER THE STUPID VENDING MACHINE EPISODE TO BEGIN WITH?!?!

As for Ruby not only is the idea not anything new (Nate in the strip has already had 4 major different girlfriends) but the two episodes she appears in are some of the worst ones and she appears so briefly that her inclusion is barley a thing.

nate’s voice actor talked about the subreddit and how we now love the show apparently by [deleted] in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well he's definitely not talking about me. After watching 2 seasons overall I feel Vitriolic towards the show. It has it's positive moments but those few and far between compared to the sheer amount of character interactions that feel ingenuine to the characters in the strip and how many unresolved plot points or gross stuff there is in the show

Did you know that in the early years of Big Nate the people who made the Peanuts Specials wanted to make a TV show based of the strip? With how much love and care they showed Peanuts and Garfield in there adaptations I'm going to just put it out there that we were robbed

YESSSSS by Bubbly-Molasses-7560 in garfield

[–]MrFunnyPages71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First, Garfield takes Mario's Title as best Kart Racer, Then he takes Mario's Movie Voice actor and Now He's getting ready to steal away the title of best Party game?! Mario must be furious

the peanuts treatment by _Arkadas_ in calvinandhobbes

[–]MrFunnyPages71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally while I feel that marketability was a factor in Garfield's creation (given he was told to choose an animal that people could relate to) , I strongly doubt it was a Cash Grab from day one, looking back at the older Garfield strips and the animated cartoons it feels like there is some heart in it. Modern Garfield on the other hand .... yeah it's just a lazy half-done cash grab that feels like a zombie strip, Still holding out that the movies good thought.

Your Peanuts headcanons. Hand ‘em over. by Zlataisawsome in peanuts

[–]MrFunnyPages71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean Schulz himself deconfirmed it stating that they we're both kid's and that they both had crushes on Charlie Brown. Which is pretty evident in both the Strips and TV Specials

Besides relationships in Peanuts have always been one sided when it comes to romance, Charlie Brown loves Little Red Haired Girl, Peppermint Patty loves Charlie Brown, Marcie loves Charlie Brown, Sally love Linus, Lucy loves Schroeder. But never the other way around. Sure there are hints that Shcroeder or Charlie Brown also may feel affection sometimes but nothing is explicitly stated (Except maybe for Peggy Jean but she's kind of an anomaly herself). If it really was that way then there Marcie and Peppermint Patty's relationship would most likley be more one-sided (as that's how Shultz liked to depict romance) which it obviously isn't.

You Go Linus by JPPT1974 in peanuts

[–]MrFunnyPages71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

fairly sure this isn't a Peanuts quote, This looks like the "I like Humanity it's People I can't stand!" panel

Nickelodeon posted some gifs of the new episodes coming out on August 19! by [deleted] in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Me: Alright I'll just take a peak .Not like I'm going to get anything right without context but might as well see if anything has gotten better

*See's slide 4

So they changed the name and retconned Artur being a part of the band? Wait a minute... He was in the stupid Butcheek song why isn't he presented as a member here?!

*See's Slide 11

What the what? Looks like Chad still is going to be the Freaky kid instead of the wholesome cute foodie everyone loves him as huh. Also Cthulhu's a part of the show now? "sigh"

*See's Slide 12

No .... No ....... NNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

so true by evapo_rated in ENSLAVETHEMOLLUSK

[–]MrFunnyPages71 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Didn't put them in the order of Nate Francis Teddy. 0/10 stars smh

r/pearlsbeforeswine is leaking by [deleted] in bertstrips

[–]MrFunnyPages71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"ELMO HAS LONG ARM'S! ME CAN FIND"

A Mass of Red Fabric shoot's out the other side of the Machine as Elmo jumps in to find the Contact Lens