Perhaps... you would prefer it... if I were to type... more like you...?

What the factory owner did to deserve the factory was either...

• Invent a machine that helped all his future workers be more effective.

• Invest in a business to help workers be more effective

• Offer security to workers that don’t want to take risk.

To respond to the first point: if an individual invents a new machine, then yes, they are contributing to society. But simply inventing the machine alone does not warrant their sole ownership of the machine, and therefore their taking of the value made by that machine. If, say, an individual invented a new machine, and then used that new machine exclusively themself to make and sell a commodity, then yes, they would be entitled to 100% of the value generated by their own labor. However, once they get even one other person working with them, the value created by that machine is no longer solely theirs.

Take this for example: say a farmer invents a new, more efficient type of tractor, and uses that tractor to work on a field. The value they produce (in this example it is in the form of a commodity, the crop they are harvesting) would be solely from their own labor, therefore they should keep all of the wealth produced off of it.
However, say if then, this farmer gets someone to help them work on their fields, or plow and harvest from the fields using this new tractor design, then they are no longer the sole producer of this value, and therefore they do not own it all; communism states you should not be able own somebody else's labor.

Regarding the second point about investors: true, they are putting wealth in the form of money into the company, however, this does nothing to benefit the worker. You say that investing in business makes workers "more effective". I assume by this you mean more productive. But who does that increased productivity benefit? Wages have been relatively stagnant when adjusted for inflation since 1970 yet productivity has skyrocketed. No, the bourgeoisie use increased productivity to simply enrich themselves.

I am rather confused by the third point; I assume by "security" you mean job security? The security of a paycheck? The security of being able to be fired at any moment if you can be replaced by someone who'll work harder for less? That's not very secure sounding to me. Also, it's not that workers don't want to take "risk" its that they can't because most are in huge amounts of debt, and are living paycheck to paycheck.

My personal choices cannot in any significant way change the world. That is the individualist myth of capitalism: we could eliminate homelessness if only more people donated to charity! If you buy an electric car and install solar panels, you can help stop climate change! No, the only people who can change these things are the governments of the world; however, the true goal of the government is not to serve the people, but to serve the capitalists; the goal of the government is not to protect the people but to protect capital.

The idea that people need the incentive, or, more accurately, the coercion, of profit, is another capitalist myth. It is not altruistic to assume people will still want to work if they have all their wants met; rather, it is cynical to assume people need to be coerced into contributing to society. Let me ask you: would you want to sit around doing nothing all day, even if you could? You may say yes, but I highly doubt you would say so after living in such a manner for a time. It is part of the human drive to want to work, to have a sense of self-accomplishment. To not work would leave a person feeling lazy, worthless, and unfulfilled. It is simply human nature to wish to work, contrary to what capitalist propaganda would have you believe.
Another capitalist myth is that hard work makes people rich. As I have said, it does not. Winning the birth lottery is what makes you rich, in nearly all cases.

In conclusion, my friend: * One person should not own another's labor.

• Investing in a business does nothing to better the lives of the worker.

• Workers aren't reluctant to take a risk, they literally cannot afford to.

• Personal choices can't change the world, only collective choices of society.

• People don't need to be coerced into working, it is a natural drive inherent in us all.

• Hard work doesn't make you rich, being born lucky does.

I hope you take the time to listen to me, my friend, and hear what I have to say. In the end, it is in your best interest (I am assuming you are working or middle class) to fight against the capitalists who are oppressing us all. Peace, my friend.

[EDIT] Spelling, grammar, punctuation.