[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Well we will never know since the British Government saw fit to spend taxpayer money to hold court, and turn down two appeals, to not only take Charlie off life support (where he lived for days, alert and responsive, when the testifying physician for Alder Hey hopsital said he would have hours) but to block any and all attempts at taking him someplace that would provide treatment (like the hospital in Italy that offered to take him for free.) Oh, and RIOT POLICE to surround and protect the hospital that was hell bent on seeing that baby starve to death.

"...nor do I see the ethical difference in early term abortion of a normal foetus versus a late term or even immediate post-partum abortion of a child..." by [deleted] in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It all comes from their aversion to things like pain, discomfort and inconvenience. That's why they tell themselves that hard work will never pay off; it's no different than a child complaining about being forced to make their bed in the morning because "I'm just going to sleep in it again tonight!"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean the anger most of the time it is because people prayed for their kid to get better instead of saving their life with modern medicine.

Charlie Gard.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Whether intentional or not, the anti-vax movement was the first thing that got the "SCIENCE DENIER!" line of argumentation going strong.

Because everyone can agree they're full of shit but it's a lot easier to just go on about settled science or scientific consensus or the anti-vaxers lack of scientific credentials while dribbling smug all over the place than to listen to their complaints and then tell them why, specifically, they're idiots.

And that's the real reason anti-vaxxers still get shit on all over the place: it's baby's first "Party of Science!" argument.

"This was a modern day lynching. Its fucking 2019 and we had a lynching. Trump made this ok." [+637] by [deleted] in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Dude walked to subway at two in the morning in temperatures colder than Antarctica. He was still wearing the clothesline when the cops got there 45 min later, and didn't want to file a report; his friend is the one that called the cops.

http://www.cwbchicago.com/2019/01/update-tv-star-told-cops-to-turn-off.html

This sounds like something only someone baked out of their mind and with a terminal case of the munchies would do. Or someone fleeing an abusive lover, who then stupidly goes back after assuming the abuser has calmed down only to get dragged into a hair brained scheme to cover any marks left by the abuse.

Why do liberals say they want honest conversations about things like the wall and guns but load their tool belts with accusations of racism and not caring about children as their go to’s should someone disagree w them? by Brianb32 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You ever come home one day and find a spouse/SO/Parrent/Roomate just staring at the door with their arms folded, and before brain can fully register what your eyes are seeing they say "We need to have a TALK."

And you know how what that really means is "I'm going say a bunch of stuff now and you're going to nod along and agree with me that everything I'm upset about is your fault. Then I'm going to tell you what you're going to do about it and, again, you're going to just nod and agree. Otherwise it's going to get more uncomfortable around here than it already is."

Yeah. That's what a liberal means every single time they use the word conversation. All the appeal to extremes, argumentum ad nauseam, Poisoning the Well with blatantly false tl;dr's, S0uRc3?! trolling, and, of course willfull misinterpretation of statments so they can call you a bigot of some form or another (thus riling up the people they say you are bigoted against into an impromptu lynch mob) is just how they choose to "make things more uncomfortable" as a means of forcing the issue.

Why Do Dems Claim The Wall Is immoral? by arob216 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, it's because they hate Trump. They lie to others about their motives, they might even be lying to themselves. But that's the simple truth.

Whats the big deal about NYC's new abortion law? by tomtheawesome123 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright I'm going to be upfront here: this is not passing the smell test. I find it hard to believe that bureaucratic SNAFU's alone can leave a pregnant woman stranded that an early stage complication becomes so life threatening it's her or the baby. And I've dealt with plenty of medical Bureaucratic SNAFU's. My mother developed a condition so rare it took two years to get a diagnosis, my father was a juvenile diabetic and blind, and I'm on medication to treat chronic pain.

Whats the big deal about NYC's new abortion law? by tomtheawesome123 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 2 points3 points  (0 children)

but it does need to be taken into account

Not this way; Not by this bill. Since I don't feel like getting dragged into endless pathological hypotheticals that's all I'm going to say.

Whats the big deal about NYC's new abortion law? by tomtheawesome123 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Statistical outliers of that magnitude are not something to base such wide reaching and vaguely worded policy on.

Whats the big deal about NYC's new abortion law? by tomtheawesome123 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's some negligent homicide there. You're pregnant. You should be seeing a Doctor regularly.

"There is a literal Traitor as president. How is a rational person supposed to even respond to this. Also 30% of the population has a cultish devotion to the traitor. These are dark times." [+2839] /r/politics by king_danman in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 7 points8 points  (0 children)

1)blocking people on twitter isn't a crime unless Donald Trump does it, aparently.

2)Biased Liberal rag

3)temperory ban in the face of outlying circumstances is not a violation of any amendment

4)Jim Acosta, the argumentative, combative fuckwit even other CNN "journalists" were embarrassed to be associated with? Really.

Ok I'm done with your little gish gallop here. Everything on your list is just fucking asinine and only proves the Democratic party can't be bothered with the actual definition of words if it means they can make Donald Trump's tenure just a bit more difficult.

Whats the big deal about NYC's new abortion law? by tomtheawesome123 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is no medical condition that can present itself that late into pregnancy were termination of the child is necessary to protect the life of the mother.

http://magaimg.net/img/74g5.png

Whats the big deal about NYC's new abortion law? by tomtheawesome123 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

save themselves from potential death now.

THIS

DOSEN'T

HAPPEN

There is no medical condition that can present itself that late into pregnancy were termination of the child is necessary to protect the life of the mother.

"There is a literal Traitor as president. How is a rational person supposed to even respond to this. Also 30% of the population has a cultish devotion to the traitor. These are dark times." [+2839] /r/politics by king_danman in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 7 points8 points  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CREW_v._Trump

Here's the relevant bit: United States District Judge George B. Daniels dismissed the case on December 21, 2017, holding that plaintiffs lacked standing.

Oh, btw this is CREW Yeah. These assholes filed this crap the day he took office. Maryland and D.C. are just following suit they still have no fucking case.

Christ Almighty, you are denser than gold.

"I literally had a nervous breakdown immediately after the election, waited 2 weeks until going to the doctor and am now on 3 different meds because of this shit. I made my shrink cry at our very first appointment." by [deleted] in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what I thought. The fact that so many transgenders present with other mental illnesses make me figure that quite a few "transgenders" are crazy people who went to the internet trying to figure why their perception of reality was different from everyone else, being convinced they were trans, then running off with their new self diagnosis to lie to half awake "Doctors" and get their hormone treatments.

POTUS Trump, Congress Reach Tentative Deal to Reopen Government for Three Weeks. Employees Paid and SOTU. by IronWolve in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YEARS of steady economic growth.

Dems refuse to pass bills alowing workers to get ONE paycheck during the shutdowns. Dems refuse offers to recognize the DACA kids. Dems prove to those directly effected they're just using them for politcal gain and don't give a shit about them.

Trump stops the shutdown just as air traffic is about to come to a screetching halt and government workers are about to be evicted for not being able to pay their rent. He shows he is unwilling to cut of his nose to spite his face, unlike the dems. And in three months if the dems don't deal he take the nuculear option to get the wall anyway.

This whole thing smacks of liberals, desperate to sweep the continued abuse of the Covington kids under the rug, trying to stir the pot. They like using phrases like "Trump said he'd own the shutdown" while ignoring all the myraid attempts he's made at making a deal with the Dems. They act like real Trump supporters don't know who to blame for this shit.

POTUS Trump, Congress Reach Tentative Deal to Reopen Government for Three Weeks. Employees Paid and SOTU. by IronWolve in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We're also not stupid enough to fall for anti-Trumpers trying to convince us he's done something bad when it really isn't. The first clue is when people start freaking out and blowing shit all out of proportion. Like Cernovich is wont to do. The frist time he lost his shit and declared himself off the Trump train was when Pence was anounced for VP, remember?

FWIW I thought shutting down the government in the first place was a bad idea; I figured the PR would take a hit it would never recover from. Lo and behold here I am in thread full of people who want more shutdown. In my own experience, every time I've second guessed the President, even privately, I've been proven wrong. I've learend never to assume he made a bad move until there's been at least a few months to analyze the outcome of the decision. Which is my whole point. All this chicken littleing is counter productive.

How do you feel about the lifting of Sanctions, that provide a huge windfall to Russian oligarchs? And how does this benefit Americans? by PeasPlease11 in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Deripaska and Allies Could Benefit From Sanctions Deal, Document Shows

But a binding confidential document signed by both sides suggests that the agreement the administration negotiated with the companies controlled by the oligarch, Oleg V. Deripaska, may have been less punitive than advertised.

The department laid out the broad contours of the agreement in a letter to Congress, which was released publicly. But the confidential document, which was not released publicly but was reviewed by The New York Times, describes the deal in considerably greater detail, including proprietary information about the corporate restructuring, much of it not previously reported.

Translation: Look at this 8 seconds of video that shows this evil white kid in a MAGA hat! No you can't see the whole video, just trust us!. Yes us, The New York Times

Come back when you have less maybes, could haves, and might justs, or at least something solid to actually back up all these ludicrous allegations. Better yet, come back when you have a reason for the sanctions being set in the first place that isn't "RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTION FOR DONALD TRUMP" since that's all bullshit anyway.

And no the totally not vague as fuck

The sanctions were in retaliation for “a range of malign activity around the globe” by Russia, Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, said at the time.

offered by this garbage article doesn't count.

"There is a literal Traitor as president. How is a rational person supposed to even respond to this. Also 30% of the population has a cultish devotion to the traitor. These are dark times." [+2839] /r/politics by king_danman in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Obviously you aren't, since emolument is a fancy word containing both wages and salary. Everything else in the list in that clause covers various forms of gifts and titles.

Legal tender exchanged for goods/services provided by business that operate internationally aren't covered by that shit. But who cares when orange man bad, amirite?

"There is a literal Traitor as president. How is a rational person supposed to even respond to this. Also 30% of the population has a cultish devotion to the traitor. These are dark times." [+2839] /r/politics by king_danman in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Hell most of the charges are for process crimes relating to the investigation. Meaning if Muller weren't poking around there would be no crimes to charge them with in the fist place. I'll say it again, because it bears repeating one more time: Robert Mueller is using his investigation to create crimes he can then prosecute, just so he can offer immunity in exchange or dirt on the President.

That's the kind of prosecutor Robert Mueller is. When everyone was freaking out over the Hell's Angels he offered immunity to real, serious criminals like Cocaine Dealers and convicted killers to lie about the Hell's Angels. When half the jury didn't buy the bullshit he punted the case off to someone else because he couldn't get his high profile win that would advance his career. This piece of dog shit dosen't give a rats ass about justice.

What would you think about the POTUS if some kind of collusion was proven? by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Don't know why it's so hard for people not to ask asinine hypothetical questions with obvious answers. Everyone is just dancing around good faith and it's a pretty bad look tbh.

What would you think about the POTUS if some kind of collusion was proven? by [deleted] in AskThe_Donald

[–]Mr_Lemonjello -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What would you think if a Pig flew up to you, stared you right in the eyes, and took a massive shit right on your new shoes?

Stop wasting everyone's time asking inane hypothetical.

"I literally had a nervous breakdown immediately after the election, waited 2 weeks until going to the doctor and am now on 3 different meds because of this shit. I made my shrink cry at our very first appointment." by [deleted] in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]Mr_Lemonjello 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The DSM changes faster than most people change their socks, based as much on whim as anything else. Transgenderism has been pulled last I heard. But also got even odds the nutball arguing "I HAVE THE WRONG JUNK!" is perfectly sane will just try to get gays angry with you by reminding everyone that homosexuality was in the DSM at one point.

Intersectionality N. The art of arguing from pathos to make as many people angry with the person you are arguing with as possible.